You don't think Zoro > Cracker?
Do you?
As for the battle the SH wins S2 and maybe S1.
You don't think Zoro > Cracker?
How am I lining up fights? I'm mentioning how one character becomes ineffective in the grand scheme of this battle because of the abilities possessed by more than 2 of his opponents, you're choosing to put so much emphasis on Nami specifically.No again you don't get what I'm saying. Because an other event in the manga showed that Nami was being handled by the enraged army in a matter of minutes.
She will probably have a hard time spraying Cracker when she is in a book or mirror world.
You perfectly line up the fights like how you want them to play out. But it's a war, look how hectic marineford was. It's much more likely that cracker floods the battlefield with his clones while he is safe in a distance. And some unknown Fishmen aren't taking down those clones. Jimbei maybe, and Nami needs help to deliver the final blows.
But the bottom line is that you said Cracker is a non factor, which is bullshit because it takes a lot of power and time to take him down. While BM still has at least 17 other strong people running around.
You're forgetting that wet Cracker clones still needed a G4 to be eaten :sdo:A. Because that's her main form of attack why would you assume it wouldn't be discovered again if we go under the assumption it's her first encounter? B. Jinbe and the upper Fishmen pirates all have FMK which produces water. So between those two points Cracker's biscuits(which is the best thing about him in a fight) are ineffective.
Nami not having the vivre card isn't as impactful since she has literally thousands of foot soldiers from the fleet, the Heart Pirates, the Minks and all she has a good body of cover. Plus her attacks are area based attacks and she doesn't need to be in proximity once they start she can set up an attack and move.
90% wouldn't be able to deal with it if they're able to stay dry which in this scenario is unlikely.
It took Luffy ALONE 11 hours but it wouldn't be Luffy alone attacking him so it wouldn't be 11 hours. How long do you think it would take Luffy to beat a Cracker if he could happen to bypass all the biscuit soldiers seeing as he took him out pretty easy once he actually hit him? Seems to me Law would make that a pretty easy feat.
No, Luffy ate them without any gears.You're forgetting that wet Cracker clones still needed a G4 to be eaten :sdo:
Yes sir.
Do you?
As for the battle the SH wins S2 and maybe S1.
Oh okay..Absolutely not.
What stalker said, a normal bite force was enough to break a soggy biscuit.You're forgetting that wet Cracker clones still needed a G4 to be eaten :sdo:
I'm pretty sure he beats him mid-high diff..Zoro is not beating Cracker.......
I'm pretty sure you need to reread the manga...I'm pretty sure he beats him mid-high diff..
One Piece is such a great manga, re-reading it is always a pleasure..I'm pretty sure you need to reread the manga...
I'm pretty sure he loses med-dif while struggling to beat a clone.I'm pretty sure he beats him mid-high diff..
His swordsmanship shits on those biscuit clones boiI'm pretty sure he loses med-dif while struggling to beat a clone.
If G4's brute strength couldn't shit on them his swordsmanship isn't doing shit.His swordsmanship shits on those biscuit clones boi
What was Cracker's weapon of choice?If G4's brute strength couldn't shit on them his swordsmanship isn't doing shit.
Irrelevant what's Cracker's weapon of choice, he doesn't need to be the individually superior swordsman. Never said brute strength was above slicing but in terms of power G4 Luffy is above Zoro's paygrade.What was Cracker's weapon of choice?
And brute strength doesn't always mean > slicing
I agree with G4 Luffy > ZoroIrrelevant what's Cracker's weapon of choice, he doesn't need to be the individually superior swordsman. Never said brute strength was above slicing but in terms of power G4 Luffy is above Zoro's paygrade.