Which has been killed the most times?

[WolfHaley]

So, a simple question, which of these have been killed the most times in this manga?

1. Danzo
2. Obito
3. Logic

Poll up soon

 

[DeviantArt]

Logic
Obito
Danzo

 

[ugh]

Logic .

 

[Tennis Robot]

Logic is abiotic. Danzo and Obito have both died once.

 

[Eternal Sage]

Logic neg diffs obito and danzo 2v1

 

[NukaCola]

Fiction doesn't need logic.

 

[WolfHaley]

Logic is abiotic. Danzo and Obito have both died once.

You must be registered for see links

 

[Risuna23]

Logic got butt raped for more than 4 years.:|

 

[UCE]

Logic
Trash= danzou
and pedo=obito.

 

[Ōkami]

Fiction doesn't need logic.

Depends on the fiction really.

You can't have a book portraying cops solving crimes then suddenly a dragon shows up.

 

[Conspirator.]

It's a real shame that in terms of quantity, Stupidity>>>Logic in this world, so in that regard Kishi's manga is very realistic and represents the every day world we live in.

 

[WolfHaley]

Depends on the fiction really.

You can't have a book portraying cops solving crimes then suddenly a dragon shows up.

I mean....you can.

 

[Eternal Sage]

I mean....you can.

Best cop book ever

 

[kimb]

Fiction doesn't need logic.

In a series like Naruto where the author takes the time to establish his own universe, creating his own logic, and setting his own rules, logic is required. When the author goes against the established rules of his universe, he is then breaking/killing logic.

Ex. Bringing back the dead is fictional, but there are rules to bringing back the dead in Naruto. (edo tensei, rinne tennsei, etc)

Obito coming back to life goes against Kishimoto's established rules there for kills logic.

 

[HashiraMadara]

son goku....

 

[Ageha Jaeger]

In a series like Naruto where the author takes the time to establish his own universe, creating his own logic, and setting his own rules, logic is required. When the author goes against the established rules of his universe, he is then breaking/killing logic.

But what if the author has an explanation that his readers don't agree with?

 

[kimb]

But what if the author has an explanation that his readers don't agree with?

If the author had already explained or established something before it happens, theres nothing to disagree with.

But if the author explains something after it happens and it goes against what was previously established, its a retcon and readers have the right to disagree with it.

 

[NukaCola]

In a series like Naruto where the author takes the time to establish his own universe, creating his own logic, and setting his own rules, logic is required. When the author goes against the established rules of his universe, he is then breaking/killing logic.

Ex. Bringing back the dead is fictional, but there are rules to bringing back the dead in Naruto. (edo tensei, rinne tennsei, etc)

Obito coming back to life goes against Kishimoto's established rules there for kills logic.

People coming back to life is nothing new(e.g. Hagormo)

 

[Kirokill]

People coming back to life is nothing new(e.g. Hagormo)

Nagato Rinne-Tensei.
"Oh finally this suffering is over" Back into this life "wtf..."

 

[Jcub]

Depends on the fiction really.

You can't have a book portraying cops solving crimes then suddenly a dragon shows up.

Why not, stranger things have happened in fiction.

OP: Not Logic, everyone considers their 'Logic' to be absolute, yet only kish's actually matters, and I'm willing to bet he thinks its live and kicking. If you want to watch 'logic' die...watch Lost.