- Joined
- Feb 9, 2012
- Messages
- 14,168
- Reaction score
- 1,484
My point was that the prisoner gets food for free and a free person has to work for it.
yeah but the prisoner can't choose his food or when he gets it
My point was that the prisoner gets food for free and a free person has to work for it.
A rock may not move on its own, mainly because its an inanimate object, so how could you ever compare having free will to a rock just sitting there. So yes, your right, a rock doesn't have the free will to move, but the person walking by it has the the free will to pick it up, and move it, or keep it, come home, read this thread, and smash it against there computer, because of how annoying the thread is. Dude, you want to philosifize, join the philosophy team that meets every other Wednesday, at 4:00pm, at school.
Never said I'm angry. Also it's not a debate when the other sides just flat out wrong!wow dude cool your tits bro. I even said on my thread that I don't actually follow what I said here, this was only to start up an interesting conversation....and I'm obviously going to defend my point because that's what a debate is.
You didn't choose to be angry, reading this thread is what forced you to be.
Never said I'm angry. Also it's not a debate when the other sides just flat out wrong!
wow dude cool your tits bro. I even said on my thread that I don't actually follow what I said here, this was only to start up an interesting conversation....and I'm obviously going to defend my point because that's what a debate is.
You didn't choose to be angry, reading this thread is what forced you to be.
It says under general discussion, Discuss here the latest headlines and debate on serious matters
if you have a problem with that, then take it up with the mods
However, their rules are kind of... In the eyes of the beholder. Take this thread for example. Free will is not considered a serious matter by a lot of people, and neither is it a "latest headline", so this thread will probably become closed in a little bit. I however think free will is a major issue, since no one has free will.
Actually I didn't really smash a rock against my computer. Ya know why? Because I've got the free will not too. I also had the free will to fuk with you, and say I smahed a rock against it, though.hmmm well if smashing a rock against your computer from reading this thread isn't anger, then I don't know what is.
oh and you're telling you know the mysteries of the universe now? I'm listening god
I did and it's very interesting, but it also shows how free will(will without any shackles or limitations) doesn't exist.
I found the part about the motion interesting, since I was going to use that same sort of example in this thread but take it a step further.
If energy can't be created nor destroyed, then what created the first force to combine the energy into the big bang "star"?
Not sure if this is scientifically correct. But the way I see it, something can't be created from nothing. So what created the first motion?
This is just a random topic/debate I felt like making arguing against free will
When you hear the term free will, one think that means we are able to make our own choices...but when it boils down to it, free will is just an idea.
We make our choices based on the world around us, and how it affects us.
We live by codes; sure we can choose to live a certain lifestyle/code, but a lifestyle is not a choice, it's necessity.
We are sometimes bribed to choose(meaning there is an ultimate reward or punishment for that choice) which influences us to choose.....such as paying bills or facing debt
Most people choose to pay the bills, why? We don't like doing it, but we have to or we face a negative consequence. Is a choice like that made freely when the decision factor is more or less a bribe?
It's comparable to finding a hundred dollars on floor....virtually everyone will make the choice to pick it up. So is that really a choice of free will? It's almost certain that everyone would pick it up.
We can choose to not breathe or not eat, but then we will die. So we are essentially forced to choose certain things if we want to continue living.
Living is what gives the ability to choose, so if we don't choose correctly, we won't live.
we are also forced to live by certain universal laws that we can't "will" ourselves out....like living with gravity or dying.
So what choices do we have that define "free will"?
well people usually compare free will with choice that have more or less to do with morality
not killing, not stealing, not sinning in general, self sacrifice, etc
yet most make these decisions based on the consequences that may occur or from fear of making the choice.
So does the influence of other factors and driving forces such as one's feeling and impulses define human's to having free will? I personally don't think so.
a rock doesn't move on its own unless a force is applied to it.....hence the rock is not of it's own free will to move.
this is the same way with how certain forces are applied that force humans to choose the way they do.
To be truly free means having absolutely no outside factors applied to do any sort of decision of one's own choosing....hence the only way, and hypothetically, the only one to truly be free and have free will is god.
Free will is an idea, we know what it is and we can comprehend it but we will never experience. This is the same thing with the idea with infinity....we have the idea, but not the true experience.
--for the record, this is all hypothetical and not something I actually, personally believe in.
go home Confucius you're drunk
Yeah I sort of agree. We think just like computers in a way. Everything we want to do is first passed through a few conditions (should I really do this? is this socially acceptable? what will I earn from this? should I waste my time on it?) then actually executed.This is just a random topic/debate I felt like making arguing against free will
When you hear the term free will, one think that means we are able to make our own choices...but when it boils down to it, free will is just an idea.
We make our choices based on the world around us, and how it affects us.
We live by codes; sure we can choose to live a certain lifestyle/code, but a lifestyle is not a choice, it's necessity.
We are sometimes bribed to choose(meaning there is an ultimate reward or punishment for that choice) which influences us to choose.....such as paying bills or facing debt
Most people choose to pay the bills, why? We don't like doing it, but we have to or we face a negative consequence. Is a choice like that made freely when the decision factor is more or less a bribe?
It's comparable to finding a hundred dollars on floor....virtually everyone will make the choice to pick it up. So is that really a choice of free will? It's almost certain that everyone would pick it up.
We can choose to not breathe or not eat, but then we will die. So we are essentially forced to choose certain things if we want to continue living.
Living is what gives the ability to choose, so if we don't choose correctly, we won't live.
we are also forced to live by certain universal laws that we can't "will" ourselves out....like living with gravity or dying.
So what choices do we have that define "free will"?
well people usually compare free will with choice that have more or less to do with morality
not killing, not stealing, not sinning in general, self sacrifice, etc
yet most make these decisions based on the consequences that may occur or from fear of making the choice.
So does the influence of other factors and driving forces such as one's feeling and impulses define human's to having free will? I personally don't think so.
a rock doesn't move on its own unless a force is applied to it.....hence the rock is not of it's own free will to move.
this is the same way with how certain forces are applied that force humans to choose the way they do.
To be truly free means having absolutely no outside factors applied to do any sort of decision of one's own choosing....hence the only way, and hypothetically, the only one to truly be free and have free will is god.
Free will is an idea, we know what it is and we can comprehend it but we will never experience. This is the same thing with the idea with infinity....we have the idea, but not the true experience.
--for the record, this is all hypothetical and not something I actually, personally believe in.
But is it free will if we choose based around factors that affect our choice?
Like the example I gave.....a rock doesn't move on it's own unless an outside force moves it.
These outside forces define our decisions, making the decision not necessarily our own.....so how could that be free will?
but we can't do whatever we want, because if we could do anything, then we would be god.
This is just a random topic/debate I felt like making arguing against free will
When you hear the term free will, one think that means we are able to make our own choices...but when it boils down to it, free will is just an idea.
We make our choices based on the world around us, and how it affects us.
We live by codes; sure we can choose to live a certain lifestyle/code, but a lifestyle is not a choice, it's necessity.
We are sometimes bribed to choose(meaning there is an ultimate reward or punishment for that choice) which influences us to choose.....such as paying bills or facing debt
Most people choose to pay the bills, why? We don't like doing it, but we have to or we face a negative consequence. Is a choice like that made freely when the decision factor is more or less a bribe?
It's comparable to finding a hundred dollars on floor....virtually everyone will make the choice to pick it up. So is that really a choice of free will? It's almost certain that everyone would pick it up.
We can choose to not breathe or not eat, but then we will die. So we are essentially forced to choose certain things if we want to continue living.
Living is what gives the ability to choose, so if we don't choose correctly, we won't live.
we are also forced to live by certain universal laws that we can't "will" ourselves out....like living with gravity or dying.
So what choices do we have that define "free will"?
well people usually compare free will with choice that have more or less to do with morality
not killing, not stealing, not sinning in general, self sacrifice, etc
yet most make these decisions based on the consequences that may occur or from fear of making the choice.
So does the influence of other factors and driving forces such as one's feeling and impulses define human's to having free will? I personally don't think so.
a rock doesn't move on its own unless a force is applied to it.....hence the rock is not of it's own free will to move.
this is the same way with how certain forces are applied that force humans to choose the way they do.
To be truly free means having absolutely no outside factors applied to do any sort of decision of one's own choosing....hence the only way, and hypothetically, the only one to truly be free and have free will is god.
Free will is an idea, we know what it is and we can comprehend it but we will never experience. This is the same thing with the idea with infinity....we have the idea, but not the true experience.
--for the record, this is all hypothetical and not something I actually, personally believe in.
I get what he's saying n I agree. To have actually free will is to make your own decision without an outside factor affecting that choice. Just like the example about why a person would be hesitant to go commit murder out of the fear of going to jail. If u have true free will the factor of going to jail should not have an effect of whether or not the choice u make.