Search results

Thanks Michelle for the game! I wish I lived longer to experience more of the flavor and correct my reads in-game. But nonetheless, a cool set up, and I'll keep an eye for other role madness games here :ssymb:

It was a post made with town motivation. I don't think a wolf would even think to make it. It's AI in that he was attempting to figure out someone's alignment, and I buy that it was a real attempt. I feel that you're taking my analysis at face value? It's not simply that he backed off quickly...

I see my unvote on Misa was not counted - but that's okay. I still lean them as scum. As they have yet to follow up on the reads they requested me to provide. Suggesting my impression of them - that they were only asking to have me spend energy on players other than them and were not interested...

Misa you are amazing and I appreciate you clarifying the issue with my name If you need rest, rest!! Also, FoS on Poison

SleepingTerror is my username (also on discord), though ScarletTerror was the hydra I used with Scarlet for the an unlucky game where I randed mafia. (I'm not really here, I'm cleaning up my room because the Fire Marshall said he'd fine me if I didn't, so I'm stuck in my dorm until it's done...

If you mean we should blindly sheep you based on your past impeccability at catching wolves, I think not (yet, at least). ~~ @Waindo Could you respond to this? Unless you did already and I missed it.

Inactivity is not always an indicator of alignment - I'd be surprised if all the inactives were wolves, as this is almost never the case (based on past games I've played). Last game I played on this site that ended not too long ago, off the top of my head, there were maybe 5 subs for inactive...

But is the game not using flavor from this book? Otherwise, why even reference it? Though this is a no-claim set up, softing can force the player to have accountability for their actions (therefore they are more likely to be town), especially if they were under no threat of being lynched (and at...

I had no idea the game I was playing was based off a book. Should have done my research. I think it's +town for Waindo though. Unless there's a lost wolf in this set up. Then all this hinting doesn't look good.

What changed from the time you voted him to the time you unvoted him, regarding his behavior? I don't fully understand why you voted him in the first place either. Did your votes have anything to do with mine?

Oh yeah, I picked that up. I don't think the votes are baseless though. Generally lack of solving coupled with concern over how others read you is a scumtell. Best way for people to read you accurately is to post your thoughts on other players.

Why though? I'm not understanding your thought process here. What made you vote them, and what makes you unvote them now? It also doesn't feel completely coincidental that you only voted Misa after I did, and only unvoted after I unvoted?

I'll take a look at Lukundo. I think he's going to be a difficult player to read though, if looking at reasoning for their reads alone, whenever that comes. In the meantime, I don't need a vote here anymore, as it'd be unnecessary (and possibly detrimental) pressure: unvote I like Duk for town...

I should correct this. Misa's joke comment felt a bit unnatural to me, not because I suspected him to be cult (though that was a possibility), but that cult is a rarity on MU and passing it off as an existing faction in this game felt off. It would be like bringing up serial killer in a game...

I see that for sure. As you may have noticed, I am one to read off semantics. I could very well be nitpicking at nothing, but that has not always been the case.

It's cool, it's a game, it happens, I like you a lot too xD I can be defensive as well, it's in tune with my personality, so that can't be fun to deal with either. I'd like to work with you, but before that can happen, I need to be certain of your alignment, and there are always going to be...

Why?

So it's the mere act of bringing it up. I don't entirely agree but I sorta see your point. I'll note this. It feels more condescending than anything though.

Is that something they're incapable of saying as scum?

But the flavor is listed in the OP, for everyone to see? How is revealing information that's available to everyone lack of care of how they come off? Then that's something he can address himself. Instead he's ignored that part of my reasoning. Why make guesses as to his thought process though? I...