[Discussion] Do You Consider Prostitution a Respectable Profession

[Alice in Noodleland]

That kind of thing is understandable. I mean it was a situation the child was forced into, they had no choice, and some might even continue in that profession because they were so damaged as a child, but this thread is basically on those who are well off, can work a normal job, but choose Prostitution

She said everyone :| (all inclusive)
I could change it to slave trafficker, but if I pursue this too much things could go off topic.

Regardless not all occupations or ppl deserve respect

Applies to some politicians in my home country. No wait. 95% of them.

 

[Angelic.]

Nasty

 

[iNotorious]

And some professions can make ppl unworthy of respect :|

Like they care :| that's why they are doing it :|

Gang raping women in prostitution rings to check their sexual stamina is a part of their profession. Respectable, then?

Acceptable in my standards.

 

[shelke]

Acceptable in my standards.

Acceptable is the word you would use for gangraping, slavery, *** trade and what not? Interesting.

No, but I've been crossing blades with slimreaper so much that I'm looking forward to something less demanding

slimreaper can be ... very hardheaded and difficult.

 

[ANiMUS]

Like they care :| that's why they are doing it :|



Acceptable in my standards.

We are talking about your and Chibi's view of them though. Not how they view themselves :|

Applies to some politicians in my home country. No wait. 95% of them.

Mam your home country is f*cked up :|

 

[Yubel]

Yeah, and the women take care of the childrearing and housekeeping (in this traditionalist view)

If not for that, the man would have to pay for someone to do it for him

Except that has nothing to do with prostitution and adding to the traditionalist example, men support the house that they're housekeeping. Also childbearing is a natural phenomena only females have the capacity for. It has nothing to do with prostitution either, stop the red herring.

 

[Claymantan]

Except that has nothing to do with prostitution and adding to the traditionalist example, men support the house that they're housekeeping. Also childbearing is a natural phenomena only females have the capacity for. It has nothing to do with prostitution either, stop the red herring.

The woman isn't having *** with the husband in any modern society just because he's paying for the rent XD

Similarly, the man isn't having *** with her because she's keeping his house clean or whatever XD

Your equivalency is the false one XD

And even in like, non-modern societies, men do things like take multiple wives and the OG wife is often not the one responsible for sexual favors either

So you're equivalency is still false, because you said most women

 

[Yubel]

The woman isn't having *** with the husband in any modern society just because he's paying for the rent XD

Similarly, the man isn't having *** with her because she's keeping his house clean or whatever XD

Your equivalency is the false one XD

And even in like, non-modern societies, men do things like take multiple wives and the OG wife is often not the one responsible for sexual favors either

So you're equivalency is still false, because you said most women

How do men get payed for having ***? Just answer that for me.

 

[Punk Hazard]

How do men get payed for having ***? Just answer that for me.

Why the **** do you even log on anymore?

 

[Claymantan]

How do men get payed for having ***? Just answer that for me.

You said most women were prostitutes.

I responded by saying "So, most men are prostitutes."

Because your logic requires that *** in the presence of monetary transfers necessarily means that the *** is a part of the monetary transfer.

Which is a false premise; you must demonstrate that this is true.

The work women do in the home has monetary value, because people pay other people for it in societies. Therefore, if *** in the presence of monetary transfers or their equivalents means that one is a prostitute, then men are also prostitutes.

The reality is that neither *** gets directly paid for having *** (in the context of relationships).

You were just trying to create a rule which does not apply unless you can demonstrate that it does.

In other words, your premise was your conclusion.

Thus, bad argument.

 

[Yubel]

You said most women were prostitutes.

I responded by saying "So, most men are prostitutes."

Because your logic requires that *** in the presence of monetary transfers necessarily means that the *** is a part of the monetary transfer.

Which is a false premise; you must demonstrate that this is true.

The work women do in the home has monetary value, because people pay other people for it in societies. Therefore, if *** in the presence of monetary transfers or their equivalents means that one is a prostitute, then men are also prostitutes.

The reality is that neither *** gets directly paid for having *** (in the context of relationships).

You were just trying to create a rule which does not apply unless you can demonstrate that it does.

In other words, your premise was your conclusion.

Thus, bad argument.

There is no instance where most men get money spent on them for having ***. The opposite is true for most women, prove me wrong.

 

[Claymantan]

There is no instance where most men get money spent on them for having ***. The opposite is true for most women, prove me wrong.

Prove yourself right. XD

What kind of lame argument is this: "I have a claim, it is true until proven wrong."

I've already shown you why your claim is fallacious without empirical evidence. XD

Show me that most women get paid specifically for having *** in various types of relationships that exist.

 

[HENI]

It's good to make money.

 

[shelke]

There is no instance where most men get money spent on them for having ***. The opposite is true for most women, prove me wrong.

Prove it right. Where is your sample? All you have is anecdotal evidence that suggests most women. Without backing up your claim, it is limited to your own Reality, and in no way translates into "most" women. It's not even an argument, but a tediously spun story.

 

[Chibiusa]

Get the hell outta here

LMAOOOOO fuk off *******

You would respect a rapist? :|

I didnt know rapist was a profession but okay

 

[~Ethereal~]

I rather be a bin woman than be a hooker.

 

[ANiMUS]

LMAOOOOO fuk off *******



I didnt know rapist was a profession but okay

It is :bdpf: who do you think breaks in those to be sold as *** slaves

 

[Edogawa]

Yubel is actually correct. A study conducted in the US showed that women would date financially successful men.

You must be registered for see links

Back on topic. It can't be a profession because it doesn't produce anything for society, except cons. That being said, I view it as a crime and there should be a persecution. It's sexual exploitation that is no different from *** slavery. Men who participate in this view women as a mere *** slave, thus degrading women and their image to men. Prostitutes are forced to take drugs in order to withstand *** beyond their capacity, which leads to drug abuse and health issues. That's why you sometimes see porn videos being 2 hours and longer. And I don't need to explain that this line of work leads to poverty, drug abuse, violence against women and sexually transmitted diseases.

 

[CrimsonReaper]

LMAOOOOO fuk off *******



I didnt know rapist was a profession but okay

you're saying we should respect someone who could work anything else other than selling their body for a living ROFLMAO. It's not a respectable job are you kidding me.

 

[CrimsonReaper]

do you tell your parents you watch porn? why is porn for adults and watched in private if it's that respectable this is just stupid.