Suggestion

[Punk Hazard]

I'd like to make a suggestion: How about in the special techs threads, there's a post stating who can teach this. This would save people time in looking for a sensei/sempai.

For example, let's say I want to learn Lava Techs. Instead of going to the sensei table and scowering it looking for a sensei, I can just go the the thread where the Lava Techs are posted. While I would normally just see the jutsu list for Lava, there would be an extra post there with a list of who teaches those techs. That way a person can just go straight to the techs they need to learn and they'll see the people who teaches the techs. This would also cut down on threads like "Who teaches..." on the Base.

 

[chaotykxninja]

good sugg.!

 

[Lysander]

Would make it alot easier so i agree

 

[Ryuu..]

Great suggestion xd

 

[Akuma]

It sounds ok, but then they would have to do it for every KG, wich would take time.

 

[Naruto Uzumaki Bijuu Sage]

great suggestion

 

[Punk Hazard]

It sounds ok, but then they would have to do it for every KG, wich would take time.

Who said mod/admin was easy?

 

[BlacKing]

Not a Bad Suggestion. Easily done. Doesnt even have to be updated that often. Quite plausible Idea.

I see Zise checking the thread now so lets see what he will say. U_U

 

['Kurapika]

in the sensei table thread, just press Ctrl+F and type lava and you'll find all the sensei's capable of teaching lava, same goes for the rest of the KGs.

 

[Tsukune]

Its a good suggestion, but it seems unecessary, if we were to just post that info in the sensei table.

 

[The Pervy Sage]

Not a Bad Suggestion. Easily done. Doesnt even have to be updated that often. Quite plausible Idea.

I see Zise checking the thread now so lets see what he will say. U_U

Zise has nothing to do with the rp it's not his thing.

Its a good suggestion, but it seems unecessary, if we were to just post that info in the sensei table.

And we have the sensei table for a reason. Stop being lazy and actually look. Stop making more work for people.

 

[Caliburn]

You know people I would really advice that you actually think more about the things you say before you say them. I see countless people only saying "good idea good idea, good suggestion", but think for a minute. What you're suggesting is the same as changing a flat tire with another flat tire. You changed the tire and for that people are praising you, but in the end nothing changed, the exact same problem remains.

Now all that information is in one specific thread and you're suggesting that we spread all that information pretty much everywhere? On top of that the biggest issue is to keep the thread up to date as it's a dynamic process and not where it's written. It's already extremely hard to do it with a single thread as it's not easy to keep track of everything and then you're suggesting that we do the exact same, only in 20+ threads?

It doesn't solve the problem and it only makes things harder. In theory now it's easy, we just have to go to one specific thread and edit everything there. With your system we should continuously go to different threads. The current way is way more economical and structural and thus overall way more beneficial to us than what you're suggesting.

 

[chaotykxninja]

You know people I would really advice that you actually think more about the things you say before you say them.................................. The current way is way more economical and structural and thus overall way more beneficial to us than what you're suggesting.

Very good, point i agree wid you, one thread is much easier to maintain then many. the main point is getting ppl to pay attention to the current system now.

 

[Illyasviel]

It's a nice suggestion.

 

[Scorps]

You know people I would really advice that you actually think more about the things you say before you say them. I see countless people only saying "good idea good idea, good suggestion", but think for a minute. What you're suggesting is the same as changing a flat tire with another flat tire. You changed the tire and for that people are praising you, but in the end nothing changed, the exact same problem remains.

Now all that information is in one specific thread and you're suggesting that we spread all that information pretty much everywhere? On top of that the biggest issue is to keep the thread up to date as it's a dynamic process and not where it's written. It's already extremely hard to do it with a single thread as it's not easy to keep track of everything and then you're suggesting that we do the exact same, only in 20+ threads?

It doesn't solve the problem and it only makes things harder. In theory now it's easy, we just have to go to one specific thread and edit everything there. With your system we should continuously go to different threads. The current way is way more economical and structural and thus overall way more beneficial to us than what you're suggesting.

Wisdom people, looks like this. Take notes please U_U​