[Predictions] One Piece Manga Chapter 875 Discussion and 876 Predictions

[Punk Hazard]

I must have missed something what makes you say it wasn't an evil face?

Lookw nothing like her other evil faces and her speech was positive. Dont @ me.

 

[Joker]

Cool that Oda gives the minor character feats, not a fan of how the BMP are being treated, they haven't lived up to the hype to me. Overall besides that, decent chapter.

 

[chopstickchakra]

Lookw nothing like her other evil faces and her speech was positive. Dont @ me.

What happened to you as a child? You're so defensive all the time. I even acknowledged I may have missed something not everyone's coming at you 24/7.

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

Idk looks pretty similar to me, has a similar smile, eyebrows furrow similarly, but you said it as a fact so I thought maybe I missed something. I forgot you like to interject your perception as fact though. I could see the watery eyes or the hearts by the name as a reason to think it's not her evil face but neither are proof.

 

[LBeezy]

Hey guys, which translation do you think is more on point? JB or MS?

Cause *********** really makes Pudding sound more towards being evil in that last panel.. but *********** translation has positive words..

I'm so confused.. lol

 

[Olorin]

Lol @ Barto

Chapter played out a lot better than it sounded it would in spoilers. Glad the "evil Pudding face" wasn't actually an evil Pudding face after all. This is probably the first chapter in a bit that didn't feel like extending an arc that should have been over by now too, pretty solid 3-4/5.

Ppl almost always ***** about the spoilers, been years and they still dont get that a brief text =\= actual chapter

 

[Punk Hazard]

What happened to you as a child? You're so defensive all the time. I even acknowledged I may have missed something not everyone's coming at you 24/7.

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

Idk looks pretty similar to me, has a similar smile, eyebrows furrow similarly, but you said it as a fact so I thought maybe I missed something. I forgot you like to interject your perception as fact though. I could see the watery eyes or the hearts by the name as a reason to think it's not her evil face but neither are proof.

Sorry, I'll be sure to include "in my opinion" a couple hundred times per post since you need em scooped up in a spoon for you.

 

[Olorin]

Cool that Oda gives the minor character feats, not a fan of how the BMP are being treated, they haven't lived up to the hype to me. Overall besides that, decent chapter.

Why is everyone expecting the BMP to be above snd beyond, at the end of the day they should be comparable to the WBP, Marco is very strong but far feom top tier and id dropped fast after that, beyond the 4,5 impressive ones the rest were nothing special

If anything this has been consistent so far

 

[ssjelf]

Why is everyone expecting the BMP to be above snd beyond, at the end of the day they should be comparable to the WBP, Marco is very strong but far feom top tier and id dropped fast after that, beyond the 4,5 impressive ones the rest were nothing special

If anything this has been consistent so far

Hard to say if it is consistent. Marco and Jozu and vista were up against the strongest shichibukai and admirals and got beat after a long battle. Jack was up against both nekomamushi and inurashi and fought for 5 days without losing. Hard to make comparisons in that fight but luffy acknowledged inurashis strength without seeing him even fight, so he has to be up there in strength.

Meanwhile luffy and co are making a fool of the BMP including their top members. So at first glance they are disappointing. The real truth is that we don't have a good way of comparing the three yonkou crews yet so it's entirely possible this same scenario could happen to kaido too.

 

[arv993]

Why is everyone expecting the BMP to be above snd beyond, at the end of the day they should be comparable to the WBP, Marco is very strong but far feom top tier and id dropped fast after that, beyond the 4,5 impressive ones the rest were nothing special

If anything this has been consistent so far

what do you consider far from top tier? marco didnt get low diffed by an admiral. AND luffy and co arent top tiers so BMP shouldve been able to crush them by now but are repeatedly getting saved by plot. Oda is doing too many plot convenient things that cheapens the OP experience in this arc and that is a valid complaint.

Sorry, I'll be sure to include "in my opinion" a couple hundred times per post since you need em scooped up in a spoon for you.

i mean you have time for a lot of other nonsensical arguments so adding a imo cant be too much of chore can it?

 

[chopstickchakra]

Sorry, I'll be sure to include "in my opinion" a couple hundred times per post since you need em scooped up in a spoon for you.

Since you can't seem to control yourself from acting like your thoughts are fact and presenting them that way, you'll need to. Good job ignoring how it looks just like the other pictures too. And fyi saying something like "Glad it wasn't an evil face after all" implies there was some corroboration that the face made was in fact not evil, which there wasn't yet.

i mean you have time for a lot of other nonsensical arguments so adding a imo cant be too much of chore can it?

I'm sorry did you forget who you were talking to? Riker doesn't have opinions he only has facts.

 

[Punk Hazard]

what do you consider far from top tier? marco didnt get low diffed by an admiral. AND luffy and co arent top tiers so BMP shouldve been able to crush them by now but are repeatedly getting saved by plot. Oda is doing too many plot convenient things that cheapens the OP experience in this arc and that is a valid complaint.



i mean you have time for a lot of other nonsensical arguments so adding a imo cant be too much of chore can it?

Not my fault if someone is too dense to tell when something being presented is a fact, and when it's an opinion.

Since you can't seem to control yourself from acting like your thoughts are fact and presenting them that way, you'll need to. Good job ignoring how it looks just like the other pictures too. And fyi saying something like "Glad it wasn't an evil face after all" implies there was some corroboration that the face made was in fact not evil, which there wasn't yet.

I didn't address you posting the pictures since you decided to bog down your post with shots. I didn't think the face was evil because I didn't remember what the evil faces looked like, but if you didn't care enough about that point to present it without ad hominem, why should I?

 

[chopstickchakra]

Not my fault if someone is too dense to tell when something being presented is a fact, and when it's an opinion.



I didn't address you posting the pictures since you decided to bog down your post with shots. I didn't think the face was evil because I didn't remember what the evil faces looked like, but if you didn't care enough about that point to present it without ad hominem, why should I?

Because you made the claim that's how it works. If you make the claim you need to support it. And please you're the biggest example of ad hominem argument users around here, you constantly try to argue other people personally over the context.

This is not a statement of opinion "Glad the "evil Pudding face" wasn't actually an evil Pudding face after all." This reads as a statement of fact that has confirmation behind it's preconceived notions. Which never actually happened. You had it in your head that she wasn't evil here and then saw a pic that you felt confirmed that suspicion. For someone who instigates a lot of insults and loves to toss em out you sure seem to get awfully emotional when they come your way.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Because you made the claim that's how it works. If you make the claim you need to support it.

What the hell are you talking about? This wasn't a discussion about making unsupported claims, this was a conversation about me making a distinction in my post about what's supposed to be opinion, and what's supposed to be a fact.

And please you're the biggest example of ad hominem argument users around here, you constantly try to argue other people personally over the context.

Guarantee you can't find a single argument where I ignored/didn't address someone's claim directly and did nothing but insult them instead.

This is not a statement of opinion "Glad the "evil Pudding face" wasn't actually an evil Pudding face after all."

That's probably because it wasn't written to be a statement of opinion. I made that statement because I didn't remember the evil Pudding face correctly. It was written as a statement of fact, and it was incorrect. That's not a bad thing, that just means I was mistaken. You showed that I was mistaken by posting the other pictures, but you did so wrapped up with ad hominem. Like I said, you didn't care enough about the point to present it without taking shots, so I didn't respond to it and addressed the ad hominem.

For someone who instigates a lot of insults and loves to toss em out you sure seem to get awfully emotional when they come your way.

Except if I responded to someone's post both with ad hominem and addressing their point, and they ignored it to address the ad hominem like I did yours, I wouldn't fault them for it at all.