- Joined
- Aug 16, 2012
- Messages
- 1,341
- Reaction score
- 62
you want to know what the chief difference here is? I'm bringing up things that actually happened to prove my point. You're resorting to using hypothetical situations as a means of trying to prove a point. At the end of the day, it's all you got.
Actually it is the other way around because you aren't bringing up things that actually happened only assuming while I'm showing what the manga portrayed by keeping it the same and removing one aspect.
I'm subtracting from the manga, you are adding to it.
Because I said without Black Zetsu Madara would have lost.
You are implying that even without black zetsu he wouldn't have, which goes against what the Manga presented.
Is that a difficult concept for you to grasp.
Here is another way to look at it.
I'm saying that because of what happened in the manga, Madara escaped defeat due to assistance from black zetsu.
You are proposing that by negating that assistances would have the result in with madara still escaping defeat.
I'm only saying that the manga supports that Madara needed help. you on the other hand are using your imagination to say that, no the manga events don't matter because (insert assumption) thus the burden of proof is upon your shoulder bub.