- Joined
- Mar 18, 2011
- Messages
- 4,209
- Reaction score
- 185
You seem to be suggesting that evolution refers only to the very first creation of life.[/B] I'll meet you on the grounds that currently there isn't a considerable amount known about the first life but evolution is so much more than that.
We see the effects of evolution every day. We are constantly searching for new antibacterial drugs because of resistance caused by the development of the bacteria they target.
bold: well no you are mistaken
no we do not see any effects of evolution that Darwin and modern day Darwinites perpetuates. what you have just describe is adaptation, evolution claims that living creatures evolve over millions of years through a process called natural selection, a fish turning into mammal, then to apes then to humans this concept has no evidence and go against science itself, there are 3 effects of mutation to an organism gene pool, either it gets sick, stays the same or die it does not change at all. do you see evolution taking place today? no and you never will. The fossil evidence just shows new organism popping out of no where there are no transitioning fossils to support evolution claim thus far and even if a transitioning fossil did come up it still wouldn't prove anything because it could just be an organism that looked like a dog and a cat not necessarily proving that the dog evolved into a cat.
Last edited: