The image was back tracked to a hentai site, thus I am unable to link the pic he ripped but I screen capped it and blurred the link. If mods would like a link to the pic, just pm me.
Now right away when you look at the picture he posted, you automatically see that it's rather dark, a bit too dim for a scanner yet too perfectly captured to have been taken by a camera. I scanned the pictures data and it was shown no use of a camera being used. Thus it's a pic that has been scanned (Through just common logic you can tell it). So, scanners give good lighting, this picture is dim. Thus, it was tampered with, it's exposer was lowered. Now, heres the original picture.
You must be registered for see images
Here is his.
You must be registered for see images
Look closely at those two pictures, you will notice the shading is identical. The line work is identical. Everything about it is the same except that he lowered it's brightness down.
"But yard, the original one has 0 shading in some areas, whereas the one he posted has the shading." When you lower exposer or brightness of any kind you will start to see the shading all fall into place. And for those of you who still may doubt me, I took the original and lowered the exposer exactly like he did.
This is the result.
You must be registered for see images
As you can see, he did actually rip this art. I made my post in this form because I'm tired of hearing pathetic excuses. By going the extra mile, I made it so that he cannot defend himself. I took the original picture into photoshop, did exactly what he did and achieved the same result as him, if you look closely at my version and his posted one, you will see the exact same shading and basically an identicle copy. All he did was lowered the exposer, and erased the words.
You may get infracted for the nipples though xd
