Why should I believe in the God?

[bajram]

It's not really credible when a bigot calls other people bigots.

That post was like the elementary schools students getting roasted but getting back with something like "ur.... ur .... ur mom"

Cmon man u can do better, that post had cringe written all over it.

 

[Arian]

im just gonna leave this one here. Lol i still just cant believe how naive one must be...

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

 

[Marin]

That post was like the elementary schools students getting roasted but getting back with something like "ur.... ur .... ur mom"

Cmon man u can do better, that post had cringe written all over it.

Oh I did. Don't worry tho, it'll come to you. Eventually...

 

[Legendary Saiyan]

Actually, he is. In saying the forum is filled with bigots and the sort he's undermining the existence of people who're educated on the topic and could provide quality input (basically those who should be posting in a section like this) which makes his statement fallacious as these people will provide input necessarry. Alternative meaning would be that he's stating everyone here is a bigot and a prepuberscent which again makes him a bigot thus rendering his statement worthless.

Got it?

Fair enough but he never said everyone is a bigot. Just that the forum is filled with bigots. Which was why I said he's not wrong at my previous post.

 

[Marin]

Fair enough but he never said everyone is a bigot. Just that the forum is filled with bigots. Which was why I said he's not wrong at my previous post.

If he didn't say everyone is a bigot then he's implying that there are people who will provide quality input so there's your reason for makinh a thread like this.

 

[Legendary Saiyan]

If he didn't say everyone is a bigot then he's implying that there are people who will provide quality input so there's your reason for makinh a thread like this.

Ah good point there.

 

[Srom777]

No I don't really feel that way because there is a reason to believe in God. You're wrong about how nothing in the Bible has ever been proven. There have been many things that the Bible knew before scientists even found out about it, and archaeological evidence of stuff that were in the Bible. Also we have more secular sources that prove Jesus existed out of the Bible as well. You take away the Bible, and you still have evidence that Jesus existed.

 

[Arian]

No I don't really feel that way because there is a reason to believe in God. You're wrong about how nothing in the Bible has ever been proven. There have been many things that the Bible knew before scientists even found out about it, and archaeological evidence of stuff that were in the Bible. Also we have more secular sources that prove Jesus existed out of the Bible as well. You take away the Bible, and you still have evidence that Jesus existed.

lol talk about bias. lets ignore the fact they claim the earth is like 6k years old, adam and eve, ****ing noahs arc which doesnt make any sense and doenst mention many animals they didnt know back then, flat earth, earth centered universe and the list goes on..... yea the bible is totaly truth bro.

 

[Srom777]

lol talk about bias. lets ignore the fact they claim the earth is like 6k years old, adam and eve, ****ing noahs arc which doesnt make any sense and doenst mention many animals they didnt know back then, flat earth, earth centered universe and the list goes on..... yea the bible is totaly truth bro.

What's bias about it? Yes, all of that indeed happened. Except the Bible doesn't say the world is flat rather it says it's round. Isaiah 40:22.

 

[Chakra Wizard]

lol talk about bias. lets ignore the fact they claim the earth is like 6k years old, adam and eve, ****ing noahs arc which doesnt make any sense and doenst mention many animals they didnt know back then, flat earth, earth centered universe and the list goes on..... yea the bible is totaly truth bro.

You do realize every single species on this planet had to originate from a single or pair of organisms before growing into a huge population? Humans are no different.

The 6000 year theory comes from theologists adding the listed lifespans of biblical figures and stated time gaps (i.e. 300 years between Joseph and Moses). Yes, God forbid the Bible (which is written by man) doesn't leave a lot of things out.

If one believes in the God-given abilities certain of the prophets had, the only biblical tale that truly defies logic on a debatable scale is Noah's Ark and the Great Flood. No one knew how time passed back then, so Noah certainly wasn't 500 years-old, and it's been proven that the size of the Ark compared to the number of species back then was workable, as well as other questions relating to its functions. The only thing left to question is how the Flood would've affected the Earth's geology. And again, people are welcome to create their own theories.

Going back to the "man-written Bible" point, I'm so sick of these age-old theories about the shape and location of the Earth being brought up when EVERYONE thought that way until people like Copernicus and Galileo began exploring the idea. Of course Isaiah talked about "the disc of the earth" because that's the way he was taught to believe the Earth looked. Only God is omniscient. People are not, not even the prophets.

What's bias about it? Yes, all of that indeed happened. Except the Bible doesn't say the world is flat rather it says it's round. Isaiah 40:22.

Hate to break it to you, man, but the "circle of the Earth" is also translated as "disc" (as I said to Arian). Isaiah referred to a circle as in a "flat disc", not a sphere. Kudos to you for trying to talk to this fool, but you're a bit misinformed there.

 

[Srom777]

You do realize every single species on this planet had to originate from a single or pair of organisms before growing into a huge population? Humans are no different.

The 6000 year theory comes from theologists adding the listed lifespans of biblical figures and stated time gaps (i.e. 300 years between Joseph and Moses). Yes, God forbid the Bible (which is written by man) doesn't leave a lot of things out.

If one believes in the God-given abilities certain of the prophets had, the only biblical tale that truly defies logic on a debatable scale is Noah's Ark and the Great Flood. No one knew how time passed back then, so Noah certainly wasn't 500 years-old, and it's been proven that the size of the Ark compared to the number of species back then was workable, as well as other questions relating to its functions. The only thing left to question is how the Flood would've affected the Earth's geology. And again, people are welcome to create their own theories.

Going back to the "man-written Bible" point, I'm so sick of these age-old theories about the shape and location of the Earth being brought up when EVERYONE thought that way until people like Copernicus and Galileo began exploring the idea. Of course Isaiah talked about "the disc of the earth" because that's the way he was taught to believe the Earth looked. Only God is omniscient. People are not, not even the prophets.



Hate to break it to you, man, but the "circle of the Earth" is also translated as "disc" (as I said to Arian). Isaiah referred to a circle as in a "flat disc", not a sphere. Kudos to you for trying to talk to this fool, but you're a bit misinformed there.

A disc is still round though. Also in other translations it says sphere, and not circle. I'm not misinformed. I know what I'm talking about.

 

[lagala]

In the beginning there was nothing, wich exploded. "Bang!" - and the entire universe was formed, including all living things, and man, who can contemplate it all. If that is what you believe, then yes, you believe in magic. You believe in something that has never been seen, and never will. It is a modern religious myth.

 

[Chakra Wizard]

A disc is still round though. Also in other translations it says sphere, and not circle. I'm not misinformed. I know what I'm talking about.

The majority say a circle, though, man. And I didn't say it wasn't round. There's lots of old interpretations that show a round plane with the ocean pouring out into oblivion.

 

[Your Creepy Stalker]

In the beginning there was nothing, wich exploded. "Bang!" - and the entire universe was formed, including all living things, and man, who can contemplate it all. If that is what you believe, then yes, you believe in magic. You believe in something that has never been seen, and never will. It is a modern religious myth.

In the begginning, there was a singularity (probably), which rapidlly expanded (for reasons unknown), and over trillions of years, stars and planets slowly formed by stuff clumping together, and on one out of quintillions of these planets, the conditions for life were met and then a lot of stuff happened. Now please do actual research before posting. Or you will end up just like me.

 

[Flakez]

In the beginning there was nothing, wich exploded. "Bang!" - and the entire universe was formed, including all living things, and man, who can contemplate it all. If that is what you believe, then yes, you believe in magic. You believe in something that has never been seen, and never will. It is a modern religious myth.

You're mind-bogglingly stupid.

 

[Arian]

You do realize every single species on this planet had to originate from a single or pair of organisms before growing into a huge population? Humans are no different.


and this explains adam and eve how? so youre saying eve was actually born from the rib of adam? youre saying a talking snake seduced her to commit a sin? ***** please... pls tell me more about how evolution works.

The 6000 year theory comes from theologists adding the listed lifespans of biblical figures and stated time gaps (i.e. 300 years between Joseph and Moses). Yes, God forbid the Bible (which is written by man) doesn't leave a lot of things out.

so youre saying the bible(which is by the way the only source of anything that you guys call "proof") is indeed full of errors. so the words of god himself are wrong i take it? how convenient for you guys that everything thats wrong was supoosedly done by men while all the other stuff is "right". how do you differentiate between whats wrong and whats right? by the way: funfact. did you know there are about 10k differences between the oldest known bible and the regular one they spread around? seems legit bro.

If one believes in the God-given abilities certain of the prophets had, the only biblical tale that truly defies logic on a debatable scale is Noah's Ark and the Great Flood. No one knew how time passed back then, so Noah certainly wasn't 500 years-old, and it's been proven that the size of the Ark compared to the number of species back then was workable, as well as other questions relating to its functions. The only thing left to question is how the Flood would've affected the Earth's geology. And again, people are welcome to create their own theories.

first of all youre acknowledging how fake that story sounds. lol the ONLY story that defies logic!? im done here . so moses splitting the red sea is reasonable? xD jesus walking on water, curing blind people, making water to whine is totally legit. not to mention him turning into a zombie and coming back. as for noah: its funny (and convenient) how many unknown animals werent mentioned back then. i guess god didnt like them right? what happened to all the people who actually had boats themselfs?`people who lived up in the mountains? because **** logic right? people didnt knew how time passed back then? i call bullshit.

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

You must be registered for see links

they actually had a pretty good idea of how a year worked.

Going back to the "man-written Bible" point, I'm so sick of these age-old theories about the shape and location of the Earth being brought up when EVERYONE thought that way until people like Copernicus and Galileo began exploring the idea. Of course Isaiah talked about "the disc of the earth" because that's the way he was taught to believe the Earth looked. Only God is omniscient. People are not, not even the prophets.

you do know the ancient greek actually kinda knew about the earth being a spere?

You must be registered for see links

Hate to break it to you, man, but the "circle of the Earth" is also translated as "disc" (as I said to Arian). Isaiah referred to a circle as in a "flat disc", not a sphere. Kudos to you for trying to talk to this fool, but you're a bit misinformed there.

im sorry bro. but you, like all religious sheep, make no sense whatsoever. but **** logic, i guess. who needs logic when you have the bible/quran

 

[slimreaper]

im sorry bro. but you, like all religious sheep, make no sense whatsoever. but **** logic, i guess. who needs logic when you have the bible/quran

i'm in no way religious, but explain to me how you believe all matter in the universe came to be under the current law that matter can't be created or destroyed. GO ahead.

 

[Your Creepy Stalker]

i'm in no way religious, but explain to me how you believe all matter in the universe came to be under the current law that matter can't be created or destroyed. GO ahead.

It didn't, and that's just how Matter works. If it could be, would you be asking how matter came under the law that it can be created or destroyed?

 

[slimreaper]

It didn't, and that's just how Matter works. If it could be, would you be asking how matter came under the law that it can be created or destroyed?

if matter can't be created or destroyed how did all the matter in the universe come into existence? You shouldn't be asking me a question, my question was as straight forward as it gets

 

[Your Creepy Stalker]

if matter can't be created or destroyed how did all the matter in the universe come into existence? You shouldn't be asking me a question, my question was as straight forward as it gets

Oops, read the question wrong. Though you were asking why the law of conservation of matter existed.

I don't know. That's the only answer anyone should ever give, and if anyone says anything different, they are lying, or delusional, or both.