ISIS Leader DEAD

[Lady M]

The Pentagon is denying it.

 

[Sonne2]

No, the U.S was trying to get the Syrian President killed like Gadhafi in Libya.

Exactly, the U.S. figured that since they bullied Gaddafi, that they can get Assad, hahaha Russia was like gtfo.

Wish the Russians helped out Libya, Libya would be in a better non-barbaric state compared to what it is now after nato intervention. And lets not forget about Tawergha and all the displaced people of Libya and Syria. Nato and murika, killin strong men then asking questions later.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Bro, you'll be killing much more innocent people in the end.

Maybe he's not wrong...if I had to choose between terminating two countries, and letting it spiral into nuclear war..

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Exactly, the U.S. figured that since they bullied Gaddafi, that they can get Assad, hahaha Russia was like gtfo.

Wish the Russians helped out Libya, Libya would be in a better non-barbaric state compared to what it is now after nato intervention. And lets not forget about Tawergha and all the displaced people of Libya and Syria. Nato and murika, killin strong men then asking questions later.

It's also terrible how Libya was in the media right until they killed Gadhafi but now it's worse.

 

[HiddenSound]

I have not heard a thing out of Libya.

 

[Hàdes1]

Thank God

Hopefully The whole ISIS will be destroyed

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Maybe he's not wrong...if I had to choose between terminating two countries, and letting it spiral into nuclear war..

The U.S messed them up in the first place (well, helped), and let's say the U.S did use the nukes, how would the other countries react? Certainly, they would see it as an even bigger threat, and want to get rid of it.

 

[HiddenSound]

The Pentagon is denying it.

I saw that too, but I thought they were denying that they killed a set of ISIS leaders, not THE leader. And pretty sure that was on the 4th, while this was posted on the 6th, if that's of any consequence.

 

[Punk Hazard]

The U.S messed them up in the first place (well, helped), and let's say the U.S did use the nukes, how would the other countries react? Certainly, they would see it as an even bigger threat, and want to get rid of it.

Not necessarily. Nah, on second thought, that isn't the way to go simply because taking out two entire countries is just...it's just a whole new dark point for humanity's history that I'd rather not exist I suppose.

 

[sirius49]

CIA created ISIS = Terrorists.
CIA Created AL QAEDA = Terrorist.

USA is the biggest Terrorist.

 

[Sonne2]

It's also terrible how Libya was in the media right until they killed Gadhafi but now it's worse.

This further reinforces the fact that the media is a TOOL OF WAR. Also they are not reporting on the state of Libya, because it will show American citizens that democracy is not for everyone.


And I'm very upset at the way nato and the us tore down a stable and developed african nation in a heartbeat with no hesitation, yet when they were going for syria they hesitated, and russia stepped in, why didn't russia help out libya!?


okay done ranting....sigh

 

[Lady M]

I saw that too, but I thought they were denying that they killed a set of ISIS leaders, not THE leader. And pretty sure that was on the 4th, while this was posted on the 6th, if that's of any consequence.

The Daily Beast said the Pentagon denied killing the ISIS Chief.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Not necessarily. Nah, on second thought, that isn't the way to go simply because taking out two entire countries is just...it's just a whole new dark point for humanity's history that I'd rather not exist I suppose.

Also, I think U.S does truly have the force to completely eliminate ISIS without nukes. I mean how big is ISIS really? However, I do fear that the U.S is letting their guard down. As a Muslim, I'm actually very afraid that ISIS will try to replicate 9/11. That would mean bad news for me.

 

[HiddenSound]

CIA created ISIS = Terrorists.
CIA Created AL QAEDA = Terrorist.

USA is the biggest Terrorist.

There it is.

 

[Cunning Linguist]

Not necessarily. Nah, on second thought, that isn't the way to go simply because taking out two entire countries is just...it's just a whole new dark point for humanity's history that I'd rather not exist I suppose.

But what if every other country agreed that this was the correct course of action to take? It would be several million deaths, but could save significantly more in the process. And it would be ethically sound if all the other countries agreed to it

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

The Daily Beast said the Pentagon denied killing the ISIS Chief.

Who's alt are you?

 

[Punk Hazard]

CIA created ISIS = Terrorists.
CIA Created AL QAEDA = Terrorist.

USA is the biggest Terrorist.

You got no idea how scary this is to me.

 

[HiddenSound]

But what if every other country agreed that this was the correct course of action to take? It would be several million deaths, but could save significantly more in the process. And it would be ethically sound if all the other countries agreed to it

I'm for the greater good as much as the next guy, but several million deaths....

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

But what if every other country agreed that this was the correct course of action to take? It would be several million deaths, but could save significantly more in the process. And it would be ethically sound if all the other countries agreed to it

I don't think it's that bad to bring out the nukes nor do I think every country will agree. And what about the surrounding countries, they risk radiation.

 

[Lady M]

Who's alt are you?

I will PM you.