Feminist contradictions are astonishing

[slayerdanger]

Here's a feminist contradiction for you. The majority of feminists think women should wear whatever amount of clothing they want, but if women do wear little amount of clothing, they're making themselves *** objects. Also, feminists will get angry about sexy female characters in fiction, but they'll get so happy seeing male characters who they find attractive with little clothing on. To feminists like this, I have to ask them, do they want all humans to stop feeling sexual feelings? How is that possible? There's no magic pill that turns humans asexual, and I sure as hell wouldn't take one for a bunch of crazy radical strangers on the internet.

Feminists need to understand we "objectify" ourselves. Whenever we go through puberty, we start getting sexual thoughts, our bodies literally "objectify" themselves, it's human biology 101. The media doesn't objectify women, neither do men, nor the nonexistent patriarchy. Your own body objectifies you, that is the case for both men and women. Don't like it? Too bad, try finding a way to make yourself asexual then because that's what it seems you want society to be. Thing is, that's impossible. Anyways, what do you think about feminist propaganda, misandry, etc.?

 

[The Masked Sage]

Feminists are stupid. People should either be smart in this world or they should learn their place

 

[Naruto.]

The only thing I hate about feminism is that women can drool over so called 'handsome or hot' guys, and even make comments like, "Omg, he is yummy", and if a guy calls a girl 'hot', he is automatically labeled as a creep, pervert and a sexist. Double standards. Smh.

 

[KcMSean]

Feminists can go fvck themselves (they probably already do)
These people shout for equality, while at the same time doing all they can to make things worse for men. Its one thing to want equality, I'm 100% for that. But the feminists, at least usually in the media, are not okay with being simply equals.

 

[Tobi98]

"the media and society doesn't obectify" lol wut

 

[Naruto.]

"the media and society doesn't obectify" lol wut

Lel. Exactly. Commericals nowadays are way too sexualized. As they say, *** sells. :/

 

[YowYan]

Yes, women who claim to be feminists but go out dressed like an escort contradicts. No, they are not to blame if they'd get raped while dressed like that.

Girls can get pleased when seeing david beckham shirtless, ditto for boys. That's not an issue. It's men that drool constantly and through that habit they'll program their minds to hunt-mode when thinking of girls in general.
You don't see a hot guy walking down a bridge in Egypt getting leered at by every single girl in a way it makes you worry about your safety.

 

[NineSNS]

Every extreme viewpoint has its contradictions, because most people want to have their cake and eat it too.

 

[slayerdanger]

"the media and society doesn't obectify" lol wut

They literally don't. The cause of that "objectification" is our own desire to see sexual things. *** sells, supply and demand. If people didn't buy magazjnes, bikini model calendars, etc. There woukd be no "objectification" in the media, what's a way to end this? There is none, unless we all magically became asexual. Feminists preach *** is ok, but then say society objectifies women, that is a contradiction.

 

[Tobi98]

They literally don't. The cause of that "objectification" is our own desire to see sexual things. *** sells, supply and demand. If people didn't buy magazjnes, bikini model calendars, etc. There woukd be no "objectification" in the media, what's a way to end this? There is none, unless we all magically became asexual. Feminists preach *** is ok, but then say society objectifies women, that is a contradiction.

That only means the objectification works, not that it doesn't exist

 

[SasukeTheViper EMS]

The thing about feminists is that they want women to be viewed as strong, capable individuals, yet almost always play the victim card.

 

[slayerdanger]

Yes, women who claim to be feminists but go out dressed like an escort contradicts. No, they are not to blame if they'd get raped while dressed like that.

Girls can get pleased when seeing david beckham shirtless, ditto for boys. That's not an issue. It's men that drool constantly and through that habit they'll program their minds to hunt-mode when thinking of girls in general.
You don't see a hot guy walking down a bridge in Egypt getting leered at by every single man in a way it makes you worry about your safety.

What is the feminist solution for dealing with these males in hunt mode? As far as I know, there's always been men and women in hunt mode throughout all of time. It's not something new, and isn't something that can be protested against since it is already illegal. Also, what is hunt mode by your definition? I consider that to be making unwanted sexual advances, rape, etc.

 

[xpatamonx]

Feminists want women to be seen as sexual beings just like men.
We have thoughts we think about it all the time we want to be accepted as sexual beings and not objects see the difference
It's like in school when they go over dress code they always say ladies boys can't concentrate cover up them shoulders. Like seriously that ain't my problem. When they make it a women's problem that's objectifying but like you said we ALL have these sexual thoughts and putting on a women is objectyfying not the fact that those thoughts occur
That line of thinking putting it on the women's shoulders is backwards. Goes along with if she was dressed slutty then she was asking to be raped
Uhhhm no he would've anyway

Rant over sorry if I rustled your jimmies

 

[YowYan]

They literally don't. The cause of that "objectification" is our own desire to see sexual things. *** sells, supply and demand. If people didn't buy magazjnes, bikini model calendars, etc. There woukd be no "objectification" in the media, what's a way to end this? There is none, unless we all magically became asexual. Feminists preach *** is ok, but then say society objectifies women, that is a contradiction.

You're right. The media is not the problem perse. If you ignore the explicit images that your young mind absorbs subconsciously.

Society? Definitely objectifies women. In arab, african and indian countries women are property. In the western countries, women are seen as a trophy.

 

[slayerdanger]

That only means the objectification works, not that it doesn't exist

But why give such a foul name to something that has no solution? World hunger has a higher chance of ending than "objectification" ever ending. Seeing as how most people in the world want world hunger to end, but a lot of people in the world like me don't even believe sexual objectification in the media and society even exist.

 

[Indora]

Is feminism even necessary in the western world?

 

[slayerdanger]

Is feminism even necessary in the western world?

No, it isn't, seeing as there is no concrete proof women are treated unequally in the western world.

 

[xpatamonx]

They literally don't. The cause of that "objectification" is our own desire to see sexual things. *** sells, supply and demand. If people didn't buy magazjnes, bikini model calendars, etc. There woukd be no "objectification" in the media, what's a way to end this? There is none, unless we all magically became asexual. Feminists preach *** is ok, but then say society objectifies women, that is a contradiction.

I think it comes down to the way it's done. *** sells and nothing's wrong with that there's just a better way. It's all about the tone and there'll always be misinterpretations. Like there's getting looked at then leered at

 

[YowYan]

What is the feminist solution for dealing with these males in hunt mode? As far as I know, there's always been men and women in hunt mode throughout all of time. It's not something new, and isn't something that can be protested against since it is already illegal. Also, what is hunt mode by your definition? I consider that to be making unwanted sexual advances, rape, etc.

Yes, I'm talking about the aggressive approach, mostly.
And Idk what feminist organisations organize but my solution would be just making sure kids/teens are aware of the objectification issue. I guess that's pretty much an individual resolve and impossible to achieve in large communities.

 

[slayerdanger]

I think it comes down to the way it's done. *** sells and nothing's wrong with that there's just a better way. It's all about the tone and there'll always be misinterpretations. Like there's getting looked at then leered at

I don't understand how there could be different tones of selling ***. It's all showing people with few clothes, or doing sexy stuff. As for the leering, that's subjective, some people have angry looking faces that make it look like they're leering. There's nothing that can be done about leering.