Not even if Zou arc Luffy is >> Dressrosa arc Luffy? Exactly your just proving my point, we got too many dickriders in the OP community.
When will people decide Luffy has surpassed people like Doflamingo? When will people decide Luffy has surpassed Sabo? When will people decide Luffy surpassed Marco?
When they want him to? I'm suppose to ignore whatever Luffy does next arc or who he fights just because people like you feel he shouldn't surpass this person until 2000 arcs from now? I'm getting tired of people putting Top tier level on some big ass pedestal no one can reach except this or that person.
What's wrong with Weeble being stronger than Doflamingo?
U act as if luffy defeated doffy with gear 4th alone... He had to use it twice as well as gamma knife being used on doffy if it takes that much damage to defeat weeble and then some then yes he would b stronger then doffy... It was obvious with doffy that he was shown in beginning of the new world to show that luffy needs allies to even contend with the big guys (mind u doffy is not a big guy)
The fact that u said if luffy solos weeble because he's introduced after doffy to me is invalid..(well if he does) my opinion it would prove that he isn't stronger then doffy because it took to much to defeat him some of which luffy can't even produce that type of damage.. unless by by zou arc luffy can produce a bigger time limit than gear 4th for a straight 50 minutes (it was 2 gear 4ths together someone calculated it I think it was riker) and then A little more I don't understand why he would b stronger then doffy.
Luffy can only sustain gear 4th for about 20 min and then he's done if he beats weeble in that time limit it would prove that he would b inferior to doffy.. As it took luffy a gear 4th a total of 50 minutes to defeat him.. (And gamma knife)
So yeah if weeble lasts longer then the 20 minutes of gear fourth (he should cuz he looks like a tank like his dad ) then he would just defeat luffy then and there because luffy would not be able to defend himself... Do u understand what I am saying? (Feels like I'm talking in circles my bad lol)
There's also the damage factor
If luffy by zao arc can put down weeble with more damage than 2 gear 4ths one gamma knife and one Kong punch and one King Kong punch (broke country) in the 20 minute time limit (going with what we know about gear 4th) then yes he would be stronger then doffy as it took more damage to take him out...
Ppl also downplay what power gamma knife has ... Sure it's not as flashy as gear 4th but it packs if not as much power even more then what luffy dished out as it is literally a one hit ko if landed .. Doffy only managed because of his fruit ability.. Which DOESNOT I REPEAT DOESNOT (for some ppl who believes this) heal him it only keeps his organs intact.. The fact that he survived that along with many gear 4th attacks to the stomach and all over his body proves how much it took to put him down
As for ur bull about weeble being ugly or what ever ivankov is my 5th favorite character... And I think he's strong af despite how he's portrayed/looks .. So looks have nothing to do with it...
U also act as if once a char gets defeated they can't come bag stronger (regardless of training or not..) croc is prime example of this he lost against luffy pre gears but at war luffy stops him with gear attack and he gets up like its nothing...
U also have to factor in that doffy was literally the string that kept a lot of big wigs in check .. U act as if he'd just some villian he's obviously important to the story or oda wouldn't show him so much and explain what he does after his defeat etc .. Look at all luffys other opponents none have seemed to be as important to the story as doffy does and also it seems doffy is about to be saved now is he being saved to be killed idk but w.e that's my points on why I wouldn't just place weeble ahead of anyone especially doffy or even Hancock without any manga evidence besides hype to back it up...