no its not...its base off of opinion its debatable
but by portrayal the one zero faced was stronger
you logic at that is... theres no way zero can be that much stronger than pre jellal
What? Portrayal was obviously showing that the Dragon Force Natsu used against Zero was inferior to the one that stomped Jellal.
Portrayal, as well as feats, put Etherion DF in a higher calibre than the one used against Zero.
I don't care about Jellal and Zero since I find them irrelevant here, but personally, pre-TS, I find them more or less equal, with Jellal having a slight edge due to his speed.
Etherion DF Natsu defeated Jellal in one tower-busting punch. No nukes were even needed. Flame of Rebuke DF Natsu had to use his strongest attack to defeat Zero.
From that, you can see, Etherion DF >> Flame of Rebuke DF
I see Jellal a little bit weaker than FoR DF btw.
What's wrong with my logic again?