^yea
You must be registered for see links
the second himself said that "from the way they are tracking us, I'd say they are Kumogakure Master Bounty hunters". that sounds like a guess to me, he is basing it by the way they were tracking them.
Minato uses the same thing here as well.
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
You must be registered for see links
basically minato was the one who defeated them by himself, he just asked them to throw the kunais to the battle and watch him. for minato, that wasn't meant for distraction, it was so that he can teleport near the kunais and kill them.
I know that about madara but did madara had the teleportation power and the power to make things go through him when he was at his prime or younger?
I have proven that he doesn't, it's your problem if you don't believe me.
You make the second hokage look great then why wasn't he able to defeat 20 people. He also had six fine shinobis by his side.
for me, all you do is use other people comments and correct them when you yourself can not bring a single evidence. All you do is make assumptions.
You assume that those bounty hunters were the greatest
you assume that minato made those ninjas use those kunais for distraction
you assume what people had say of the third is correct. Would the third had been able to get the same result as the fourth hokage, if he had fought madara?
you call this correction of mistakes. Correcting assumption with another assumption is not really correcting.
Those were real-life examples from another post, and another thread entirely. You might have found those, but I was asking you to find those same examples in my previous post, not in all of them. Besides, sometimes, if you put things in different words like that, it helps the person see what you're trying to say, so it's not bad all the time.
While Tobirama might have been estimating initially as to who their opponents exactly were, he is proved right due to his death shortly after. Besides, if Tobirama was just "guessing," as you said, why would he automatically jump to the worst conclusion and tell his squad they were master bounty hunters, instead of just ninja, putting fear in all their hearts? And since Minato uses the same ability Tobirama does, are you sure he is not guessing as well? Both are giving their squad members a general estimate of what they are facing, and they are proved right every time they use it.
And as for the kunai, they serve two purposes. Since the other ninja do throw kunai at the Iwagakure ninja, it could distract them from what they are trying to do, because anyone who sees such a weapon coming their way is going to divert their gaze to deal with the lethal object heading towards them. But you are right, it is meant for Minato to transport himself to the enemy's location. However, considering the objects being thrown are kunai, would they not distract the Iwagakure ninja from their plans? To me it seems that way.
There is not much to go off of as to whether Madara had his space-time ninjutsu in his prime, or younger, but once again, nothing in the manga suggests that he didn't. If you would, have a look at this:
You must be registered for see links
. Fu said that Madara "has to become solid again to attack," so during his fight with Hashirama, he was most likely stabbed while solid, and that was the point of his defeat. For all we know, Madara's space-time ninjutsu could be a result of Madara's Mangekyou Sharingan being awakened, though there is no evidence of this. I really don't see how you have proved Madara did not have his ability then. All you say is "stabbed = current power wouldn't let this happen;" when Madara sent Torune to the alternate dimension that has yet to be elaborated upon, his right arm got infected (because of Torune's poisonous bugs), and that was because he was solid - does this,
You must be registered for see links
not prove what I have said? Something of the same nature most likely happened while Madara was battling Hashirama; Madara's body was solid long enough for Hashirama to attack and defeat him.
The Second Hokage was indeed a powerful ninja, but he recognized when he was outmatched, and thus decided to be the decoy, because even though he did have six capable ninja by his side, all of them together still would not be able to go up against the Kumogakure master bounty hunters. Tell me, what is better, losing one life, or seven? If you will,
You must be registered for see links
. Even plans of taking the bounty hunters by surprise were put down by Sarutobi because they wouldn't work. And still you say they could have defeated all twenty of them. They weren't even attempting to fight them - they just wanted an escape route, which they got, albeit the death of Tobirama. Everyone is making assumptions, but the question is: can one make them by presenting evidence as it is, or distort it simply to fit one's argument, as you have done by seemingly "proving" to me that Madara did not have his space-time ninjutsu in his prime?
According to Iruka, Sarutobi was the strongest Hokage Konoha ever had (my original hypothesis that Hashirama was the strongest might be wrong), so in my opinion Sarutobi would have been able to put up a fight against Madara. What most people say about others turns out to be correct, because for most, judging between accurate and false information tends to be difficult. And for what reason would information about the Third, for example, be incorrect? The ones who speak about him are people that have known for a good amount of time, so they would have correct knowledge about his skills and abilities, for example Iruka. Correcting others' mistakes might be just as good as providing evidence, because through correction, evidence appears when the statements are made true. Sometimes evidence might not be the most powerful thing in an argument - being able to find mistakes in one's words might just be all the more powerful.