- Joined
- Apr 7, 2014
- Messages
- 5,721
- Reaction score
- 242
Rational Wiki said:Radical feminism is a branch of feminism distinguished by its study of patriarchy as an end in itself rather than a secondary aspect of some larger intersectional system
Radical feminism is a branch of feminism distinguished by its study of patriarchy as an end in itself rather than a secondary aspect of some larger intersectional system
Study.com said:The different branches of feminism were all controversial for their times, but none of them were as provocative with their theories and as extreme with their solutions as radical feminism. In this lesson, we will unpack the oftentimes fanatical and uncompromising ideals of radical feminism.
Definition of Radical Feminism
Radical feminist beliefs are based on the idea that the main cause of women's oppression originates from social roles and institutional structures being constructed from male supremacy and patriarchy.
Caragillis.com said:Radical feminism promotes the basis for many of the ideas of feminism
So we can stop with the strawmans now
Wow, Kibouu as usual resorts to being a troll.
Instead of opening your mouth and making arguments or posts that fail to add zero merit to the debate, maybe ask me why I'm doing what I'm doing? I made it clear I'm not debating him anymore and yet when I make this clear, he'll respond to my post even if I was debating to someone else. I don't know if you noticed but he failed to respond to my posts prior to me threatening to ignore him nor did he present proof prior to the same threat. How do you remedy this issue? Troll at least it's worked for me with others. You act like I haven't been debating him this whole time when he has yet to disprove my statements you also act like he doesn't have a history of not addressing arguments that dismantle his logic or just not addressing them altogether. I love how people like you just love being with the majority or popular viewpoint.
Feminazi: Man-hating, believes women are superior
Feminist: Someone who believes the sexes should be treated equally.
This whole propaganda that the two are the same is something born of ignorance (wilful or not), or the asinine ramblings of a child looking to be edgy or for attention. Margaret Atwood is a feminist, Susan Brownmiller is a feminazi. Good grief, Wollstonecraft would be spinning in her grave if she witnessed the radical branch of feminism that had sprung.
Please stop, you sound like Riker and I'm refraining myself to call you what I call him because this post fits the context very well. You're essentially saying that a Lutheran is correct to call a Catholic out on not being a Christian because some of their beliefs differ. Riker makes the (stupid) argument that (all) feminism are SUPPOSED TO BE about gender equality (all the one point, even saying it was the same as egalitarianism) and if they are not, then they aren't feminist, yet there is white feminism (something supposed true feminist of today don't even like) that only cares about the problems of white women and black feminism that share the same belief but for their respective race. This by example already shows that there is not only a contradiction of feminism but also shows that what Riker does and will continue to do, is the No Scottsman fallacy that SJWS love to spew so much. As to prior examples I gave, it's all the same thing
He strikes me as the kind that just likes to wind themselves up about things that piss them off.
He's adding nothing new to the debate and is just a troll.
So according to your logic, I can't talk about stuff I don't like in the general discussion thread? Pot meet kettle especially when the tone of your posts show contempt for discussions similar to this which have been conveyed before. I'm adding nothing to the thread? Riker hasn't disprove anything I've said thus far only maybe a little as me retracting my statement that nobody undermines rape (which shouldn't have had to been elucidated based on discussions I've had in the past about rape) so if he's not adding anything what makes you think I can?
Hey, here's a fun thought. The literal existence of a 'rape culture' doesn't matter at all. It's irrelevant. What I do see is a number of men trying to downplay and invalidate the importance of sexual assault, victim blaming...perpetuating all this sh*t into a nice little toxic cycle. back and wonder where this intolerance in you towards victims of crime is coming from. [/I]
Good, then leave it at that and call it something else. Like Fiji said, feminist are trying to use a feminist coined term to argue and trying to impose it regular societal use as the "standard" when there is not only no proof for this, but also calling everyone they argue against as either wrong or contributing to it
"Rape culture includes jokes, TV, music, advertising, legal jargon, laws, words and imagery, that make violence against women and sexual coercion seem so normal that people believe that rape is inevitable. Rather than viewing the culture of rape as a problem to change, people in a rape culture think about the persistence of rape as “just the way things are.”
"Other drivers of Western culture include Latin, Celtic, Germanic and Hellenic ethnic and linguistic groups. Today, the influences of Western culture can be seen in almost every country in the world."
My former quote is coming from a feminist website. The way they described it is exactly what a culture is. They even go ahead and say culture of rape, implying that there is a culture (the same as the context I'm using it in) of rape
Please answer me one thing, where is the harm in treating such a gross, personal crime more seriously? A crime that is completely commonplace in even the most casual, chill places in the world.
back and wonder where this intolerance in you towards victims of crime is coming from. [/I]
You act as if people don't do this you act as if people don't speak out against it which is why I'm baffled on what you people are arguing anyway. Aren't you aware that always a minority that is against what is perceived to be right, or do you not know how life works? Unless any of you with statistics can prove the majority of people think like this in American society, then it is not a culture
The general public doesn't do this. If we want to make this argument we can attribute this to everything bad in society
The two sides with this debate are rapists and non-rapists, not men VS women.
I don't know how this got twisted into some hate attempt against 'the evil feminazi menace' this forum (and the gender-obsessed internet in general) seems to be so pissed at. back and wonder where this intolerance in you towards victims of crime is coming from. [/I]
Nobody made this argument, not one. Feminist have everything to do with this argument because they are the ones pushing it
Psst guys, just like the OP- you're tormenting yourselves with this image of a person that doesn't really exist at all. The SJW is a creation of the internet and is almost non-existent in real life...and for those with real life experience? I think you know this. Both genders are at a playground level Boys VS Girls argument and it's immature and embarrassing. What does the real world has a lot of? Intolerance.
back and wonder where this intolerance in you towards victims of crime is coming from. [/I]
SJW became a pejorative the same way the term troll has became one for a particular group of people. It's slang term that's obviously not a part (an official part) of English vocabulary (but of English vernacular) for a certain group of people. For you to deny this is for you to make your statement about me being a troll as irrelevant as me calling you an SJW. Also thank you for not addressing my points and instead resort to ad hominems, further proving my point about SJW's logic and argumentation
No matter your stance on this issue- you guys gotta sit back and wonder where this intolerance in you towards victims of crime is coming from.
The fact that everyone doesn't think the same and everyone is their own persons. Guess what? That's the way life is, if someone doesn't want to change their mindset, then they aren't going to. Like I said before, any of have to prove it's the majority that think like this.
At bold: Did you, by accident convey your true feelings towards this topic or are you just raging your response as fast as you can?
Assuming it was a typo; Sure, women can dress more moderately for their safety but then telling them they should do so is taking away the attention from the perpetrator to the victim. You have to address and condemn the perpetrators, not the victims. This is another reason why the term 'rape culture' stands. You're still pretty much blaming the victims. Widen that bubble of thought of yours so you'll grasp the concept.
.
YowYan: Telling someone to be safe is perpetuating rape culture? Just the same way as telling people to eat slow is perpetuating choking culture right? This argument falls flat on its face to assume people who do this even put the victim at blame and instead don't fully blame the rapist. In other words labelling something a factor doesn't mean your blaming anyone. This is no different then saying, take precaution when walking in the street when you have the right of way because people can still hit you due to the lack of care and then someone gets hit. That's not an automatic assumption that the person (s) conveying this is even blaming the victim of the accident.
There's colleges near me handing out rape whistles and statistics saying that 1 out of 5 women will be raped and 1 out of 16 men will be raped on college campuses.
And people are legit denying that "rape culture"exists
Only good thing about this thread is that it weeds out the ignorant pieces of shit
Rollin: So because they handed you (false) statistics and whistles then automatically that means it's true? So I guess the cops shooting all the black people since they hold the highest crime statistics makes it just huh?
Last edited:
