Why NATO doesn't stop ISIS?

[Our Lord Sasuke]

Why doesn't the NATO and the world destroy ISIS? When will we wipe out ISIS? Why is it so hard to wipe out ISIS? I mean now

 

[Ōkami]

Because certain nations profit off the existence of ISIS.

 

[JStar King]

Because they are behind ISIS and probably using it as a ruse to make money.

 

[nak]

coz they are useful to their agenda i guess.. they were created by the CIA afterall

 

[Joon]

Because of certain nations profit off the existence of ISIS.

Because they are behind ISIS and probably using it as a ruse to make money.

coz they are useful to their agenda I guess.. they were created by the CIA afterall

It is a Islamic Pipeline. It's lead by the US and Saudi Arabia. It runs through Iran into Syria. Russia and obviously, the Syria government is against it.

 

[Mori Jin]

It is a Islamic Pipeline. It's lead by the US and Saudi Arabia. It runs through Iran into Syria. Russia and obviously, the Syria government is against it.

No it ain't actually, it was made and estabilshed by CIA and Mossad agents. Which then recruited idiot "Muslims" who believed in this so called Islamic State. Scratch that add the UK into it as well.

 

[Joon]

No it ain't actually, it was made and established by CIA and Mossad agents. Which then recruited idiot "Muslims" who believed in this so-called Islamic State. Scratch that adds the UK into it as well.

They would not have created or recruited extreme/radical Muslims without an agenda. Obviously, that agenda is oil.

 

[Mori Jin]

They would not have created or recruited extreme/radical Muslims without an agenda. Obviously, that agenda is oil.

Of course it is. Free oil from a land that's filled with chaos, who wouldn't want that?

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Because Syria is an ally of Russia and fundamental to Russia's and Iran's involvement in the middle East. The US and its NATO buddies use the fact Assad is shia so they can get Sunni Extremists to fight against him. This is also where Saudi Arabia and Turkey comes in since they hate Iran and shia Muslims, as Iran hates Saudi Arabia and Sunni muslims. Oh, and Iran is also a major threat to Israel as well so Israel had lobbyists pushing for the destabilizing of Syria to get to them. ISIS isn't as big of a problem to the US as much as a stable Syria is so they'd rather have Syria fall. Plus the fact that ISIS is an Islamic extremist group gets the people to focus on them rather than the US and Russia's little cold war.

Why do you think US all of a sudden cared for Syria's 'human rights violations' yet there are a lot of other countries that violate them. Also, the US used the same exact story in Libya and Iraq, talk about being lazy. Ghadafi was killed because he was trying to use gold as currency and encourage all African nations to do so and make their own EU. This would ruin the US dollar. Sadam Hussain was a tool for the US who became too dangerous for them. He was a bad dude but the US chose to get rid of their tool before they could have another Iran or North Korea type figure who wanted to nationalize his oil. Syria is a sunni majority nation, it wouldn't make sense and is uncharacteristic of Assad to even bother to kill his own people.

I don't know why you guys think oil is the only foreign interest for war. It's secondary in this case.

 

[HashiraMadara]

Because Syria is an ally of Russia and fundamental to Russia's and Iran's involvement in the middle East. The US and its NATO buddies use the fact Assad is shia so they can get Sunni Extremists to fight against him. This is also where Saudi Arabia and Turkey comes in since they hate Iran and shia Muslims, as Iran hates Saudi Arabia and Sunni muslims. Oh, and Iran is also a major threat to Israel as well so Israel had lobbyists pushing for the destabilizing of Syria to get to them. ISIS isn't as big of a problem to the US as much as a stable Syria is so they'd rather have Syria fall. Plus the fact that ISIS is an Islamic extremist group gets the people to focus on them rather than the US and Russia's little cold war.

Why do you think US all of a sudden cared for Syria's 'human rights violations' yet there are a lot of other countries that violate them. Also, the US used the same exact story in Libya and Iraq, talk about being lazy. Ghadafi was killed because he was trying to use gold as currency and encourage all African nations to do so and make their own EU. This would ruin the US dollar. Sadam Hussain was a tool for the US who became too dangerous for them. He was a bad dude but the US chose to get rid of their tool before they could have another Iran or North Korea type figure who wanted to nationalize his oil. Syria is a sunni majority nation, it wouldn't make sense and is uncharacteristic of Assad to even bother to kill his own people.

I don't know why you guys think oil is the only foreign interest for war. It's secondary in this case.

^ Holy grail right here again.

I wouldn't know much about Islamic states but I know why Gaddafi was killed and Former of South Africa and African Union President Thabo Mbeki was sacked. Thabo former UK economist graduate teamed up with Gaddafi in what was going to be an investment agenda of "Africans don't need external help with African problems". The goal was to nationalize African outsource mines(Anglo American, now UK major owned De Beers) etc and use Gold mass to form an African currency resembling Euro. Now that was a deal breaker to the Americans because it meant

* No more cheap export from cheap African currencies
* No cheap labour from Africans
* Loss of continuous income from African resources
* Loss of leverage(greater currency means greater economy meaning more focus on inventions than starvation etc)
* Expensive visits to African countries during tourism because currency leverage is lost

If you notice Libya went spiral after Gaddafi and South Africa employed a clueless president who never graduated from High School