Should nazis have freedom of speech?

[HowDidIGetPrem]

Has it been fixed yet? Judging by the silence between you two, it might already have.

Kalooki got struck.

You must be registered for see links

I guess we weren't referring to the same thing.

 

[Cornson]

If there isn't free speech for the stuff you don't like then your country does not have free speech and if it does not have free speech then it's not a free country.

 

[Made in Heaven]

Ok, but do you care about democracy?

lol f*ck no.

Censoring speech is literally what gives rise to dictatorships.
You'd be no better than the Nazis if you argue that some don't deserve to voice an opinion. Well imagine if Nazi's were in control and they decided that they didn't like the opinion of Jews....oh wait.

Absolute free speech VS no speech?

Neither extreme should be allowed. Total free speech leads to clowns out their advocating for faggotry, incest, and bestiality, not to mention sexual liberation that has brought nothing but broken homes, massive rates of divorce, depressed and abused women, and kids who have no idea who's their dad. You even have Richard Dawkins advocating for cannabilism, what a joke!!! At some point, you need to put a sock in the mouths of people who are advocating for shitty ideas that will lead to society's downfall.

This answer disqualifies you from this discussion.

If "God" was the arbiter of speech, then religious individuals would censor anything they deemed blasphemous. There are countless historical and current examples of this.

You have countries like Saudi Arabia that behead atheists for their disbelief in God.

What people do is of their own fault and evil, it doesn't change the fact that human's can't be left to their whims and desires to do as they please, otherwise you get fools and degenerates running around.

History and real-world examples prove you wrong.

What are laws then, genius? They are rules that CONTROL the citizen's actions and behaviours :lol Hence every society limits the people's freedom in some way through laws. WTH are you even trying to say arguing that control is not needed in a society?

Not really. The beauty of a Democracy is that people are able to vote.

>2018
>Still thinking democracies are actually democracies

 

[Lightbringer]

lol f*ck no.



Absolute free speech VS no speech?

Neither extreme should be allowed. Total free speech leads to clowns out their advocating for faggotry, incest, and bestiality, not to mention sexual liberation that has brought nothing but broken homes, massive rates of divorce, depressed and abused women, and kids who have no idea who's their dad. You even have Richard Dawkins advocating for cannabilism, what a joke!!! At some point, you need to put a sock in the mouths of people who are advocating for shitty ideas that will lead to society's downfall.



What people do is of their own fault and evil, it doesn't change the fact that human's can't be left to their whims and desires to do as they please, otherwise you get fools and degenerates running around.



What are laws then, genius? They are rules that CONTROL the citizen's actions and behaviours :lol Hence every society limits the people's freedom in some way through laws. WTH are you even trying to say arguing that control is not needed in a society?



>2018
>Still thinking democracies are actually democracies

Thank god you're not in a leadership role. We already have enough authoritarians as it is.

 

[Made in Heaven]

Thank god you're not in a leadership role. We already have enough authoritarians as it is.

:th:

 

[MAN OF SIN]

No. Because their BS often leads to violence.