Naruto is going to die

[Yata Mirror]

Lord Hokage will have his clones fight the Otsusuki fodders while he has some fun with the Byakugan princess

 

[KesOnFire]

Indeed I see

 

[KesOnFire]

Naruto already died once. He'll die again, no big deal.

Hey can you post scan of Naruto dead?

 

[The Demon Hawk]

Hey can you post scan of Naruto dead?

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

 

[KesOnFire]

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

ummm bro you are wrong he isn't dead there try again and sasuke isn't dead either if you didn't know that
Don't you read the words? AT THIS RATE NARUTO WILL DIE/Sakura/Obito saved him.

Try again/reread manga

 

[ultraChalk]

Funny that mods will let a thread like this stay up.

 

[The Demon Hawk]

ummm bro you are wrong he isn't dead there try again and sasuke isn't dead either if you didn't know that
Don't you read the words? AT THIS RATE NARUTO WILL DIE/Sakura/Obito saved him.

Try again/reread manga

Re-read the caption, bro. "Their heartbeats stop, their wills burn out". You try again.

 

[Aampt]

Funny that mods will let a thread like this stay up.

Dw I'm surprised too

 

[Obito the supreme jin]

Yes most likely.

 

[KesOnFire]

Re-read the caption, bro. "Their heartbeats stop, their wills burn out". You try again.

Seriously? Go watch Sakura save his life before he does/reread manga

Heart still beating try again

 

[The Demon Hawk]

Seriously? Go watch Sakura save his life before he does/reread manga

Heart still beating try again

He was dead. For you, I think I'll have to change the wordings, "almost dead". How's that? Sakura was just resisting that last bit. If you call that being alive, then you're crazy. He was technically dead. And BTW, my point was never Naruto actually dying or not. My point was that the whole Naruto dying in the movie is complete crap. Because it's just as vague as his death in Part 2. He'll be alive again, doesn't matter if he dies or not.

 

[KesOnFire]

He was dead. For you, I think I'll have to change the wordings, "almost dead". How's that? Sakura was just resisting that last bit. If you call that being alive, then you're crazy. He was technically dead. And BTW, my point was never Naruto actually dying or not. My point was that the whole Naruto dying in the movie is complete crap. Because it's just as vague as his death in Part 2. He'll be alive again, doesn't matter if he dies or not.

He was dead. For you, I think I'll have to change the wordings, "almost dead". How's that? Sakura was just resisting that last bit.

^^^Stopped reading atfer that. I don't think Sakura has the power to revive people so , so I don't think Naruto ''DIED''

You are crazy trolling right now XD

 

[The Demon Hawk]

He was dead. For you, I think I'll have to change the wordings, "almost dead". How's that? Sakura was just resisting that last bit.

^^^Stopped reading atfer that. I don't think Sakura has the power to revive people so , so I don't think Naruto ''DIED''

You are crazy trolling right now XD

Who said anything about "reviving" people? Where do you keep your brain when you're reading posts? Your comprehension is really bad. Sakura was pumping his heart to continue the blood flow, that's resisting that last bit. Naruto was technically dead...

 

[KesOnFire]

Who said anything about "reviving" people? Where do you keep your brain when you're reading posts? Your comprehension is really bad. Sakura was pumping his heart to continue the blood flow, that's resisting that last bit. Naruto was technically dead...

Are you dumb? You said Naruto died... If he died he obviously got revived right? Go up your reading comprehension skills before you come at me uttering nosense.

 

[The Demon Hawk]

Are you dumb? You said Naruto died... If he died he obviously got revived right? Go up your reading comprehension skills before you come at me uttering nosense.

He "technically" died, not "literally". "Technically" implies that he was just like a dead person therefore, he's considered dead. I already tried to explain it and even rephrased it for you by saying "almost dead" and you still didn't understand. How poor... And he would've literally died if Sage didn't give him half of his chakra. He was around dead by that time, was just on the edge, when the Sage saved him from dying, at the very crucial moment.

 

[KesOnFire]

He "technically" died, not "literally". "Technically" implies that he was just like a dead person therefore, he's considered dead. I already tried to explain it and even rephrased it for you by saying "almost dead" and you still didn't understand. How poor... And he would've literally died if Sage didn't give him half of his chakra. He was around dead by that time, was just on the edge, when the Sage saved him from dying, at the very crucial moment.

He "technically" died, not "literally".

^^Stopped reading atfer that. You said he died not technically died stop trolling buddy boy go sit down.

Naruto already died once. He'll die again, no big deal.

^^^Just to remind you what you said and what started this conversation...

 

[The Demon Hawk]

He "technically" died, not "literally".

^^Stopped reading atfer that. You said he died not technically died stop trolling buddy boy go sit down.



^^^Just to remind you what you said and what started this conversation...

What started this conversation has nothing to so with the entire argument. My initial post didn't and doesn't need to mention all the details and description, so considering my first post as a criterion of judgement of what I meant is your stupidity. I can't do anything about that. That post was to only convey the idea, further explanation and clarification can be done later on. No mature person mentions every single tiny unnecessary detail in a single post, because it's unneeded and irrelevant. And when you started arguing about it after failing to understand, I further explained it to clarify your perspective. So considering the whole argument instead of just the first post was the sensible thing to do, which unfortunately and embarrassingly enough, you didn't do.

Since your memory is really bad, let me remind you of the instances when I mentioned Naruto being "technically" and "almost" dead. See the below posts (underlined).

He was dead. For you, I think I'll have to change the wordings, "almost dead". How's that? Sakura was just resisting that last bit. If you call that being alive, then you're crazy. He was technically dead. And BTW, my point was never Naruto actually dying or not. My point was that the whole Naruto dying in the movie is complete crap. Because it's just as vague as his death in Part 2. He'll be alive again, doesn't matter if he dies or not.

Who said anything about "reviving" people? Where do you keep your brain when you're reading posts? Your comprehension is really bad. Sakura was pumping his heart to continue the blood flow, that's resisting that last bit. Naruto was technically dead...

There you go.

 

[KesOnFire]

What started this conversation has nothing to so with the entire argument.

Sorry bro I reply only to what I read. Anyways you said Naruto died , you can't post proof of it now you're trying to say ''technically''.

Whats going on?

You must be registered for see images

Did he die or not?

Naruto already died once. He'll die again, no big deal.

^^^Here is what you wrote once again. I am only talking to you cuz I want a answer to this post. Yet you keep uttering nonsense.

 

[The Demon Hawk]

Sorry bro I reply only to what I read. Anyways you said Naruto died , you can't post proof of it now you're trying to say ''technically''.

Whats going on?

You must be registered for see images

Did he die or not?



^^^Here is what you wrote once again. I am only talking to you cuz I want a answer to this post. Yet you keep uttering nonsense.

Let me give you an insight because you still don't understand. Referring to the movie, I said Naruto died already, so it doesn't matter if he dies again or not because he'll be alive again in the end either way. I didn't feel the need to describe the very type of death at that point since it was irrelevant (I was talking from the movie's perspective, not the explanation of his death, so mentioning that was unnecessary). But when you started questioning it, I explained it to you as I already gave you the reference of my posts. I elaborated on how I considered Naruto to be dead i.e. technically dead, not literally, just as I wrote in those posts which you completely neglected or failed to comprehend. I think you missed those and jumped back to the former post, that's why you mistook my words. And again, referring to my initial post (or any initial post for that matter) is a fallacious outlook and makes your argument invalid and unworthy of consideration. Why are you considering only my first post while neglecting every other post, when elaboration about it was made it later posts? I can't see anything but ignorance...

@bold That's a very lousy and defected approach of comprehension and argument. You need to change it. Just a friendly suggestion.

 

[KesOnFire]

Let me give you an insight because you still don't understand. Referring to the movie, I said Naruto died already, so it doesn't matter if he dies again or not because he'll be alive again in the end either way. I didn't feel the need to describe the very type of death at that point since it was irrelevant (I was talking from the movie's perspective, not the explanation of his death, so mentioning that was unnecessary). But when you started questioning it, I explained it to you as I already gave you the reference of my posts. I elaborated on how I considered Naruto to be dead i.e. technically dead, not literally, just as I wrote in those posts which you completely neglected or failed to comprehend. I think you missed those and jumped back to the former post, that's why you mistook my words. And again, referring to my initial post (or any initial post for that matter) is a fallacious outlook and makes your argument invalid and unworthy of consideration. Why are you considering only my first post while neglecting every other post, when elaboration about it was made it later posts? I can't see anything but ignorance...

@bold That's a very lousy and defected approach of comprehension and argument. You need to change it. Just a friendly suggestion.

''Referring to the movie, I said Naruto died already,''

^^^^Stopped reading atfer this.

That's not the way you replied to me , you were dropping scans trying to prove he died and you failed hard body
:|. GG buddy boy.