Political debate it's long, but you'd have to read it all

[Fire Goddess]

My first complaint, next will be politics and how did either candidate get in to run in the election, let alone be there.... I just can't picture Trump rolling out of bed for a nuclear bomb threat, he'd hit a button thinking it's alarm clock and accidentally cause world war 3 starting with Mexico, I hope he got that wall up in time, to stop the bomb if it could or at least the impact.

I have many complaints about Hillary too. I'm sticking to googly eyes on a rock and voting for that... It has all the qualities of a good president:
It's strong
Doesn't get pushed around easily
Remains still and calm even in the midst of war
Can take a hit
The rock will start his own path, as the rock gets on a roll, it will crush all in his path that stand in it's way
It's faster than Donald Trump is for making decisions and being prepared
It has more resilience than Hillary Clinton, a rock can bounce back, not Hillary.
It is a given that Donald Trump has a bad temperament, not by what he says (because he said he has a good temperament and that is what you need a good leader) but his temperament is clear in his actions, talking loudly over Hillary, calling her a liar, but she hadn't even finished the sentence, and if he were to hear it all, maybe he would have no reason to call her liar.

Trump is a proven liar. But he covers his tax returns and we don't know the reason why. Maybe he didn't pay his debt (he is also rich though) or taxes, not everyone can or does... but is that as important as official confidential emails from the government while you play a big role in what is going on? And for her to be held above the law because of status?

Trump lies, we get it, but is his opinion of the war before he was against one of the most important things in being president? With today's world, we need to be able to hide information and that is something you can rely on Trump for. However, you also need a president you can trust, who doesn't lie to the U.S. some information does need to be withheld from the media because of the internet and other and who can come across the information and what they can and will do with it. I don't think Hillary would put out the entire plan on to defeat ISIS on her website, and I actually think it's a trap for ISIS.

I like the idea of lowering taxes because it will allow businesses to expand and give more jobs to the U.S. citizens. I don't like the way Trump treats.... basically everybody. In his eyes women are ugly if they are small uptop, and acts women are beneath him. Trump treats those of minority or anyone like crap. We need a president who will be nice to his country and not lie to us.

If Trump were president, and went over seas to talk to any country, think about it, we watched him not prepare for the debate, would he prepare for a negotiation? He lied throughout the whole debate, would he be honest with the other country, (if the president isn't honest it could cause complications with the negotiation or at it's worst war)? Trump speak over Hillary unable to maintain control of his temperament, what would this possibly cause in a negotiation with another country? The debate was held for who will become president, and we all saw what both candidates, are like, for fighting over being the president of the country they both stand for and love. They are both on the same side, the side of USA, but we have to think what we see in the debate that is more like a debate between teammates, but once in office is what matters. Is Donald Trump's constant lying, talking over Hillary, temperament, quick with insults if annoyed, good in office? Or will his sudden insults, lies, and temperament lead the USA to war? We all would have to suffer for his stupidity.

Hillary wants to raise taxes, and other things I don't agree with. She was careless with confidential email, and that is important. If she allows in more immigrants will we have room in are country? As much as I want Mexico and other countries to see things the way the united states does, and not have wars and other problems, like lack of education and food, if our country becomes over populated will we do what China did, only 1 child allowed? Will our country lose money and become more poor? Would one of these president candidates come up with something new, and useful? Anyway we could talk to Mexico, try to stop the war, or even ask to just join the land, make Mexico a part of USA, and expand the United States. If we can get Mexico to agree to it. It solves USA over population, money, resources, and stop the war in Mexico. Hillary isn't good for office either, although she has a good temperament, and would maintain a cool in a negotiation, she would be easily persuaded and taken advantage of, due to her timid and kind nature. We won't have war, but we could have been persuaded out of a lot of things, getting a lot less for the value. Both the candidates should start pulling themselves together, and get with the program, both prepare like they have won, because there are things going on, and we need a president ready or even doing so early, before their term... It's not the election the candidates should focus on anymore, it's the USA. A lot things need to be taken care of, don't just wait until you're in the white house, start earlier, I want to know more about what the candidates have to offer for my country.

 

[nefraiko]

usa has in my opinion come to a point where democracy doesn't work anymore as a governance system. USA have to think of a new, more sophisticated governance system because democracy is obsolete for this country.

 

[HashiraMadara]

usa has in my opinion come to a point where democracy doesn't work anymore as a governance system. USA have to think of a new, more sophisticated governance system because democracy is obsolete for this country.

That's why Britain stuck to some pseudo-Monarchy

 

[nefraiko]

That's why Britain stuck to some pseudo-Monarchy

yes, to each stage of developpement their is an optimal governance system.
for tribes their should be only one chief that is the strongest and feared and obeyed
and then the kingdoms were the best governance systems in one point o hystory
but as countrys became more developped kingdoms became obsolete, so new governance systems emerged, batteled and democracy emerged victorious as it was the optimal choice
but now we witness a stage of developpement in some countries likes the USA where democracy is outdated, and where money based economy is ouuutdated


governance theorists talk about a natural selection between governance systems, I think that in the futur some new systems will be born, like the ressource based economy and beat democracy and capitalism in countries like the USA

but, oh god in countries like morocco we starve for democracy, **** the king...

 

[HashiraMadara]

yes, to each stage of developpement their is an optimal governance system.
for tribes their should be only one chief that is the strongest and feared and obeyed
and then the kingdoms were the best governance systems in one point o hystory
but as countrys became more developped kingdoms became obsolete, so new governance systems emerged, batteled and democracy emerged victorious as it was the optimal choice
but now we witness a stage of developpement in some countries likes the USA where democracy is outdated, and where money based economy is ouuutdated


governance theorists talk about a natural selection between governance systems, I think that in the futur some new systems will be born, like the ressource based economy and beat democracy and capitalism in countries like the USA

but, oh god in countries like morocco we starve for democracy, **** the king...

Democracy here we say f*ck the President he is dumb as f*ck. What USA are experiencing right now, we passed it in 2009 :sdo:
BTW Capitalism will never end, leeches prevail regardless of what ERA.