[Discussion] Cracker is stronger than Doffy
- Thread starter Our Lord Sasuke
- Start date
~Naruto&Itachi~
Active member
Awards
MadaraReturns
Active member
Awards
I read it bro, at the end of the page you sent here (page 2 i think) Howlett says "Cracker is stronger than Luffy though".
I don't like 2 or 3 vs 1 but it's just so you and Howlett will be cool with eachother
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
LBeezy has been tripping ever since he became a Luffy fanboy, forgive him
Rikudou Tobi
Active member
It's totally like Riker boy to say one information that completely contradict the other. Not that hard to catch him in his bs. Give luffy that solo win since Luffy also fought the seducing woods with co. before meeting Cracker.
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
You riding my **** way too much to be forgetting the "no homo" part of your post.
Itachi Minato
Active member
Pretty sure riker/howlett has always been pretty adamant luffy did not and could not have beaten doffy alone.
As for this post, I really don't think there is enough evidence to say who is stronger between doffy and cracker, but I want to believe it is cracker. Luffy only beat him because Nami figured out a weakness and was able to continuously eat crackers soldiers to create a method to win. Without Nami, luffy would have been beat the first time he ran out of G4 and he had to use it very early in the fight.
Luffy seemed to do ok against doffy without G4 but obviously couldn't beat him alone either. But I do think luffy could hold out against doffy longer before using G4 than he did against cracker, which to me means cracker is stronger.
As for this post, I really don't think there is enough evidence to say who is stronger between doffy and cracker, but I want to believe it is cracker. Luffy only beat him because Nami figured out a weakness and was able to continuously eat crackers soldiers to create a method to win. Without Nami, luffy would have been beat the first time he ran out of G4 and he had to use it very early in the fight.
Luffy seemed to do ok against doffy without G4 but obviously couldn't beat him alone either. But I do think luffy could hold out against doffy longer before using G4 than he did against cracker, which to me means cracker is stronger.
Thanks bro.. but yeah we are cool. He just has a huge problem with being wrong.. and that's okay and all, because most of the time he's usually correct and logical, but then there's those moments when he either likes to troll, or he wants to play devil's advocate and argue/debate just for the sake of it.. and then there's certain times where he's completely proven wrong, yet he can't admit it.
I was just messing around in this thread, because of a conversation we were all having in the other thread..
If he doesn't want to own up to saying that Luffy brought down Doflamingo by himself, 1v1, then he needs to admit he was wrong.. simple as that.. or else, it's like my boy Rikudou Tobi said, and it'll just be a huge contradiction on Howlett's end. :bdpf:
Yeah bro.. he doesn't do it all the time, but when he does, man, it's bad.
I just don't like how whenever he's proven wrong, he can't just be cool and admit it.. smh
And it's funny, cause you're the only person in this thread so far that understands my point and gets the fact that I was joking around.. it seems like no one else here realizes how much he truly contradicted himself in the other thread.. lol
You stop trolling dude.
That's the point.
He contradicted the fk out of himself in the other thread.. that's why I'm messing around with him about it in this thread.
He needs to either admit that he's wrong about the Urouge/Brulee/Snack/Cracker/Luffy ordeal.. or he needs to admit that he agrees Luffy brought down Doflamingo by himself 1v1..
Or else, its one of the biggest contradictions he's displayed here in this OP section.
Plain and simple.
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
I never contradicted myself though. I acknowledged when talking to Chopstickchakra that Brulee's words were not 100% infallible and it was logical to DOUBT her words, but there wasn't enough proof to DISMISS her words.
You used Brulee commenting about something that happened outside of the woods to dismiss her comments about something inside the woods, which is flawed because: A) she lives in the woods B) She has eyes all over the island C) She's one of the main offenses when intruders are in the woods
You then tried to use other characters talking about something they have zero knowledge on to prove that Brulee talking about something that happened in the Seducing Woods, where it's her job to handle intruders, is unreliable. Anyone with a brain can see how illogical this is.
Like I told Chopstick, Brulee's word isn't 100% infallible, but you lack the proof needed to dismiss her comments. And no, Brulee talking about something OUTSIDE of the woods do not reduce her credibility on what happened INSIDE the woods.
Rikudou Tobi
Active member
Well you can't fix stupid, just ignore the idiot he loves to beg for attention. Even when you're intentionally ignoring the kid, he's too dense to comprehend that he's not wanted.
Bimbonium is the only other guy that seems to reason better sometimes.
Anyways we'll give Luffy that feat!
Last edited:
ArabianLuffy
Active member
Awards
Here are a theoretical scenarios:
1) Luffy and Doffy are in their finest health conditions, they go all out with their skills, powers and techniques. No interference. The result will be Doffy will win.
2) Same scenario between Luffy and Cracker. Pretty much Cracker will win.
3) Now Doffy and Cracker. Both are fine. Both are fully ready for battle. They use their DFs and Haki to fullest extent. No one will win. No one.
1) Luffy and Doffy are in their finest health conditions, they go all out with their skills, powers and techniques. No interference. The result will be Doffy will win.
2) Same scenario between Luffy and Cracker. Pretty much Cracker will win.
3) Now Doffy and Cracker. Both are fine. Both are fully ready for battle. They use their DFs and Haki to fullest extent. No one will win. No one.
Thanks for the advice bro.. It's such a waste of time going back and forth with someone who can never admit when they're wrong. I guess I just need to learn how to stop feeding into him when he's trolling.. lol
And thanks also for being the only one in this thread to actually understand and realize what was sarcastic and a joke and what was serious..
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
Everyone realized what you were saying though, only one person was dumb enough to agree to it.
Classic Variah Method though: Can't refute what they said? Say they're a trolling fool so you can save your fragile ego
ArabianLuffy
Active member
Awards
Apparently, you and Love Cook kinda have it rough with LBeezy to get through in debate. You guys make me laugh.
Punk Hazard
Active member
Awards
ArabianLuffy
Active member
Awards
I know. Good to have you and Love Cook around. Otherwise, this section would be in chaos. lol