Honestly he wouldn't care or give a fuk!
LOL yea ok just like Sai wouldn't give a fuk if Ino was murdered, or Kakashi wouldn't give a fuk if Konoha was destroyed, and Hinata wouldn't give a fuk if Naruto was mutilated, ok. :hooray:This is so true. Lol
Hey you said it not me. LolLOL yea ok just like Sai wouldn't give a fuk if Ino was murdered, or Kakashi wouldn't give a fuk if Konoha was destroyed, and Hinata wouldn't give a fuk if Naruto was mutilated, ok. :hooray:
Hey you said it not me. Lol
It's not surprising, when the aforementioned member has stated stuff like Tsunade beating Itachi, MS Obito etc in the past.lol at kh defending katsuya
This is a new low for him.It's not surprising, when the aforementioned member has stated stuff like Tsunade beating Itachi, MS Obito etc in the past.
Yes, it's prbaly ly going to be hard to make it into an action plot though, who is really going to **** with sakura or sasuke....maybe orochimaru lolI want a SasuSaku movie omfg
No reread, I said the Wood dragon, and neither did Hashirama tank the TBB directly, he covered himself from the debree and the explosion.What do you mean he "moved" his chakra? And if the mokuton without chakra was "nothing", it would not have tanked a TBB with zero damage, which is a feat that only PS and other similar chakra constructs can replicate.
No. Shinra tensei is a strong attack and destroys the landscape, but the damage per unit area is far less than other attacks, like a bijuudama or a PS slash. It's similar to the Bed of nails experiment. A single nail pops a balloon with ease, but a bed of nails does not, since the pressure is equally distributed. It's the reason why plenty of fodders survived CST without Katsuyu. Same principle with a bijuudama There's no way they would survive while being in a bijuudamas blast radius, without protection. Hence, mokuton hobi tanks CST with ease.
I don't know about your "without chakra" drivel, but Mokuton Hobi has better tanking feats than Katsuyu, as I've established.
It vaporises or destroys Katsuyu, which is all that matters.
Maybe. .. men are the "abused" in the abusive relationship.Could this mean that some women are disguised as men here? Since I have seen more men gendered people defending that pairing here, than female gendered ones?