1. The problems are the local authorities because they power trip into playing judge, jury, and executioner. So when the states are abusing their power, it’s up to the federal authority to delegate their authoritative power over the states by enforcing the constitutional rights of the government and the people.
2. If minorities or African American shooting is a localized problem, then you should have no problems with stereotypical caucasoid mass shootings in a localized area being solved by the local authorities.
Point is that the current president doesn’t do his job, because besides being in charge of the army his job is to be a strong willed figure head of the govt. He takes the heat and addresses the problem that the nation is facing.
This. She's just giving it a descriptor that allows her to distance the problem from the White House on name alone. It doesn't help that she goes on to acknowledge school shootings as a national problem when the numbers of deaths and incidences pales compared to police brutality's.
Police need to police themselves and black folks need to stop praising thug life.
It really becomes an endless cycle.
This problem has always been the case of "they did this thing first" and never moved beyond that.
Both police force and black community are in the wrong. Many innocents (on both sides) are thus affected by the issue of feigning ignorance and putting the blame on the other.
Classic Romeo and Juliet scenario which both families are in war with one another and yet no one knows why anymore. They just know they are meant to hate one another.
Police do get into power trips but black people are negatively portrayed in public (which SHOULD be in no fault of their own but yet they, some but not all, live their lives as degenerates and enforce that on their own and this only enforces their negative image).
This is why The White House, regardless on who is in the Office, will always call the issue as "local matters" as it is a very delicate problem. It is like having two friends fighting each other and then looking at you and you need to choose sides in which you cannot choose both as doing so means you are against both of them. You are then forced to only pick one but if you do so, you are claiming that the other is completely in the wrong and the one chosen in completely in the right. So you choose not to involve yourself and hope that they will be smart enough to come to the conclusion that both are in the wrong and make necessary steps to avoid ever avoid being in conflict again. In this case, police brutality and self-inflicted racial discrimination.
Police need to police themselves and black folks need to stop praising thug life.
It really becomes an endless cycle.
This problem has always been the case of "they did this thing first" and never moved beyond that.
Both police force and black community are in the wrong. Many innocents (on both sides) are thus affected by the issue of feigning ignorance and putting the blame on the other.
Classic Romeo and Juliet scenario which both families are in war with one another and yet no one knows why anymore. They just know they are meant to hate one another.
Police do get into power trips but black people are negatively portrayed in public (which SHOULD be in no fault of their own but yet they, some but not all, live their lives as degenerates and enforce that on their own and this only enforces their negative image).
This is why The White House, regardless on who is in the Office, will always call the issue as "local matters" as it is a very delicate problem. It is like having two friends fighting each other and then looking at you and you need to choose sides in which you cannot choose both as doing so means you are against both of them. You are then forced to only pick one but if you do so, you are claiming that the other is completely in the wrong and the one chosen in completely in the right. So you choose not to involve yourself and hope that they will be smart enough to come to the conclusion that both are in the wrong and make necessary steps to avoid ever avoid being in conflict again. In this case, police brutality and self-inflicted racial discrimination.
You have solid reasoning, but it's not as if this is just some problem blacks alone face. It's an issue that shows its head to whites as well. Trump doesn't have to pick a side either, it's not as if it's impossible to create vulnerability for offenders while leaving typical cops untouched. Instead of just having their badges taken away, they should face time too for involuntary manslaughter just as we do.
I’ll be sure to tell the grandmother whose grandchild died holding a cellphone while standing in her backyard. When all of the sudden, police officers come because they got a report, he matched description, and shot him thinking he was the guy, over 20 times.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Those are just assumptions and you STEREOTYPING. It's sickening. You have no real knowledge on what's going on with black people.
This problem has always been the case of "they did this thing first" and never moved beyond that.
Both police force and black community are in the wrong. Many innocents (on both sides) are thus affected by the issue of feigning ignorance and putting the blame on the other.
You're full of it, pulling the "both sides are wrong" shtick, just to cover up the fact that you have hatred and resentment towards the black community, whom you generalize about, and take sides with the policeman. Don't pull that "police are wrong too" reverse psychology crap, when it's obvious you're just disguising your hidden intentions, just so you don't get accused of being racist or one-sided(which you are), which will cause your point to be invalidated.
Classic Romeo and Juliet scenario which both families are in war with one another and yet no one knows why anymore. They just know they are meant to hate one another.
Police do get into power trips but black people are negatively portrayed in public (which SHOULD be in no fault of their own but yet they, some but not all, live their lives as degenerates and enforce that on their own and this only enforces their negative image).
Stop lying.Black people aren't only negatively portrayed by news/media, YOU also portray them in a negative light, and you're actually CONVINCED of this negative portrayal.You don't have an actual understanding or intel as to what's going on. Just a bunch of surface dweller, stereotypical nonsense.
This is why The White House, regardless on who is in the Office, will always call the issue as "local matters" as it is a very delicate problem. It is like having two friends fighting each other and then looking at you and you need to choose sides in which you cannot choose both as doing so means you are against both of them. You are then forced to only pick one but if you do so, you are claiming that the other is completely in the wrong and the one chosen in completely in the right. So you choose not to involve yourself and hope that they will be smart enough to come to the conclusion that both are in the wrong and make necessary steps to avoid ever avoid being in conflict again. In this case, police brutality and self-inflicted racial discrimination.
You trying to play "fair", was actually "rule/sentiment" based, wasn't an actual analysis of what's going on between policeman and black individuals. Everything you've said, was simply what you want to see, and not what's really going on.
It's just a bunch of self-entitled ideals. You don't know.
To me it's just a disguised racist rant, and it looks like you convinced some other people.
IMO, the police officers are mostly in the wrong by having access to guns and have non-precise authority that is somewhat unfair to civilians, how many of you knew that, legally, you can give fines to cops?
Back on topic, the fact that it's legal to possess a weapon is wrong, I mean, if it's for protection than clearly something in the current society is wrong since Americans need protection from a weapon.
IMO, the police officers are mostly in the wrong by having access to guns and have non-precise authority that is somewhat unfair to civilians, how many of you knew that, legally, you can give fines to cops?
Back on topic, the fact that it's legal to possess a weapon is wrong, I mean, if it's for protection than clearly something in the current society is wrong since Americans need protection from a weapon.
You clearly have absolutely no idea why America was founded on the rights for citizens to bear arms. I don’t give a **** if weapons had evolved or not; you’re not taking my weapons. Get that ignorant, sheep rhetoric out of here.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Those are just assumptions and you STEREOTYPING. It's sickening. You have no real knowledge on what's going on with black people.
You're full of it, pulling the "both sides are wrong" shtick, just to cover up the fact that you have hatred and resentment towards the black community, whom you generalize about, and take sides with the policeman. Don't pull that "police are wrong too" reverse psychology crap, when it's obvious you're just disguising your hidden intentions, just so you don't get accused of being racist or one-sided(which you are), which will cause your point to be invalidated.
Stop lying.Black people aren't only negatively portrayed by news/media, YOU also portray them in a negative light, and you're actually CONVINCED of this negative portrayal.You don't have an actual understanding or intel as to what's going on. Just a bunch of surface dweller, stereotypical nonsense.
Self-entitled argument.
You trying to play "fair", was actually "rule/sentiment" based, wasn't an actual analysis of what's going on between policeman and black individuals. Everything you've said, was simply what you want to see, and not what's really going on.
It's just a bunch of self-entitled ideals. You don't know.
To me it's just a disguised racist rant, and it looks like you convinced some other people.
I didn't even dare bother finishing most of your victimizing rant. "you're at fault, you don't know what it is like to be discriminated against"
you spew the same shit "we blacks can't be racist!" while being racist, not just to themselves but to other races as well. Blacks have massacred their own people because they are a lighter shade. For example, Rowanda.
I hate that "we done no wrong" mentality. They are the kind of people that completely focused on everyone else and see no fault about their own community, which is the main focus of my "racist rant." I said, the cops probably see the blacks is at fault and vice versa. They never see themselves to be at fault.
It angers me that you would use that narrative than to actually say something substantial and prove it base on facts. "You don't know what it's like" brate, you don't even know me
I've criticized both sides and yet you completely turned this into a racist rant. I bet you even tried to spin it around as "playing the white knight so you can be racist" spiel.
ANYBODY does not have the special privilege to be omitted from criticism.
You know as well as I do that these murders do happen however it is that they rationalize their disgusting behaviors "Oh, it is OK to do murder n----s because they are nothing but degenerates" the same reason as black degenerates rationalize their appalling behavior with "everyone is racist to us! we are owed!"
Anyone who dare points out the wrong doings of one's racial group is NOT a racist. It's just someone who is not a complete idiot.
If you are so biased and cannot see that, replace the scenario with the Whites.
Whites committed genocides all around the world and their reasoning is "we are the superior race" and you are unable to to criticize them as you are "subhuman." That is your rationale. Blacks are suppressing facts due to it having a negative impact on their own image and yet they have complete disregard on the negative impact of your actions. (not everyone of course)
ALL I'M SAYING IS THAT THEY HAVE AN EXCUSE I am fully aware of the racism that goes on. But it is that you are in denial that the black community let some people disgrace the black community. Many blacks suffer from the negative image "thug life" and yet the only thing that was being done is "they do not represent us!"
It is despicable and totally irresponsible. You feel the same way about the cops, do you not? Do you think that all cops are pigs? Of course you do not. You are a smart person. However, do you think that the cops do not have any responsibility to keep their own in check and uphold the standards that are expected of them? If you do, how come you do not with the black community or any community that has a negative image?
Not everyone is against you, you know? Having innocent people being mistreated happens to everyone. The point in case here is that the black community have a notorious negative image (that is actually celebrated).
I am well aware of discrimination and I do not and will not deny if any of the group(s) I belong to start discriminating against the others.
USING THE RACE CARD DOES NOT WORK ANYMORE
To stand idly by when your friend murders everyone in front of you rather than stopping him/her, and yet to say "I did not murder the person/people" is the same as murdering the person/people. We all have our own responsibilities and that does extend to regulating members of our own community. In this case, be it the police or our own racial group, should you or I belong to those groups.
You clearly have absolutely no idea why America was founded on the rights for citizens to bear arms. I don’t give a **** if weapons had evolved or not; you’re not taking my weapons. Get that ignorant, sheep rhetoric out of here.
I thought it was freedom of speech, not the right to bear arms that it was founded on. The idea that the founding fathers made the second amendment to combat tyranny is a myth which was propagated by the fake Jefferson quote.
It's been over 250 years since the 2nd Amendment was established. The idea of what it even meant to bear arms at the individual level when the second amendment was written bears no connection to what it is today.
Also, the constitution doesn't explicitly say that we can't restrict access to weapons. If you're arguing that it does, then are you in favor of people being allowed to own nuclear and chemical weapons at an individual level?
I thought it was freedom of speech, not the right to bear arms that it was founded on. The idea that the founding fathers made the second amendment to combat tyranny is a myth which was propagated by the fake Jefferson quote.
It's been over 250 years since the 2nd Amendment was established. The idea of what it even meant to bear arms at the individual level when the second amendment was written bears no connection to what it is today.
Also, the constitution doesn't explicitly say that we can't restrict access to weapons. If you're arguing that it does, then are you in favor of people being allowed to own nuclear and chemical weapons at an individual level?
The fact that tyranny is exactly what the Patriots fought against in the revolutionary war is proof enough that the right to bear arms exists for that reason. But elaborate for me, why do you think that law exists? And you act as if Jefferson was the only one who supported the Second Amendment lol.
@Bold: You clearly didn’t read where I’d said, “I don’t give a **** if weapons had evolved or not; you’re not taking my weapons.”
Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
In regards to that asinine question about a nuclear weapon and chemical weapons, no average civilian should have access to nuclear weapons. That question was especially foolish because I highly doubt our government would bomb itself with nuclear weapons because they’ll more than likely send out troops and drones. Which is why CIVILIANS should be armed with automatic rifles at the very least. Hell, tear gas is a chemical weapon so yes, civilians should be able to have those too.
I didn't even dare bother finishing most of your victimizing rant. "you're at fault, you don't know what it is like to be discriminated against"
you spew the same shit "we blacks can't be racist!" while being racist, not just to themselves but to other races as well. Blacks have massacred their own people because they are a lighter shade. For example, Rowanda.
I hate that "we done no wrong" mentality. They are the kind of people that completely focused on everyone else and see no fault about their own community, which is the main focus of my "racist rant." I said, the cops probably see the blacks is at fault and vice versa. They never see themselves to be at fault.
It angers me that you would use that narrative than to actually say something substantial and prove it base on facts. "You don't know what it's like" brate, you don't even know me
I've criticized both sides and yet you completely turned this into a racist rant. I bet you even tried to spin it around as "playing the white knight so you can be racist" spiel.
ANYBODY does not have the special privilege to be omitted from criticism.
You know as well as I do that these murders do happen however it is that they rationalize their disgusting behaviors "Oh, it is OK to do murder n----s because they are nothing but degenerates" the same reason as black degenerates rationalize their appalling behavior with "everyone is racist to us! we are owed!"
Anyone who dare points out the wrong doings of one's racial group is NOT a racist. It's just someone who is not a complete idiot.
If you are so biased and cannot see that, replace the scenario with the Whites.
Whites committed genocides all around the world and their reasoning is "we are the superior race" and you are unable to to criticize them as you are "subhuman." That is your rationale. Blacks are suppressing facts due to it having a negative impact on their own image and yet they have complete disregard on the negative impact of your actions. (not everyone of course)
ALL I'M SAYING IS THAT THEY HAVE AN EXCUSE I am fully aware of the racism that goes on. But it is that you are in denial that the black community let some people disgrace the black community. Many blacks suffer from the negative image "thug life" and yet the only thing that was being done is "they do not represent us!"
It is despicable and totally irresponsible. You feel the same way about the cops, do you not? Do you think that all cops are pigs? Of course you do not. You are a smart person. However, do you think that the cops do not have any responsibility to keep their own in check and uphold the standards that are expected of them? If you do, how come you do not with the black community or any community that has a negative image?
Not everyone is against you, you know? Having innocent people being mistreated happens to everyone. The point in case here is that the black community have a notorious negative image (that is actually celebrated).
I am well aware of discrimination and I do not and will not deny if any of the group(s) I belong to start discriminating against the others.
USING THE RACE CARD DOES NOT WORK ANYMORE
To stand idly by when your friend murders everyone in front of you rather than stopping him/her, and yet to say "I did not murder the person/people" is the same as murdering the person/people. We all have our own responsibilities and that does extend to regulating members of our own community. In this case, be it the police or our own racial group, should you or I belong to those groups.
The self-righteous, inconsiderate, conclusive statement "using the race card does not work anymore", is just a cover up tactic. And I'm quite sick of it. White people with an avoidant personality always using that line...it's so old.
If it's about race, it's about race, stop trying cover it up...it makes you look selfish. It's simply an "avoidance" thing...pathetic.Some of you just want to grant yourselves "invincibility" with these defense mechanisms.It's selfish, because...it IS about race, and you're trying to detract from it, cause you don't wanna discuss race...that line is so self-righteous and regurgitated.
You wanna prevent people from outing you as a racist and a supremacist that's in denial about it. I see what's going on behind your words, you're hiding that you're racist. I'm so sick of the mental tactics.
The fact that tyranny is exactly what the Patriots fought against in the revolutionary war is proof enough that the right to bear arms exists for that reason. But elaborate for me, why do you think that law exists? And you act as if Jefferson was the only one who supported the Second Amendment lol.
@Bold: You clearly didn’t read where I’d said, “I don’t give a **** if weapons had evolved or not; you’re not taking my weapons.”
You're interpretation of what the amendment says is not only interpretation. The Constitution was made to be a living document for a reason.
Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Firstly, the amendment doesn't specify that citizens such as you or I are allowed to carry guns. It's talking about a well-regulated militia, not an individual.
Well regulated militia clause clearly means the right to bear arms should only be given to these organized groups. This interpretation allows for only those in the official militia to carry guns legally, and say the federal government cannot abolish state militias.
Secondly, the right to "bear arms" does not specify guns at all. Your right to bear an arm is not infringed by restricting certain weapons. You're still able to bear arms, not bear all arms.
All that you've established is that you're a gun-nut who cares more about having a gun rather than looking at what the constitution actually says and having a sense of practically.
In regards to that asinine question about a nuclear weapon and chemical weapons, no average civilian should have access to nuclear weapons. That question was especially foolish because I highly doubt our government would bomb itself with nuclear weapons because they’ll more than likely send out troops and drones. Which is why CIVILIANS should be armed with automatic rifles at the very least. Hell, tear gas is a chemical weapon so yes, civilians should be able to have those too.
Ok, so you're admitting then that restricting weapons is ok, which discredits your entire argument and simply makes you look selfish.
That's a very unlikely scenario of the government ever doing such a thing. That one hypothetical isn't cause enough to put weapons capable of mass slaughter into the hands of every individual.
You're interpretation of what the amendment says is not only interpretation. The Constitution was made to be a living document for a reason.
Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Firstly, the amendment doesn't specify that citizens such as you or I are allowed to carry guns. It's talking about a well-regulated militia, not an individual.
Well regulated militia" clause clearly means the right to bear arms should only be given to these organized groups. This interpretation allows for only those in the official militia to carry guns legally, and say the federal government cannot abolish state militias.
Secondly, the right to "bear arms" does not specify guns at all. You're right to bear an arm is not infringed by restricting certain weapons. You're still able to bear arms, not bear all arms.
All that you've established is that you're a gun-nut who cares more about having a gun rather than looking at what the constitution actually says and having a sense of practically.
Ok, so you're admitting then that restricting weapons is ok, which discredits your entire argument and simply makes you look selfish.
That's a very unlikely scenario of the government ever doing such a thing. That one hypothetical isn't cause enough to put weapons capable of mass slaughter into the hands of every individual.
So let’s all acknowledge that you haven’t answered my questions yet, I’ll wait for that answer.
@Red: Lmfao do you even know the definition of a militia? It’s literally an organized group of armed civilians that are eligible for military service. So commoners such as you and I are at liberty to bear arms, assuming we are able-bodied. The fact that we have the right to bear arms throughout American history proves you’re wrong.
@Blue: Sounds like that’s a misinterpretation on your part, because that’s exactly what it is. Your trying to make this about nuclear arms while the world is talking about Assault rifles. Your desperate ass-pulls are dragging this out longer than it has to be. Like I said earlier, American civilians should be armed with assault rifles to combat military troops, if need be, at the very least.
@Bold: Lmfao according to you, the the right to “bear arms” also isn’t extended to nuclear weapons, right? And to make your scenario even more ridiculous, you completely ignored what I’d stated in that portion of the quote entirely. I said that since Tear gas and pepper spray are classified as chemical weapons, then they should be legal. Not to mention that you’re acting as if the government is handing out assault weapons to, as you stated, every individual.
People have their rights to purchase weapons if they so choose but let’s not forget that your initial comment insinuated that you believe that no one should be able to purchase weapons at all. How do you advocate that given the ban on guns throughout history in European and Asian countries where genocide ensued after the populace were stripped of their weapons? After all, you responded to my response to this comment:
Back on topic, the fact that it's legal to possess a weapon is wrong, I mean, if it's for protection than clearly something in the current society is wrong since Americans need protection from a weapon.
I'm not American but it's obviously not a local matter, it's a national matter, it's an American issue.
Police probably guns down a lot of people around the world if they think they behave thuggishly or something, but it's not often that it's targeting a certain race like in there.
