Trump won't denounce KKK support.....

[Lelouch Le Brittania]

One of the things I have come to firmly believe the older I get is that minority activist groups and organizations are not all the same.

Black activists and organizations, for example, tend be the most consistent of all (still not very much in an absolute sense).

On the other hand, if there is a single entity out there today that literally embodies hypocrisy, it is the ADL.

Aside from monitoring thoughtcrime to the extent that even relatively small fry pro-Palestinian individuals become part of their hit-list, the ADL habitually engages in apologetics for Israeli butchery of its Arab enemies.

Now I personally care no more for the Israel-Palestine issue than I do most other ethnic conflicts out there.

And I am also a fan of the Ashkenazi Jewish people.

What really grinds my gears, however, is the sheerness of the proclivity that a not so insignificant number of them have for double-standards.

Does the ADL seriously think that Trump's America would be more of a "hate-fuelled xenophobic nation" than the ethno-state of Israel?

And when will they, by which I especially point to the Jewish Neocons and interventionists always clamouring for more wars in the Middle East they themselves have no intention of fighting despite a few of them having no trouble with, or having their sons to, volunteering to fight for the Israeli defence forces, stop asking us to fight wars that mostly 'White trash' fight and die in, but which always coincidentally serves Israel's regional interests?

I'm really tempted to agree with Ramzpaul here.

[video=youtube;Fbt2KgHIHvI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbt2KgHIHvI[/video]

I couldn't have agreed more.

 

[BlacLord™]

Well he is the guy who said he didn't have an easy life and got a small loan of a million dollar in the same sentence.

I can just see him now, sprawled on a chaise longue, hand on head saying "Oh why me God! To be born into a millionaire family and to suffer the hardships of drowning in money my whole life... ohhhhh the strain of those heavy dollar bills"

 

[Lightbringer]

One of the things I have come to firmly believe the older I get is that minority activist groups and organizations are not all the same.

Black activists and organizations, for example, tend be the most consistent of all (still not very much in an absolute sense).

On the other hand, if there is a single entity out there today that literally embodies hypocrisy, it is the ADL.

Aside from monitoring thoughtcrime to the extent that even relatively small fry pro-Palestinian individuals become part of their hit-list, the ADL habitually engages in apologetics for Israeli butchery of its Arab enemies.

Now I personally care no more for the Israel-Palestine issue than I do most other ethnic conflicts out there.

And I am also a fan of the Ashkenazi Jewish people.

What really grinds my gears, however, is the sheerness of the proclivity that a not so insignificant number of them have for double-standards.

Does the ADL seriously think that Trump's America would be more of a "hate-fuelled xenophobic nation" than the ethno-state of Israel?

And when will they, by which I especially point to the Jewish Neocons and interventionists always clamouring for more wars in the Middle East they themselves have no intention of fighting despite a few of them having no trouble with, or having their sons to, volunteering to fight for the Israeli defence forces, stop asking us to fight wars that mostly 'White trash' fight and die in, but which always coincidentally serves Israel's regional interests?

I'm really tempted to agree with Ramzpaul here.

[video=youtube;Fbt2KgHIHvI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fbt2KgHIHvI[/video]

Blaming the jews.....really?

The video is widely biased and tries to victimize white people because it is looked down upon to make an organization based on supremacy. There was another video where Confederates Trump Supporters were trying to victimize themselves in saying the Federal Government took the rights of the Confederates away.......but holding slaves isn't a right.

White people aren't a minority. Blacks, Mexicans, gays, etc are all targeted for a specific reason such as skin color or sexual orientation. That is why it's called a hate crime.

When one race oppresses another or portrays themselves as a superior, then there is racial tension and civil conflict. America has a pretty bad track-record of this.

Bernie Sanders has denounced supporters that spew sexist slogans against Hillary, but Trump can't denounce the KKK? It's very amusing to suggest that Trump is in the right here.

 

[Narushima]

Blaming the jews.....really?

The video is widely biased and tries to victimize white people because it is looked down upon to make an organization based on supremacy. There was another video where Confederates Trump Supporters were trying to victimize themselves in saying the Federal Government took the rights of the Confederates away.......but holding slaves isn't a right.

Lightbringer this is why I am reluctant to engage in debates with liberals these days, all I get from you lot is the same old repertoire of buzzwords, platitudes and cultural-Marxism.

The ADL broached this whole issue so the Jews are relevant to the discussion for the same reason you think the partiality of the man in that video is pertinent.

White people aren't a minority. Blacks, Mexicans, gays, etc are all targeted for a specific reason such as skin color or sexual orientation. That is why it's called a hate crime.

Sigh do you guys even read what you type? Being "targeted for a specific reason such as skin colour" is hate-crime but Whites are incapable of being victimized in virtue of being a [fading] majority? The Russian people were the victims of the kingdom of socialism (the USSR), especially in its early days, being a majority did not preclude that.

When one race oppresses another or portrays themselves as a superior, then there is racial tension and civil conflict. America has a pretty bad track-record of this.

Incorrect; tribal-based conflict is one of the great themes of history. Here is a 2015 scientific paper, and hardly the only one with its tenor, on the ultimate cause of ethnic conflicts by three authors (Cemal Arbatli, Quamrul Ashraf and Oded Galor): one who is an ethnic Turk, the other a Bangladeshi and the third an Israeli Jew - I mention that because you are so concerned about partiality and its relation to the backgrounds of people.

The paper, the full version of which can be downloaded from the Brown University website, is titled "The Nature of Conflict," here is its abstract:

"This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict. These findings arguably reflect the contribution of genetic diversity to the degree of fractionalization and polarization across ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in the national population; the adverse influence of genetic diversity on interpersonal trust and cooperation; the contribution of genetic diversity to divergence in preferences for public goods and redistributive policies; and the potential impact of genetic diversity on economic inequality within a society."

Bernie Sanders has denounced supporters that spew sexist slogans against Hillary, but Trump can't denounce the KKK? It's very amusing to suggest that Trump is in the right here.

I will give you a more detailed reply when you give me something original instead of the rehashed leftism that I could write a computer program to automate.

 

[Power Bottom]

He's a dumbass lol

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Lightbringer this is why I am reluctant to engage in debates with liberals these days, all I get from you lot is the same old repertoire of buzzwords, platitudes and cultural-Marxism.

The ADL broached this whole issue so the Jews are relevant to the discussion for the same reason you think the partiality of the man in that video is pertinent.



Sigh do you guys even read what you type? Being "targeted for a specific reason such as skin colour" is hate-crime but Whites are incapable of being victimized in virtue of being a [fading] majority? The Russian people were the victims of the kingdom of socialism (the USSR), especially in its early days, being a majority did not preclude that.





Incorrect; tribal-based conflict is one of the great themes of history. Here is a 2015 scientific paper, and hardly the only one with its tenor, on the ultimate cause of ethnic conflicts by three authors (Cemal Arbatli, Quamrul Ashraf and Oded Galor): one who is an ethnic Turk, the other a Bangladeshi and the third an Israeli Jew - I mention that because you are so concerned about partiality and its relation to the backgrounds of people.

The paper, the full version of which can be downloaded from the Brown University website, is titled "The Nature of Conflict," here is its abstract:

"This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict. These findings arguably reflect the contribution of genetic diversity to the degree of fractionalization and polarization across ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in the national population; the adverse influence of genetic diversity on interpersonal trust and cooperation; the contribution of genetic diversity to divergence in preferences for public goods and redistributive policies; and the potential impact of genetic diversity on economic inequality within a society."





I will give you a more detailed reply when you give me something original instead of the rehashed leftism that I could write a computer program to automate.

So why shouldn't Trump denounce KKK? Also, who are you voting for (a bit off topic, but I'd like to know)?

 

[MAN OF SIN]

Guy sounds ignorant as balls in that interview.

 

[Lightbringer]

Lightbringer this is why I am reluctant to engage in debates with liberals these days, all I get from you lot is the same old repertoire of buzzwords, platitudes and cultural-Marxism.

The ADL broached this whole issue so the Jews are relevant to the discussion for the same reason you think the partiality of the man in that video is pertinent.



Sigh do you guys even read what you type? Being "targeted for a specific reason such as skin colour" is hate-crime but Whites are incapable of being victimized in virtue of being a [fading] majority? The Russian people were the victims of the kingdom of socialism (the USSR), especially in its early days, being a majority did not preclude that.





Incorrect; tribal-based conflict is one of the great themes of history. Here is a 2015 scientific paper, and hardly the only one with its tenor, on the ultimate cause of ethnic conflicts by three authors (Cemal Arbatli, Quamrul Ashraf and Oded Galor): one who is an ethnic Turk, the other a Bangladeshi and the third an Israeli Jew - I mention that because you are so concerned about partiality and its relation to the backgrounds of people.

The paper, the full version of which can be downloaded from the Brown University website, is titled "The Nature of Conflict," here is its abstract:

"This research establishes that the emergence, prevalence, recurrence, and severity of intrastate conflicts in the modern era reflect the long shadow of prehistory. Exploiting variations across national populations, it demonstrates that genetic diversity, as determined predominantly during the exodus of humans from Africa tens of thousands of years ago, has contributed significantly to the frequency, incidence, and onset of both overall and ethnic civil conflict over the last half-century, accounting for a large set of geographical and institutional correlates of conflict, as well as measures of economic development. Furthermore, the analysis establishes the significant contribution of genetic diversity to the intensity of social unrest and to the incidence of intragroup factional conflict. These findings arguably reflect the contribution of genetic diversity to the degree of fractionalization and polarization across ethnic, linguistic, and religious groups in the national population; the adverse influence of genetic diversity on interpersonal trust and cooperation; the contribution of genetic diversity to divergence in preferences for public goods and redistributive policies; and the potential impact of genetic diversity on economic inequality within a society."





I will give you a more detailed reply when you give me something original instead of the rehashed leftism that I could write a computer program to automate.

What the hell are you talking about.......?

 

[Dark Sonic]

I'm really considering on moving out of America if this clown wins.

 

[paratise]

What the hell are you talking about.......?

It is usual method of Aim69C or whatever; typing too much, going off tangent, tokenizing and eventually make people say this & give up:

You must be registered for see images

OT: Wasn't his father a member of KKK?

You must be registered for see links

 

[Dark Sonic]

It is usual method of Aim69C or whatever; typing too much, going off tangent, tokenizing and eventually make people say this & give up:

You must be registered for see images

OT: Wasn't his father a member of KKK?

You must be registered for see links

His father is an orangutan. ;D

 

[Narushima]

So why shouldn't Trump denounce KKK? Also, who are you voting for (a bit off topic, but I'd like to know)?

Here is an interesting piece of information that many of you may not have known - Trump's daughter Ivanka is not only married to a practicing Jew but has herself converted to Judaism; given that revelation, what are the odds that he sympathizes with the KKK or David Duke?

David Duke, a former grand-wizard of the KKK if you didn't know, is the guy who's built his entire public reputation on his enmity with Jews.

That Trump's daughter is Jewish by religion and that two of his grandchildren are half Jewish by ethnicity is, in and of itself, 'disavowal' enough of the likes of the KKK and David Duke.

Politics, American politics even moreso, is like literature - you have to read between the lines.

Let me show you guys the real meaning behind all of this.

From the Neocon National Review article titled "It's Time for an Anti-Trump Manhattan Project":

"If the Trump contingent should succeed in this endeavor, the party would not emerge refreshed or improved; it would be summarily returned to where it was languishing back in early 2009. And if that should happen? Well, suffice it to say that it would be an unmitigated, unalloyed, potentially unsalvageable disaster.
…
If I sound frightened or eschatological in my tone, that’s because I am
…
Now is the time to throw everything at Trump, and to stop this disaster in its tracks. Will our children wonder why we were so reluctant?

Incidentally, when I say “everything,” I really do mean everything.

Tomorrow night, as they stand on either side of Trump, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz must find their resolve and all-but-machine-gun the man to the floor."

What do you think they intend with "all-but machine-gun the man to the floor"?

The truth, Pumpkin Ninja, is that all of this is a facade for the establishment media knows very well that Trump has nothing to do with David Duke, and this little guilt-by-association tactic (oh look Trump doesn't kiss arse and bend over backwards to every little demand made of him therefore he must be Hitler reincarnate) is just ammunition in their agitprop campaign that they conduct against virtually any populist politician (this sort of stuff happens routinely against Nigel Farage in my country).

To answer your request on my personal politics - I am British, and will be voting to put an end to the neo Soviet Union known as the European Union in the coming referendum as well as the UKIP in the next election.