- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 13,322
- Reaction score
- 990
In regards to that Amaterasu thing:
That's more or less the same thing. And it's already been proven untrue what with the 4th Raikage dodging it, so it's obviously doesn't "instantly" appear there.
I don't see the BS. when relevant information is released, the pages are updated properly. There's a reason wiki's have easy to use methods of undoing edits. I can assure you more or less all information there is verifiable and the important stuff is referenced and checked up on by their translator, who since he isn't a scanlator bound by a time table, has spot on translations. Game information is a bit iffy because there's so much stuff, but even they are fine so far as I've seen.
lol all fine and dandy..and i did use the website once... I know most of the stuff is correct...
But i much rather use manga pages, and databook for my info
prime example is what the previous guy was bringing up...
Narutowikia has Sakumo was stronger than the sannin....
manga has respected.........
i'll have to check viz's translation...but all the manga site translators seemed to have made it out to be respected... why does wikia have stronger? god knows..
the person who edited the page has - Naruto chapter 240, page 17
↑ Naruto chapter 449, page 9 as references...
and neither of those manga pages have anything about sakumo > sannin in strength...