You don't even have a purpose with this thread. You are just trying to bring down Naruto and Sasuke's position because you know that Sakura is the weakest of the team.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
I simply stated that the Sannin have for experince as shinobi then Team 7 their students, I then asked if that meant they were weren't surpassed completely. I also stated that if you argued that Naruto and Sasuke do have more experince then their teachers that I wouldn't be in total disagreement because they have taken down powerful opponents. I also acknowlage that the same argument couldn't be applied to Sakura because it's evendently clear that she doesn't have as much medical experince as Tsunade (Tsunade > Sakura by my own admission). How am I wanking Sakura when I'm admitting and acknowledging her inferiority to her teammates and Tsunade? I don't need to fool anyone about anything with any attitude because were on the internet guy!
Because you're equating Sakura's lack of experience and power to Naruto and Sasuke somehow being under Jiraiya and Orochimaru. Jiraiya and Orochimaru mostly have experience against weak soldier ninjas, Naruto and Sasuke fought three different virtual gods of Shinobi, Naruto and Sasuke's experience fighting Obito, Madara, and Kaguya surpass the Sannin's experience fighting fodders.
K, lol Lol
Apparently not, since you yourself are doubting it in your OP and many people don't agree as well. It's not a fact, it's a hypothesis of yours which, as the quotes I've provided in the previous post, you yourself are not sure of.
If you knew something about logic, then you'd know that if your reasoning is based on a thesis (in your case - Sannins' expirience > Team 7 expirience), all the conclusions you'll come to in process are only valid if this thesis is confirmed to be true. Since it's not confirmed to be true, this the whole thread of yours is pointless, son, as your reasoning is based on something that's not proven to be what you say it is. That is my original point.
You just mind ****ed me......K, lol Lol
Apparently not, since you yourself are doubting it in your OP and many people don't agree as well. It's not a fact, it's a hypothesis of yours which, as the quotes I've provided in the previous post, you yourself are not sure of.
If you knew something about logic, then you'd know that if your reasoning is based on a thesis (in your case - Sannins' expirience > Team 7 expirience), all the conclusions you'll come to in process are only valid if this thesis is confirmed to be true. Since it's not confirmed to be true, this the whole thread of yours is pointless, son, as your reasoning is based on something that's not proven to be what you say it is. That is my original point.
If you still didn't get it, I'll write in a simplier manner:
Before trying to find out if they have surpassed their teachers despite the suppositious expirience differences, you have yet to estimate the said differences and prove that your estimation is correct. Until you do that, any discussing is meaningless.
However, I even had accepted your point of view on my 1st post in this thread (since I didn't and still don't think that you do realize the meaning of what I've written above), and have based my logic on the assumption that you're correct.
Even if it's put like this, the thread is dumb. You're still trying to compare the characters using the factor that can't be used to compare them due to the age differences. It's simple maths:
A1 - age of Team 7, E1 - their expirience, A2 - age of Sannin, E2 - their expirience.
B - the set of possible values.
To solve this task, we need to find out which symbol ( =, > or <) is between the proportions: E1 / A1 ? E2 / A2
We approximately know the ages, so it's safe to type:
E1 / 30 ? E2 / 70
As you can see, we don't know the values of E1 and E2, and we don't know the values of E2 and E1, and we don't know if E1 = E2 according to the conditions you've set in your OP.
That means that we can't say if E1 / 30 = E2 / 70, E1 / 30 < E2 / 70 or E1 / 30 > E2 / 70, and B = {∅}, hence the conditions you've set are not enough to answer your question, which means that the whole thread is meaningless.
That's the detailed proof that your thread is a failure. Any further arguing is pointless, If you still don't understand how wrong you're here - nothing's gonna help ya
How am equating Sakura's experince to her teammates when I spefically distinguished her lack of experience to them and Tsunade's. Like did you you read the post? Have you read anything I said? Even if I agree with you on something you'll conjur or find another argument guy.
Another tangent...K, lol Lol
Apparently not, since you yourself are doubting it in your OP and many people don't agree as well. It's not a fact, it's a hypothesis of yours which, as the quotes I've provided in the previous post, you yourself are not sure of.
If you knew something about logic, then you'd know that if your reasoning is based on a thesis (in your case - Sannins' expirience > Team 7 expirience), all the conclusions you'll come to in process are only valid if this thesis is confirmed to be true. Since it's not confirmed to be true, this the whole thread of yours is pointless, son, as your reasoning is based on something that's not proven to be what you say it is. That is my original point.
If you still didn't get it, I'll write in a simplier manner:
Before trying to find out if they have surpassed their teachers despite the suppositious expirience differences, you have yet to estimate the said differences and prove that your estimation is correct. Until you do that, any discussing is meaningless.
However, I even had accepted your point of view on my 1st post in this thread (since I didn't and still don't think that you do realize the meaning of what I've written above), and have based my logic on the assumption that you're correct.
Even if it's put like this, the thread is dumb. You're still trying to compare the characters using the factor that can't be used to compare them due to the age differences. It's simple maths:
A1 - age of Team 7, E1 - their expirience, A2 - age of Sannin, E2 - their expirience.
B - the set of possible values.
To solve this task, we need to find out which symbol ( =, > or <) is between the proportions: E1 / A1 ? E2 / A2
We approximately know the ages, so it's safe to type:
E1 / 30 ? E2 / 70
As you can see, we don't know the values of E1 and E2, and we don't know the values of E2 and E1, and we don't know if E1 = E2 according to the conditions you've set in your OP.
That means that we can't say if E1 / 30 = E2 / 70, E1 / 30 < E2 / 70 or E1 / 30 > E2 / 70, and B = {∅}, hence the conditions you've set are not enough to answer your question, which means that the whole thread is meaningless.
That's the detailed proof that your thread is a failure. Any further arguing is pointless, If you still don't understand how wrong you're here - nothing's gonna help ya
Problem is your argument has become increasingly incomprehensible. Sasuke and Naruto's experience>>>>>>>>>>Jiraiya and Orochimaru's due to people like Obito, Madara, and Kaguya.
I've edited it a bit, since I forgot to add some possible cases
Another baseless, pathetic attempt to counter logic and maths, which you apprently didn't even read according to your reaction, since it's a direct answer to your OP's question (it's predictable though, I didn't even count on you understanding it, simple maths is too hard for a fellow like ya). I'll remain you crying, being stomped by arguments which you're not even able to comprehend, let alone counter. Lol
Are you ****ing serious? I said just that in my initial post! Then again several times after that! You just quoted my comment that is consistent to what you just said! Like dude..... Go back n read..//
I'm not going to argue with someone's child about trivial math and basic vocabulary and chomprehension. There's nothing to counter because none of your post are consistent or conducive to the question I asked. It's all off topic' your off topic' this post I'm typing is off topic. You haven't yet appropriately responded to my initial post, you've jus been intrusive and have gone on about total irrelevance. Your done!I've edited it a bit, since I forgot to add some possible cases
Another baseless, pathetic attempt to counter logic and maths, which you apprently didn't even read according to your reaction, since it's a direct answer to your OP's question (it's predictable though, I didn't even count on you understanding it, simple maths is too hard for a fellow like ya). I'll remain you crying, being stomped by arguments which you're not even able to comprehend, let alone counter. Lol
What you've typed here clearly indicates that you didn't read the post I've spent quite some time on (the one that contains lots of numbers you don't understand), as it answers absolutely every single question you've asked in this thread, in a detailed manner.
The only thing I'm ashamed of is entraining your incompetence. You've made it abundemtly clear that your not interested in discussing the topic at hand or staying on topic in genral. I've broken down the question in many ways, repeated and reirated my question but you can't keep up. I'm not crying nor bantering like your are dude but enjoy yourself kid.What you've typed here clearly indicates that you didn't read the post I've spent quite some time on (the one that contains lots of numbers you don't understand), as it answers absolutely every single question you've asked in this thread, in a detailed manner.
You, kid, need to learn that if so many people tell you that there is something wrong with you, it's a reason for you to think it might be the case Lol
By now you've ashamed youself to the extent where people started to add your fails in their signatures. You'll be known as one of the most stoopid children on this base, just because you were too dumb and stubborn to stop in time.
That's really some achievement of yours, congrats XD
And yeah, please, continue crying and posting nonsense. Your salty tears only entertain us, along with your stupidity
You really want to get more, don't you? Lol
My answer @bold:
Next question:
My answer @bold:
Next question:
My answer @bold:
Next question:
Apparently you're too stupid to realize I've already answered it, but I'll repeat nonetheless. @bold:
Next:
Apparently it's too hard to you to realize that your question had been answered multiple times in this thread, not only by me, but by the others as well. Once again: It is impossible to use this statement, whether it's true or false, to determine if the Sannin were completely surpassed or not. The quote is the same as in the previous question of yours.
