What if science worked like religion?

[ComplexCity]

No, you do not know what I meant or else you would not sig it as if it was a hateful remark. And, really? ''You have been disproven because as I stated'' implying you are qualified enough to decide wether or not my explanation of universal morality is solid.

Yes because calling black people cancer is a wonderful thing to generalize.

Your silly notion that morality is universal objective is disproved by Isis

 

[ComplexCity]

What's not stalkerish about keeping track of a female member's activity who already got done with your obsessiveness a year ago?

So much for the peacemaker, why is this post even necessary?

 

[Punk Hazard]

no evidence =no proof

End of discussion on that -_-

Proof and evidence are synonymous. So of course no evidence=no proof.

 

[Scooby Doo]

no evidence =no proof

End of discussion on that -_-

Not at all. You redefining the words and claiming 'end of discussion' is not an argument.
While it's true that if you have no evidence, you can't have proof (as proof is a sufficient amount of evidence), but just because you don't have enough evidence to prove something, it doesn't mean you didn't have evidence at all.

 

[Scooby Doo]

Proof and evidence are synonymous. So of course no evidence=no proof.

They're not. Where do you get that from?

 

[Punk Hazard]

They're not. Where do you get that from?

proof
pro͞of/Submit
noun
1.
evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.

 

[YowYan]

Yes because calling black people cancer is a wonderful thing to generalize.

Your silly notion that morality is universal objective is disproved by Isis

Context, City. Context. Read Rikerslade's lesson and think. comprehend. realize. christ..

So much for the peacemaker, why is this post even necessary?

My post was as necessary as his.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Yes because calling black people cancer is a wonderful thing to generalize.

Your silly notion that morality is universal objective is disproved by Isis

He said that there are many black people who are a cancer to society. That isn't the same thing as saying ALL black people are a cancer. Or that being black makes you a cancer.

I showed you the stats showing that there's an estimated number of black gangmembers that exceed 300,000. Is that not a lot?

 

[ComplexCity]

No, I know that but you make a lot of threads about Trannies, gays, etc.

The last thread I made about transsexuals was something I read in an article and even then the OP had no hate in it just something I disagreed with. It wasn't until Riker responded that it got heated. This guy makes continuous threads trying to make religion look bad. It's not an opinionated thread it's purely a bashing one. Albeit I was immature in some of my threads in the past, they were never meant to bash but discuss opinions, something as you saw clearly not being done in Hawkers threads

Was I talking about homosexuality though?

In reference to my comment, I make threads about them so you didn't have too.

 

[Scooby Doo]

proof
pro͞of/Submit
noun
1.
evidence or argument establishing or helping to establish a fact or the truth of a statement.

Yes, if evidence establishes a fact or a statement to be true, that means you've got proof. How does that make them synonimous?

A proof is sufficient evidence or an argument for the truth of a proposition.

You must be registered for see links

 

[ComplexCity]

He said that there are many black people who are a cancer to society. That isn't the same thing as saying ALL black people are a cancer. Or that being black makes you a cancer.

I showed you the stats showing that there's an estimated number of black gangmembers that exceed 300,000. Is that not a lot?

I've already responded to you in the other thread. I'm not bringing this here, if you want discuss that go back to the other thread

Context, City. Context. Read Rikerslade's lesson and think. comprehend. realize. christ..



My post was as necessary as his.

Read above

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

He said that there are many black people who are a cancer to society. That isn't the same thing as saying ALL black people are a cancer. Or that being black makes you a cancer.

I showed you the stats showing that there's an estimated number of black gangmembers that exceed 300,000. Is that not a lot?

I get what you're saying but saying many blacks are a cancer sort of suggests that it's only a black people problem.

 

[Hawker]

You telling me I'm just insecure, is ad hominem.

You saying that I'm just jerking on semantics, is not an argument. I'm not the one remaking threads and spend dozens of hours debating then rebuke others for posting 'walls of text'-another word meaning of which you failed to understand. Didn't I tell you to come back when you have memorized the meaning of teh words? Posting 5-6 lines is not a wall of text, not any less than your essay was on how faith is evil. A wall of text doesn't use paragraphs and proper grammar- I do.

And again, instead of bishing around, you could be grateful that someone tries to tell you about semantics and mistakes so that later you can make better arguments if you so insist on remaking these threads. My only point was that you used those words incorrectly -everything else was shifting the topic. And evidence is still evidence, even if it's weak as per you. In any case, I'm still waiting for you to tell Yow that his spiritual beliefs are also evil, a concept that according to RD whose videos you like so much: doesn't exist.

Underlinded No it's not because it's true and it affects severely to what you say.

Difference between you and me is that you write almost all of your posts like they were chapters for a freaking book. You just spew stuff here and there without no ability compress it. I only do it when I actually have something to say.

You arguing about semantics didn't get you anywhere. It's debatable if world is an evidence for god. It may be a weak evidence at best, but why did you write all those walls of texts when in the end you just have a lemon for a lemon god? It didn't change the outcome.


Bold: I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. -Richard Dawkins

 

[DominiqueX]

Arai
Simple. There is no reason to tolerate intolerance.
That's why my posts regarding you are written the way they are.

 

[Punk Hazard]

I get what you're saying but saying many blacks are a cancer sort of suggests that it's only a black people problem.

Many fruits are soft. Does that sound like saying only fruits are soft?

I've already responded to you in the other thread. I'm not bringing this here, if you want discuss that go back to the other thread



Read above

What? You brought it the topic from another thread to attack someone with, and when he defends himself, you're saying you don't wanna talk about it in this thread? Why did you bring it up in the first place then? Why are you so dumb

 

[KingForever7]

Not at all. You redefining the words and claiming 'end of discussion' is not an argument.
While it's true that if you have no evidence, you can't have proof (as proof is a sufficient amount of evidence), but just because you don't have enough evidence to prove something, it doesn't mean you didn't have evidence at all.

Basically, the "Black hole" argument I had with complex a few pages ago.
While there's physical evidence to show potential gravitational effects of black holes....It's not the same as evidence to show that Black holes DO exist therefore not enough to prove that Black holes exist.

However, there's enough proof to make the theory of Black holes....and If more evidence leads to something different, scientists will create a new better theory for Black holes.

Nevertheless, compared to God where there is no physical evidence thus no proof.

 

[Scooby Doo]

Underlinded No it's not because it's true

It isn't just because you say so.

Difference between you and me is that you write almost all of your posts like they were chapters for a freaking book. You just spew stuff here and there without no ability compress it. I only do it when I actually have something to say.

Interesting because I don't always post long essays either, just when I feel it's necessary. It takes only a few definitions to link to show that your thread was based on a semantic fallacy. Swallow it.

You arguing about semantics didn't get you anywhere. It's debatable if world is an evidence for god. It may be a weak evidence at best, but why did you write all those walls of texts when in the end you just have a lemon for a lemon god? It didn't change the outcome.

See, you admit it's weak evidence. Other than that, the point I was making in the thread was about your semantic fallacy, the existence of God is a different issue, especially considering that not even all religions believe in God.

Bold: I think a case can be made that faith is one of the world's great evils, comparable to the smallpox virus but harder to eradicate. -Richard Dawkins

So he contradicts himself whenever it fits him? Inconsistency much.

 

[Scooby Doo]

Basically, the "Black hole" argument I had with complex a few pages ago.
While there's physical evidence to show potential gravitational effects of black holes....It's not the same as evidence to show that Black holes DO exist therefore not enough to prove that Black holes exist.

However, there's enough proof to make the theory of Black holes....and If more evidence leads to something different, scientists will create a new better theory for Black holes.

Nevertheless, compared to God where there is no physical evidence thus no proof.

Physical evidence? You do know that inference is based on the existence of the physical universe, right? Again, even if you'd show it to be a non sequitur, it'd still be evidence. Just like my DNA example in rape cases in court.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Many fruits are soft. Does that sound like saying only fruits are soft?


What? You brought it the topic from another thread to attack someone with, and when he defends himself, you're saying you don't wanna talk about it in this thread? Why did you bring it up in the first place then? Why are you so dumb

Damn you and your amazing analogies! Nah, people have a different mentality and interpretation when it comes to race though. I've only really seen YowYan address non-whites with derogatory terms when they commit crimes (Which is strange because I know he's not white). Even if he means those specific people, those derogatory terms will be used more generally by other people. It's how it always works.

 

[Punk Hazard]

There's an estimated number 1.1 million gang members in America, 31% of which are black, which is an approximate 356500 black gang members. They are a cancer to society, and that's relatively a lot of people. So, it's not incorrect to say that many black people are a cancer to society. It's not like he said being black makes you a cancer to society, or that all or most black people are a cancer to society.

You never addressed this Complex