They should. However... it seems that after utilising other nations wealth and people to build up their own and at the expense of tose people; they dont want them anymore. Their job is done so they expect them to just go back where they came from. Taking no responsibility and benefiting from the wealth created whilst continuing to drain the countries of the resources.
I'd think that after having done all of that they should be the last to be complaining about foreign people in thei land.
it's all about economics.
western countries have built their prosperity by stealing the wealth of all the others countries, and is still doing so. and now when people of these stolen countries flee to better life, built on the shoulders and dead bodies of their fathers, the western countries don't welcome them. of course, it's not in their interest.
it's all about scarcity, supremacie, war, economics.
don't give me that crap of open minded westeners advanced civilization. principles, united nations, law, it's all bullshit.
we're living in a jungle.
but what if we could supress scarcity ?
Oh?
Singapore. Hong Kong. Macau.
All three were colonized by Europeans.
All three were barren wastelands that had and still have virtually zero natural resources.
And yet - all three are now wealthier and enjoy higher standards of living than your average European country.
You kids talk about economics but you seem to understand nothing about that subject; in particular, one of its few reliable and accurate models of the real world - which mathematically demonstrates that long-run economic growth is not driven by labour and capital:
You must be registered for see links
Notice that while the capital function K plays an important role in the economic output function Y, the growth of Y and therefore the economy always converges to an equilibrium, regardless of capital. There is only one, and only one, thing that can increase economic output per worker in the long run - and that is the growth of technology, the term g in the model.
All European countries, with the partial exception of those unfortunate Eastern European states that were afflicted with communism (actually even they experienced significant growth, it's just that it was severely stunted compared to the west), have grown continuously since the industrial revolution. They did not reach a static equilibrium, and the highest economic growth rates precipitated in the late 20th century, long after Europeans supposedly 'stole' capital from you.
And likewise once communism was abandoned, East Asian countries, regardless of their initial resources (in fact East Asia is probably the most resource deficient part of the world humans inhabit), have exploded with economic growth.
The problem for you Africans and Muslims is that the term g is pretty much entirely a function of 'human capital' and that in turn is delimited by national cognitive ability.
You can have all the capital in the world but you will not enjoy first world living standards unless you have first world intelligence. Oil rich gulf Arab countries (Saudi, Qatar, UAE, Oman etc) have gotten around that problem by hiring intelligent foreigners to do all the infrastructure building for them. But they have failed to develop real economies outside the export of oil and once that black gold runs out, those countries will begin a downward spiral into the third world standards of living which is their potential.
By contrast nations like Japan, no matter how deficient they are in resources, will, by virtue of the high intelligence, and therefore human capital, of her people, find the means to first world living standards (Japan currently does so with its high-tech manufacturing in which it leads the world).
