"If we exhale more than we inhale we feed plants. this will end world hunger"
It's no secret that plants require carbon dioxide to go through photosynthesis and make their food, which they get from animals exhaling. Inhaling and exhaling are metaphors for the way both animals, specifically humans in this case, and plants benefit and give to each other. However, human beings have come to start taking, or inhaling, in excessive amounts; we are taking more than we need. This creates inbalances, particularly in distribution of wealth and resources, and also with the negative effects we have on the environment we are "inhaling" from. If we were to stop taking so much, and instead work on giving(exhaling), the environment would flourish because we are "feeding the plants." If we weren't so preoccupied by how much we have to take in for ourselves, how much we're "inhaling", there wouldn't be inbalances. There'd be more than enough resources and distribution of wealth that we wouldn't have things like world hunger because everyone would have enough, rather many have so much excess there isn't enough for everyone and they don't care that there isn't enough for everyone. Basically, humans are being selfish as shit.
"how can mirrors be real if our eyes are not"
We perceive things visually through our eyes. Our eyes not being real means our perception isn't real. This is my own personal interpretation, but it's a statement on false standards established by society. We live in a world where we constantly look at things through standards: Is she skinny enough? Is he tall enough? Is he muscular enough? Is her skin soft enough? We reduce ourselves to standards that don't matter and take away from our true worth. Someone beautiful can look in the mirror and think they're ugly because it doesn't fit what society says they should look like. We look in the mirror and see ourselves, and we perceive our own worth. However, can the worth and what we perceive in the mirror be genuine(how can be mirrors be real) if the standards we are using to perceive this worth aren't(if our eyes are not)?
"if newborns were able to speak they would be the most IQ beings on earth"
Syntax here is pretty ****ed up, but I'm pretty sure it's a statement on the ideology that as we grow, we are conditioned by education, the media and society as a whole. We are made to think in certain ways, look at things through certain viewpoints, that may not necessarily be correct or the best way. A newborn is free from this conditioning, it's untainted, it's raw. A newborn baby speaking is a metaphor for people being free from conditioning.
Just because you can't see the meaning doesn't mean the meaning isn't there.
