Gay marriage?

Bronze

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,221
No they can't marry them because the animal can't agree to the marriage since they can't communicate with us.

...Oh no, animals can communicate; not in depth as we humans could, but regardless are capable of doing so. They have feelings, they can feel pain, they can feel love. What you're doing now, is denying the marriage of human and animal, which is denying their love. That is same as straight people do to homosexuals.
 

The Amazing Spider Man

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
8,994
Reaction score
877
There is a small matter of "consent". Yuri has to understand your question and say "yes" to it... Or you would be booked for rape..

You must be registered for see images


Just straight killed the mans dreams yo
 

Uzumaki Macho

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
6,663
Reaction score
299
...Oh no, animals can communicate; not in depth as we humans could, but regardless are capable of doing so. They have feelings, they can feel pain, they can feel love. What you're doing now, is denying the marriage of human and animal, which is denying their love. That is same as straight people do to homosexuals.
You can't prove that the animal actually loves the human so I'm not denying anything. Conservitard please tell me why gays shouldn't be able to marry?
 

Bronze

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,221
You can't prove that the animal actually loves the human so I'm not denying anything. Conservitard please tell me why gays shouldn't be able to marry?

You must be registered for see images
 

Bronze

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,221
Ok that's just a picture of a dog laying on a man. Doesn't show that the dog wants to marry him.

Obviously they can't marry each other with financial problems. But hey, EpicBoss HD showed one.
 

Uzumaki Macho

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
6,663
Reaction score
299
You must be registered for see images
Oh look, another conservitard. That is just a human kissing a dog that doesn't even know what's going on, no signs that the dog wants to marry him. Tell me why gay marriage shouldn't be legal?
 

Uzumaki Macho

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
6,663
Reaction score
299
Obviously they can't marry each other with financial problems. But hey, EpicBoss HD showed one.
Funny how you still haven't answered my question. Why should gay marriage be illegal?
 
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
189
Reaction score
12
Yuripee consented to marriage in my Angel Beats! FanFic, so i guess it should be okay

You must be registered for see images
 

Bronze

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,221
Funny how you still haven't answered my question. Why should gay marriage be illegal?

Because it is unnatural by science and sin by religion. Marriage isn't all about love; it's about producing future generations for humanity to still continue to exist. This is the cycle of life, which started and still continues from Adam and Eve. Man and woman are able to continue this cycle, because their body is structured to do this for each other. Two people from the same *** cannot do this, as explained in science.

Gay marriage is violation of both science and religion. Beside that, I personally find it disgusting when two men fall over each other. No offence to homosexuals.
 

King Kendrick

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
288
LOL at people comparing a dog getting married to human to a human marrying another human .
 

King Kendrick

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
288
Because it is unnatural by science and sin by religion. Marriage isn't all about love; it's about producing future generations for humanity to still continue to exist. This is the cycle of life, which started and still continues from Adam and Eve. Man and woman are able to continue this cycle, because their body is structured to do this for each other. Two people from the same *** cannot do this, as explained in science.

Gay marriage is violation of both science and religion. Beside that, I personally find it disgusting when two men fall over each other. No offence to homosexuals.

Firstly, natural and unnatural are not moral guidance. To assume that natural equals good and unnatural equals bad, would be the Naturalistic fallacy, implying that planes, laptops, phones are all bad, while murder, cannibalism and rape are all good (as these things are natural). People need to understand that natural does not equal good, and unnatural does not equal bad.

'Nature' is a concept used to describe processes or things that occur outside of human control. If we say 'natural disaster', we imply this disaster was not a direct cause of humans, where as war, is not a natural disaster. If we imply a material is natural, it is saying it it formed by something other than humans, like processes or another species (honey for example). Then when it comes to behavior or instincts, we would say something that exists outside of human control is natural. Therefore if homosexuality or even same *** pairings exist in the animal kingdom, it would be impossible to argue that it is unnatural. Same *** behavior has been reported in the animal kingdom.
 

Bronze

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
15,769
Reaction score
1,221
Firstly, natural and unnatural are not moral guidance. To assume that natural equals good and unnatural equals bad, would be the Naturalistic fallacy, implying that planes, laptops, phones are all bad, while murder, cannibalism and rape are all good (as these things are natural). People need to understand that natural does not equal good, and unnatural does not equal bad.

'Nature' is a concept used to describe processes or things that occur outside of human control. If we say 'natural disaster', we imply this disaster was not a direct cause of humans, where as war, is not a natural disaster. If we imply a material is natural, it is saying it it formed by something other than humans, like processes or another species (honey for example). Then when it comes to behavior or instincts, we would say something that exists outside of human control is natural. Therefore if homosexuality or even same *** pairings exist in the animal kingdom, it would be impossible to argue that it is unnatural. Same *** behavior has been reported in the animal kingdom.

It's biologically unnatural if you want me to be very specific. And animals don't have freewill, like humans do.
 

Uzumaki Macho

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Messages
6,663
Reaction score
299
Because it is unnatural by science and sin by religion.
How is it unnatural it occurs in nature throughout thousands of species, including humans, so if it occurs in nature what makes it unnatural? Oh wait, your homophobic view is what makes it unnatural, not science. So what if it is a sin by some religions? Remember separation of church and state?
Marriage isn't all about love; it's about producing future generations for humanity to still continue to exist.
Actually, marriage is about love while sexual intercourse is about producing offspring to continue the species.
This is the cycle of life, which started and still continues from Adam and Eve. Man and woman are able to continue this cycle, because their body is structured to do this for each other. Two people from the same *** cannot do this, as explained in science.

Gay marriage is violation of both science and religion. Beside that, I personally find it disgusting when two men fall over each other. No offence to homosexuals.
1. You do realize that gay couples can use a surrogate in order to reproduce, right? Not to mention that they can also adopt children if they don't want to use a surrogate.

2. Adam and Eve is just fanfic.

3. Like I said earlier, it isn't violating science, and it doesn't matter if it violates religion

4. It doesn't matter if you don't like the idea of two guys having ***.
 

King Kendrick

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
288
It's biologically unnatural if you want me to be very specific. And animals don't have freewill, like humans do.

...Oh no, animals can communicate; not in depth as we humans could, but regardless are capable of doing so. They have feelings, they can feel pain, they can feel love. What you're doing now, is denying the marriage of human and animal, which is denying their love. That is same as straight people do to homosexuals.
Much of the anti-gay-marriage argument rests on two commonly held assumptions: Life-long exclusive mate-bonding for purposes of rearing joint offspring is natural, and homosexuality is unnatural.

Both assumptions have little basis in fact.

Homosexual acts have, in fact, now been widely documented across a range of mammal species (that's right -- we're 'outing' mammals!), including our closest relatives, apes and monkeys.

Research published this week in the journal Public Library of Science ONE showed that one reason that male homosexuality has survived (even though gay men produce fewer offspring than straight men) that the 'gay gene' must be somehow beneficial to women, or it would have been eliminated from the gene pool.

Meanwhile, there seems to be nothing particularly 'natural' about marriage. Only about 3% of mammal species are monogamous -- meaning they cohabitate -- and few of these species mate for life. And nearly each partner in these 'animal marriages' engage in extra-pair mating. Lifelong sexual loyalty in nature is, it turns out, a vanishingly rare commodity.

It turns out that both marriage and homosexuality are, in fact, both common for our species. As research at Center for Neuroeconomics Studies in California has shown, human attachment behaviors depend on the same 'bonding' molecule called oxytocin, also found in other mammals. When the human brain releases oxytocin, we immediately begin to care about those around us: family, friends, and even complete strangers. This effect is so unfocused, that we also care about nonhumans, too, including dogs, cats or stranded whales. We name our cars, and cry when we sell our houses.

Oxytocin is also the basis for virtuous behaviors towards strangers. Researchers in my lab have shown that in humans, oxytocin promotes trustworthiness, generosity, and empathy. These virtues make the free societies we live in possible -- without oxytocin we would need Big Brother monitoring every human interaction to eliminate crime, cruelty, and selfishness.

Because the oxytocin attachment system is a blunt instrument, it is not surprising that we see long-term same-*** partners. Our highly evolved, inherently flexible, human attachment system allows us to have a morality -- a love beyond the self -- that far exceeds anything found in our mammal relatives. So, long-term attachment between genders and within a gender should be viewed as natural as the care and affection we quite easily show to those around us.

Source : Paul J Zak Ph.D.
 
Joined
May 25, 2014
Messages
189
Reaction score
12
Much of the anti-gay-marriage argument rests on two commonly held assumptions: Life-long exclusive mate-bonding for purposes of rearing joint offspring is natural, and homosexuality is unnatural.

Both assumptions have little basis in fact.

Homosexual acts have, in fact, now been widely documented across a range of mammal species (that's right -- we're 'outing' mammals!), including our closest relatives, apes and monkeys.

Research published this week in the journal Public Library of Science ONE showed that one reason that male homosexuality has survived (even though gay men produce fewer offspring than straight men) that the 'gay gene' must be somehow beneficial to women, or it would have been eliminated from the gene pool.

Meanwhile, there seems to be nothing particularly 'natural' about marriage. Only about 3% of mammal species are monogamous -- meaning they cohabitate -- and few of these species mate for life. And nearly each partner in these 'animal marriages' engage in extra-pair mating. Lifelong sexual loyalty in nature is, it turns out, a vanishingly rare commodity.

It turns out that both marriage and homosexuality are, in fact, both common for our species. As research at Center for Neuroeconomics Studies in California has shown, human attachment behaviors depend on the same 'bonding' molecule called oxytocin, also found in other mammals. When the human brain releases oxytocin, we immediately begin to care about those around us: family, friends, and even complete strangers. This effect is so unfocused, that we also care about nonhumans, too, including dogs, cats or stranded whales. We name our cars, and cry when we sell our houses.

Oxytocin is also the basis for virtuous behaviors towards strangers. Researchers in my lab have shown that in humans, oxytocin promotes trustworthiness, generosity, and empathy. These virtues make the free societies we live in possible -- without oxytocin we would need Big Brother monitoring every human interaction to eliminate crime, cruelty, and selfishness.

Because the oxytocin attachment system is a blunt instrument, it is not surprising that we see long-term same-*** partners. Our highly evolved, inherently flexible, human attachment system allows us to have a morality -- a love beyond the self -- that far exceeds anything found in our mammal relatives. So, long-term attachment between genders and within a gender should be viewed as natural as the care and affection we quite easily show to those around us.

Source : Paul J Zak Ph.D.

That is very interesting. So, the study provides evidence that homosexuality is a natural possibility in every human?
 
Top