The Future?

FreakensteinAG

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,227
Reaction score
785
and at what point is too much when it comes to technology running our lives?

You know you have trust issues when you are suspicious of a goddang bed. :| Running our lives? Technological growth is almost always good.
 

SolarSpider

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
972
Reaction score
104
You know you have trust issues when you are suspicious of a goddang bed. :| Running our lives? Technological growth is almost always good.

We depend on technological products to the point, that most of us wouldn't be able to live without it. Why do we want to set our decentants up for failure. They don't know the basic things to survive. With current technology, you can't even go somewhere without activating your GPS so you are always being tracked. Don't get me started on social media etc... Big brother is always watching you!

Also, I decide when I wake up.. not my bed.
 

Pumpkin Ninja

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
15,554
Reaction score
1,857
You know you have trust issues when you are suspicious of a goddang bed. :| Running our lives? Technological growth is almost always good.
Until they decide to kill us in our sleep!

Nah, I'm kidding. My problem with technology is that it's too addicting for me. It makes my life seem so much shorter because I'm too preoccupied with useless things and my day ends up feeling much shittier like today. If it's the case with majority of people then maybe it isn't just my fault though.

EDIT: That doesn't apply to all of it though, technology that helps in fields like medicine is awesome to me.
 
Last edited:

Zexion~

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
17,100
Reaction score
862
Going through life based on the decisions of other humans is bad enough, but technology? Nah i'm good
 

Conspirator.

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
19,435
Reaction score
3,378
Well because at least I did it myself. I'd rather experience between what is good and bad and get a general idea of life instead of never know and live as a sheep to technology.

Basically this.
 

Kishi Uzumaki

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
5,362
Reaction score
646
Moderate use of technology is enough for me and what will happen, if you lose every technical stuff after getting used to it ?

how much the technology develops, there will always be weaknesses that will be used against it and with this bed, it won't be far telling me, what to do in my bed and what not to lol
 

BlacLord™

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
16,201
Reaction score
1,503
The bed looks good and the guy is pretty hot.

I'm sold.
 

Prometheus Beta

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
877
Reaction score
111
I think this is the least of the problems that technological progress will start creating in the near future and certainly in the more distant future.

The greatest problem is that technological progress at this point, combined with the growth of artificial intelligence, is making it possible to automate more and more human tasks.

For example, these days trading in financial markets is becoming an automated thing: investment banks now do a lot of their trading in the markets through an automated process called "algorithmic trading". And the algorithms doing all of that complex strategic trading are actually written by a very small team of computer-science nerds ("quants"), who end up getting paid a huge amount of money.

In the future this problem of intelligent automation cutting away at the human labour market will become a serious one because machines will pretty much always take up a greater number of tasks than the number of people required to create, programme and maintain them.

And the only solution, frankly a worst case scenario but I see few other alternatives, that comes to my mind, is governments making the right to reproduce a licensed right, and no, there is nothing unprecedented about such a system - think of the Chinese one-child policy, except more elaborate.

Ultimately, governments will inevitably have to face the need of regulating the size of their populations. The Malthusian alternative will probably be nature and human nature doing it for us through civil unrest and all that it will entail, created by technologically generated, increasing unemployment.

So even if we don't end up creating Skynet and maybe the terminator, technological progress will at some point actually become a problem.
 

Jazzy Stardust

Banned
Legendary
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
13,494
Reaction score
987
The future=laziness

Technology just makes things more easier, if everything becomes that way people will pay even less attention to detail and our society will become babies who need the support of technology to make it through the day.
 

YowYan

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Dec 9, 2010
Messages
15,124
Reaction score
1,838
No thanks. Too much monitoring. I already feel uncomfy with the built-in camera in laptops and smartphone.
 

Brian Griffin

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2014
Messages
717
Reaction score
57
Michael Bay's Transformer 5 will have a new Transformer that can transform in to a bed :devil:

believe it
 

Transcendence

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jan 11, 2013
Messages
11,636
Reaction score
1,451
I'm watching a video on those computers and they seem pretty amazing, too bad they aren't practical enough.

Quantum computers are completely practical. Hell, Quantum entanglement commonly seen in Sci-Fi (like a hologram type copy of you) is possible. We just need to master Quantum mechanics and theorem to that point, and we're not that far off.
 

SolarSpider

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
972
Reaction score
104
Quantum computers are completely practical. Hell, Quantum entanglement commonly seen in Sci-Fi (like a hologram type copy of you) is possible. We just need to master Quantum mechanics and theorem to that point, and we're not that far off.

Not at their current $
 
Top