Debate: Simbv(SRA Neji) VS Curse Mark (Sakon/Ukon)

Simbv

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 15, 2014
Messages
2,873
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
This looks promising. Considering how I think this is a bad match up for Sakon, I wonder how this will go.
Still ain't find any judges yet? Interested to see this since neji literally stomps him low/med diff lol.

I was trying to explain this to the man in another thread, but he wanted a friendly debate so let it be done.
 

Curse Mark

Active member
Elite
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
7,750
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
This looks promising. Considering how I think this is a bad match up for Sakon, I wonder how this will go.
I'm really interested to see how this will turn out, and what Curse can do with Sakon/Ukon.


Either of you interested in judging?

So long as you could leave any bias outside your judgement and judge solely on arguments countered/ uncountered?
 

Curse Mark

Active member
Elite
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
7,750
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
As long as its not wall of text, I dont mind.
Just a friendly debate. We can keep it short and sweet.


I was trying to explain this to the man in another thread, but he wanted a friendly debate so let it be done.
I'm assuming that since this is a debate, we're arguing for them out of character, right?
 

Curse Mark

Active member
Elite
Joined
Nov 24, 2012
Messages
7,750
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
What do you mean out of character>?
In character VS Out of character.

It's a matchup stipulation like distance or anything like that.

Like if it was Naruto VS Sasuke at their first VOTE fight and they were out of character Naruto would feel no emotions towards Sasuke, no qualms about killing him, etc.

Essentially we'd be debating what techniques they could use instead of whether or not they're likely to do this or that.

Like it would be out of character for Itachi to use Amaterasu on someone straight from the first second.

It makes debates more interesting out of character because we don't have to argue like "Oh well Neji isn't like that he would never rush in and do that"
We just argue what we say they'll do.

That was a little long-winded, but does that make sense?
 

Simbv

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 15, 2014
Messages
2,873
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
In character VS Out of character.

It's a matchup stipulation like distance or anything like that.

Like if it was Naruto VS Sasuke at their first VOTE fight and they were out of character Naruto would feel no emotions towards Sasuke, no qualms about killing him, etc.

Essentially we'd be debating what techniques they could use instead of whether or not they're likely to do this or that.

Like it would be out of character for Itachi to use Amaterasu on someone straight from the first second.

It makes debates more interesting out of character because we don't have to argue like "Oh well Neji isn't like that he would never rush in and do that"
We just argue what we say they'll do.

That was a little long-winded, but does that make sense?
It makes sense, it really doesn't matter to me.
 
Top