You see just because they are printed, it doesn't mean the supposed facts in it are absolute and only truth. Researchers have their own biases or focusing on a single aspect and not even interested in wider study.
I compared your conclusion which comes from a very limited focus to with another. I don't see how I insulted and baited you by quoting actual situation anymore than you did. I stated facts and linked the context. Do you guys not speak English there since you fail to understand my post properly? You come back with a knee jerk reaction instead just because I pointed out a couple of problems in your own country. I didn't even imply that was the whole truth unlike you.
You are right tons of people die around the world-
irony here was
You must be registered for see links
to died in one of the most well equipped hospital in the supposed first world country-where doctor watched her dying day by day and did NOTHING because of their religious belief that they took to extreme.She had much better chance of surviving in an Indian village lacking all medical facilities but an old but expert midwife than in that hospital.
And another irony is how you try to ignore the plight of women in your country so casually by declaring so many die around the world. A culture that has empathy with an animal even is not something you are capable of understanding- not with that attitude.
I hit a nerve it seems just by showing you the mirror.
I heard they were trying to finally fix abortion laws after getting severe international criticism along with domestic protest- did they actually pass the bill finally?
No more like ;
you : I can claim my shallow understanding of a country as the only truth.
Me: but it doesn't work that way- gives you two examples how partial facts are not 100% truth-
You: How dare you show me the mirror!! you insulted me and my country and baited me just by showing me how shallow and partial my knowledge is!!
In fact, your reaction makes me wonder if there was more truth in those news articles than I thought previously and it's a greater problem than I imagined.
An opinion can be replied by another. He derailed the thread with his uncalled for post- no one so far had tried to bash another country till he posted. Why he should even try to put down others if he cannot even tolerate legit comments against it? That's double standard. You maybe ok with a backhanded compliment by the guy but it doesn't work for me.
