Kimimaro Kaguya

[The_Empire]

I should really stop lurking this much -_-

maybe you should

how come :T_T:

You will find out in the future episode of Kaguya Monster Transformation

 

[Gin-San]

@bold That wouldn't happen in anybody dream. Kimimaro already prove that chakra infused weapons can't cut through the Kaguya bones. He proved this in the manga going against a samurai.

Actually, the Samurai Sabre Technique did cut through the bone, though it didn't cut through. The reason though, is because the samurai wasn't actually attacking, much less with something like Iado, but defending against an attack. You don't have complete offensive capabilities when you defend against an attack. In conclusion, the manga has proven that Samurai Sabre Technique can't cut through bones if the sword is used entirely defensively, but it is sure it could cut through the bones if used offensively.

And is not like Kaguya lose so much when their bones are cut anyways, they can regenerate them

Spoiler

If you see in the picture, the sword did cut through the bone, but didn't cut through it. Take into account the samurai was just defending against the clash, he wasn't entirely using an offensive maneuver against them.

You must be registered for see images

 

[The_Empire]

Actually, the Samurai Sabre Technique did cut through the bone, though it didn't cut through. The reason though, is because the samurai wasn't actually attacking, much less with something like Iado, but defending against an attack. You don't have complete offensive capabilities when you defend against an attack. In conclusion, the manga has proven that Samurai Sabre Technique can't cut through bones if the sword is used entirely defensively, but it is sure it could cut through the bones if used offensively.

And is not like Kaguya lose so much when their bones are cut anyways, they can regenerate them

Spoiler

If you see in the picture, the sword did cut through the bone, but didn't cut through it. Take into account the samurai was just defending against the clash, he wasn't entirely using an offensive maneuver against them.

You must be registered for see images

Well you do make a good explanation and it is true but if the samurai was on the offense it probably wouldn't go all the way through the bone. But I still have my doubts about the samurais can cut the bones since Naruto in his Nine Tails mode which is stronger then a chakra infused weapon. But still good explanation still.

 

[Akisha]

loves the arguing xd

 

[The_Empire]

loves the arguing xd

No arguing, just proving info for both sides without the cussing and yelling xd. Gin is a cool person from I can tell so no need to argue with the guy .

 

[Gin-San]

Well you do make a good explanation and it is true but if the samurai was on the offense it probably wouldn't go all the way through the bone. But I still have my doubts about the samurais can cut the bones since Naruto in his Nine Tails mode which is stronger then a chakra infused weapon. But still good explanation still.

Well, Naruto wasn't in the nine tails mode when he fought Kimimaro, but actually was enraged and had some of the beast's chakra being leaked and mixed in his own chakra. The chakra doesn't make him "sharper", but stronger, that is a huge difference between his claws and Samurai Sabre Technique. Also, there is no evidence in what Naruto was capable to do to the bones, as he never really got any solid hit. In contrast, Samurai Sabre Technique sharpens the katana to an incredible high degree, certainly much more sharper than Naruto's claws in nine tail mode, and from the evidence given from the clash between the samurai and the kaguya, is is plausible that the samurai will be able to cut through Kaguya's bones.

Also, it is quite the balance. Samurai have a sword to use in battle (well, multiple, but these are limited), while Kaguya's are able to keep creating bones out of is body, basically an unlimited supply of it. Will samurais be able to cut through it? Yeah, it is entirely possible, but does this warranty the samurai's victory? That of course lays only on skill.

loves the arguing xd

I do not understand why you call every discussion an "argument", please try to prevent confusioning the definition between argument and discussion.

Argument._ An exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one

Discussion._The action or process of talking about something, typically in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.

You also thought we were "arguing" in our fight in the village, which is entirely wrong. When a person wants to reach a result, it isn't necessarily arguing unless you incite confrontation with certain agitations.

 

[The_Empire]

Well, Naruto wasn't in the nine tails mode when he fought Kimimaro, but actually was enraged and had some of the beast's chakra being leaked and mixed in his own chakra. The chakra doesn't make him "sharper", but stronger, that is a huge difference between his claws and Samurai Sabre Technique. Also, there is no evidence in what Naruto was capable to do to the bones, as he never really got any solid hit. In contrast, Samurai Sabre Technique sharpens the katana to an incredible high degree, certainly much more sharper than Naruto's claws in nine tail mode, and from the evidence given from the clash between the samurai and the kaguya, is is plausible that the samurai will be able to cut through Kaguya's bones.

Also, it is quite the balance. Samurai have a sword to use in battle (well, multiple, but these are limited), while Kaguya's are able to keep creating bones out of is body, basically an unlimited supply of it. Will samurais be able to cut through it? Yeah, it is entirely possible, but does this warranty the samurai's victory? That of course lays only on skill.



I do not understand why you call every discussion an "argument", please try to prevent confusioning the definition between argument and discussion.

Argument._ An exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one

Discussion._The action or process of talking about something, typically in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.

You also thought we were "arguing" in our fight in the village, which is entirely wrong. When a person wants to reach a result, it isn't necessarily arguing unless you incite confrontation with certain agitations.

I told love you Gin

*covers mouth*

Oops, did I say that out loud. Oh well you do make sense and I even looked back at a few things we said and you are correct. Gin the Sage of Proof xd

 

[Gin-San]

I told love you Gin

*covers mouth*

Oops, did I say that out loud. Oh well you do make sense and I even looked back at a few things we said and you are correct. Gin the Sage of Proof xd

Well I am glad we were able to arrive to a peaceful conclusion ^^

Sage of Proof?

I think ''Sage of utter laziness" suits me better. xd

 

[Akisha]

Well, Naruto wasn't in the nine tails mode when he fought Kimimaro, but actually was enraged and had some of the beast's chakra being leaked and mixed in his own chakra. The chakra doesn't make him "sharper", but stronger, that is a huge difference between his claws and Samurai Sabre Technique. Also, there is no evidence in what Naruto was capable to do to the bones, as he never really got any solid hit. In contrast, Samurai Sabre Technique sharpens the katana to an incredible high degree, certainly much more sharper than Naruto's claws in nine tail mode, and from the evidence given from the clash between the samurai and the kaguya, is is plausible that the samurai will be able to cut through Kaguya's bones.

Also, it is quite the balance. Samurai have a sword to use in battle (well, multiple, but these are limited), while Kaguya's are able to keep creating bones out of is body, basically an unlimited supply of it. Will samurais be able to cut through it? Yeah, it is entirely possible, but does this warranty the samurai's victory? That of course lays only on skill.



I do not understand why you call every discussion an "argument", please try to prevent confusioning the definition between argument and discussion.

Argument._ An exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one

Discussion._The action or process of talking about something, typically in order to reach a decision or to exchange ideas.

You also thought we were "arguing" in our fight in the village, which is entirely wrong. When a person wants to reach a result, it isn't necessarily arguing unless you incite confrontation with certain agitations.

I know the difference between a discussion and arguing -_- and okey I might have used the wrong word shame on me... but please don't start talking about the thing in Konoha as it was clearly arguin as you said arguing is usualy heated and angry just like it was then, because back then you said I need all the help in the world if I ever wanna pass my sensei test and you pointed out how many times I . Fine I hold no grudges but please don't say it wasn't arguing back then when you clearly pointed out some personal issues which clearly made it aruging

 

[Gin-San]

I know the difference between a discussion and arguing -_- and okey I might have used the wrong word shame on me... but please don't start talking about the thing in Konoha as it was clearly arguin as you said arguing is usualy heated and angry just like it was then, because back then you said I need all the help in the world if I ever wanna pass my sensei test and you pointed out how many times I . Fine I hold no grudges but please don't say it wasn't arguing back then when you clearly pointed out some personal issues which clearly made it aruging

But if you see the conversation, you were the one who incited the "argument" when you mentioned that I was the same as my generation and that I ruin the fun in the RP, though I was only trying to get things straight. I believe you attacked a personal issue with me and my generation first, thus my reason in my retaliation.

But! I apologize for saying such things as a response, though I had some hidden intentions in what I said, the message still had some good intentions, not defying your skill level, but just saying you would need help in it, as many have failed the test. So you could say I had two intentions with it, but it seemed you only saw the negative side from it, which in part is my fault by proposing such innuendo.

 

[Akisha]

But if you see the conversation, you were the one who incited the "argument" when you mentioned that I was the same as my generation and that I ruin the fun in the RP, though I was only trying to get things straight. I believe you attacked a personal issue with me and my generation first, thus my reason in my retaliation.

But! I apologize for saying such things as a response, though I had some hidden intentions in what I said, the message still had some good intentions, not defying your skill level, but just saying you would need help in it, as many have failed the test. So you could say I had two intentions with it, but it seemed you only saw the negative side from it, which in part is my fault by proposing such innuendo.

I do apologize for what I said, I realize I was the one who started the arguing and now that you mention it I remember I started with the personal issues... And I did saw only the negative side of it because I was angry (just failed yet another one etc.)

we should have a fight sometimes