Murder isn't always the solution, especially when you're God and have all the powers of the universe.
God may be limitless.
People, however, are a bit less flexible.
But you fantasize about being the architect of a religious genocide so maybe brutish thug solutions are just a natural thing with you.
Your tongue can get you into trouble when speaking to dragons.
Termites.
How do you deal with them... and why is it so important to deal with them?
Termites do what they do, and there is no way to render a termite into anything other than a termite. If you wish to keep your home - you are force to make a decision with a cost that is not negotiable.
It was already established that for God to have a plan for humanity, they are already deprived of that free will as they are simply flying down a track of inevitability.
I have a plan for how my books are going to end. The middle is an ever changing sand where the characters actually behave in ways that were not planned. Yet, the end is very much planned.
If, even within the limited constraints of my mind, characters have an aspect of freedom from a conceived fate - then why is it so difficult to believe that a plan for humanity equates to an elimination of free will - especially since that end is planned around who their characters are?
Also how is it depriving people of free will? They chose to go against what I taught them in my holy books and sermons(Yeah, I actually make contact with my slav- followers), thus they face consequences. The same way God did it in Sodom and Gomorrah. However, his punishments are way harsher than mine.
So, when someone makes the decision to enter into a cult, believes in raping people, etc ... and you suddenly decide to undo that decision for them and make them adopt other convictions and choices... that's NOT a violation of free will?
If all of a person's free actions are negated by the passing of your judgment and they will never experience anything other than perfectly lawful and peaceful behavior... then why are they even alive in the first place? None of their decisions matter. They don't even understand when they have broken a law as any decision that would result in breaking the law is reversed and changed....
May as well just kill them, as their life as anything other than a puppet is gone.
His ideology is follow my rule or rot in hell.
My ideology is follow my rule or be put on the right path.
Be careful repeating what forked tongues tell you.
You are repeating what we call: "dogma." Institutions of man have long used the threat of eternal suffering for breaking certain rules. The problem is finding these things in the Bible - and good luck finding where God is directly saying some of these things.
Further, Jesus spoke of two different 'hells.' Or, rather, when speaking of the Pharisee, he spoke of "absolute damnation" - because they were corrupting the teachings and laws to enrich themselves. This is opposed to a 'hell' that is a sort of state of suffering (which is often within the context of someone doing foolish things and suffering the consequences of being a fool, or of regretting actions taken) - which is not meant to be an eternal state, but still one that most would want to avoid.
Further - you are not putting people on the right path. You are simply creating things that you direct as you desire. They have no free will as you simply correct anything they do that you don't like. Honestly - sounds like you've built a micromanagement hell for yourself where the people are simply expressions of your own ego.
So when a pedophile rapes and murders a baby, God doesn't stop it because he values the free will of that raping, murdering pedophile over the baby's safety?
Isn't that person making the decision to rape and murder a baby? The person is far more intricate than simply the act of raping and murdering. Just as you are. Sexual impulses exist within you - and you are constantly trying to put those impulses into context within the world around you. Some people fail... and others do make the decision to embrace intolerable expressions of that impulse.
The point is that you make mistakes, as well. You break rules you set for yourself, even.
Free will as a concept is free will. You don't get to go in and micro-manage thought processes to exclude certain freedoms of thought and will without setting off a cascade of other problems that ends up imploding the concept of free will. People can choose to do horrible things, and direct intervention every time everyone turns around is just a bad idea.
Even Futurama got that right.
Are you comparing real life God to villains in a fictional universe about space travel.
I'm saying that your description of how God would act is virtually identical to the concept of The Borg - a villainous race of forced-cybernetic drone-slaves that conformed everyone to the same goal/purpose. This was, also, against the backdrop of the good guys striving for galactic peace and harmony between feuding races. That the progressive authors of the series recognized the Borg as villains despite the fact that the Borg accomplish the stated goal of the good guys should speak to the depth of which your idea is flawed.