Death Penalty And Why Its Necessary

90sKids98

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
201
Simple. Theres no purpose in keeping someone in jail for life. Why not just end their life quickly like throwing out garbage? I mean that is why those criminals are in their in the first place, b/c they're garbage. Life In Prison takes up Prison Space, and costs more money that we can use for better things. People who are against are just cowards.

And that eye for an eye makes the world go blind statement is bs a coward made to make himself/herself look better
 

Vapid

Banned
Elite
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
470
What? The death penalty is the best thing humanity has ever created.
 

IcedFox

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Aug 29, 2012
Messages
1,158
Reaction score
88
In the end, I'm in between whether or not there should be a death penalty.

I get where you're coming from, over-crowding of prisons and such.

But killing murders is far to easy, the will not suffer for it.
 

David1996

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Aug 15, 2010
Messages
4,112
Reaction score
128
People enjoy their time in prison.
 

Yuri Uzuma

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
189
Reaction score
19
If you are talking seriously, then there are better ways to deal with them. For example, compulsory labour. Thus, they would be useful for society and they could cover up for their living costs. Moreover, if talking about serial criminals (murders) we can use torture sessions. Anyway, dealing with the same as they did would just continue the circle of hatred as Nagato said. We would be the same as they.
 

Raxido

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
778
Reaction score
65
In the end, I'm in between whether or not there should be a death penalty.

I get where you're coming from, over-crowding of prisons and such.

But killing murders is far to easy, the will not suffer for it.

Honestly at this point theres no reason to give 69 ****s if they suffer or not. I rather them just be put to death if their sentence is life or an exaggerated amount of years (ex; 50). But then again thats just me and i really dont have the say so think about it
 

Tantalus Thief

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 15, 2014
Messages
9,095
Reaction score
755
Hot thread incoming. I agree with the death penalty for murderers who know what they were doing.
 

Benjamin King

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
155
There is no saving for criminals. This is why:

You must be registered for see images

Medical research shows the brain of a criminal functions more unstable than a normal brain. This is due to the genetic influence or inheritance causes this error.

Brain structure and function

The amygdala — a part of the brain involved in fear, aggression and social interactions — is implicated in crime. Among the research that points to this link is a neuroimaging study led by Dustin Pardini, PhD, of the University of Pittsburgh. His team found that 26-year-old men with lower amygdala volumes were more than three times more likely to be aggressive, violent and to show psychopathic traits three years later than men of the same age with more normal-sized amygdalas — independent of factors including history of violence and social background (Biological Psychiatry, 2013).
Other research, such as an fMRI study led by psychologist Andrea Glenn, PhD, of the University of Alabama, suggest that amygdala functioning — not just size — is also more likely to be reduced among those with psychopathic tendencies (Molecular Psychiatry, 2009).
At least one study indicates that such deficits may appear long before people commit crimes. Adrian Raine, DPhil, of the department of criminology at the University of Pennsylvania, led a study with Yu Gao, PhD, at CUNY-Brooklyn that examined fear conditioning, which is dependent on amygdala function, in a group of 1,795 3-year-olds. The researchers put electrodes on the children's fingers while repeatedly playing two tones: one that was followed by a loud, unpleasant sound and another that was played alone. Subsequently, the difference in sweat responses to each tone by itself yielded a measure of each toddler's fear conditioning. Twenty years later, the team identified participants who had gone on to commit crimes and compared them with noncriminal counterparts, matching them on gender, ethnicity and social adversity. They found that those children who went on to commit crimes had "simply failed" to demonstrate fear conditioning, Raine says. In other words, they were fearless when most of us would be fearful. This finding suggests that deficits in the amygdala, which are indirectly identifiable as early as age 3, predispose to crime at age 23 (The American Journal of Psychiatry, 2010).
The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), which plays a major role in behavior regulation and impulsivity, has also been linked to crime. Psychologist Kent Kiehl, PhD, and colleagues at the University of New Mexico used fMRI to look at the brains of nearly 100 adult male inmates while they completed a cognitive task involving inhibitory control. They found that prisoners with lower ACC activity were twice as likely to reoffend four years after they left prison than prisoners with higher ACC activity (PNAS, 2013). While such studies need replication and extension, Raine says, they are "proof of the concept that there may be added value with bringing on board neurobiological information, including brain imaging information, for future prediction of violence."
Change brain to change behavior
If we know that certain brain characteristics may predispose some people to violence, what can we do about it? Intervene — and the earlier, the better, says Raine, author of "The Anatomy of Violence" (Random House, 2013).
In one intervention, for example, he and colleagues found that 3-year-olds who had been assigned to an enrichment program focused on nutrition, exercise and cognitive skills had better brain functioning at age 11 and a 34 percent reduction in criminal activity at age 23 when compared with a control group that did not receive the intervention (American Journal of Psychiatry, 2003). Intervening even earlier, David Olds, PhD, of the University of Colorado, has found that pregnant low-income mothers who were visited regularly by home nurses who talked to them about health, education and parenting were less likely to have children who were arrested by age 15 (Infant Mental Health Journal, 2006).
Even simple interventions may make a difference. In one preliminary study, prisoners assigned to a 10-week yoga class improved their impulse control (Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2013). In an earlier randomized-controlled trial of British prisoners, those who received vitamin, mineral and essential fatty acid supplements committed an average of 26.3 percent fewer offenses than those who had received the placebo. They also showed a reduction in offenses of more than 35 percent, while the placebo-taking prisoners' records remained stable (British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002). A study in the Netherlands replicated the effect, and now Raine is testing a similar intervention for children.
The bottom line, he says, is that "biology is not destiny. We can change the biological roots of crime and violence — there's no question about it."

You cannot save criminals by prisoning them; they are self-uncontrollable and unstable animals. It's a genetic cause which nothing can be done about it. So yes, the best solution is to kill them. It's a solution for the good of our society and good for them, to be honest.
 

Joon

DalbitEcho
Supreme
Joined
Aug 4, 2011
Messages
23,681
Reaction score
1,480
I thought the message behind prison/jail was for criminals to rehabilitate. My opinion on the Death Sentence was for criminal facing harsh crimes that are considered inhuman.
 

90sKids98

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
201
I thought the message behind prison/jail was for criminals to rehabilitate. My opinion on the Death Sentence was for criminal facing harsh crimes that are considered inhuman.

Nah Nah, Rehabilitaton is for juvenile kids. I learned it in my Business and Law Class last year.
 

Intuitive Mode Naruto

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
630
Reaction score
50
If you are talking seriously, then there are better ways to deal with them. For example, compulsory labour. Thus, they would be useful for society and they could cover up for their living costs. Moreover, if talking about serial criminals (murders) we can use torture sessions. Anyway, dealing with the same as they did would just continue the circle of hatred as Nagato said. We would be the same as they.

@ BOLD That's ****ed up bro. Just end 'em quickly. No need to make someone have to torture them.
 
Last edited:

Intuitive Mode Naruto

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
630
Reaction score
50
Of course it's needed. Criminals commit violent actions, and others suffer from them, so they need to face the consequences.

I'm not sure if you understand my post. I responded to the bolded portion but if you do understand then all I have to say is that torture is not needed, it's wanted.
 

Benjamin King

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
2,121
Reaction score
155
I'm not sure if you understand my post. I responded to the bolded portion but if you do understand then all I have to say is that torture is not needed, it's wanted.

You said ''Just end 'em quickly'' and now you say ''it's wanted''? It's contradiction.
 

90sKids98

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
201
I thought the message behind prison/jail was for criminals to rehabilitate. My opinion on the Death Sentence was for criminal facing harsh crimes that are considered inhuman.

We have enough criminals already to do that Slave Labor kind of stuff, no reason to use them. And torturing also cost money, do you think making thos injections and tasers and electrical chairs are free? No.
 

Fountain

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
5,415
Reaction score
367
Disagree, I've said it before, no one has the right to take someone's life away, even if it is a mother f still wrong.
 

Intuitive Mode Naruto

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
630
Reaction score
50
Disagree, I've said it before, no one has the right to take someone's life away, even if it is a mother f still wrong.

I disagree. If you selfishly murder someone then you deserve to have your life taken away from you as well. And since you don't agree with that, what do you suggest we do?


Why?
 
Top