Why Evolution is bunk and scientific proof for creationism

[BlackFlame44]

There is no proof of creation

While Evolution has been tested as fact many times

 

[NarutoB]

There is no proof of creation

While Evolution has been tested as fact many times

No. It's more of a theory actually

 

[Sapiens Sequax Sex Semita]

No. It's more of a theory actually

so is gravity.

 

[Bronze]

No, it's merely a theory. According to the theory, we have a common ancestor. The fossil of this ''ancestor'' has so far not been discovered. Unless it's discovered, the theory stays as a theory.​

 

[Edo Ritsu]

Ths is y creationism is wrung!!!1

You must be registered for see images

Explain THAT!

 

[Yusuke Urameshi]

so is gravity.

There is a law and theory regarding gravity. Silly.

 

[NarutoB]

so is gravity.

What's your point?

 

[Sapiens Sequax Sex Semita]

There is a law and theory regarding gravity. Silly.

Theory > Law

law simply describes an observation theory explains it, while this makes it possible to be false they are generally well accepted as fact.

Ths is y creationism is wrung!!!1

You must be registered for see images

Explain THAT!

evee is a *****

What's your point?

Being a theory doesn't make something false in fact more often then not it means the opposite.

 

[Cruciatus]

Theory > Law

law simply describes an observation theory explains it, while this makes it possible to be false they are generally well accepted as fact.

Uh no, laws are facts, solid facts that cannot be denied. A theory can be argued against, and while it has lots of evidence to back it up, it's not enough to fully cement it as fact.

 

[NarutoB]

I'm not even religious and this thread is dumb as f*ck

 

[Yusuke Urameshi]

Theory > Law

law simply describes an observation theory explains it, while this makes it possible to be false they are generally well accepted as fact.

Are you trying to say that a theory becomes a law or that a theory is greater than a law (ya know, math notation)?

Either way, there is a Law of Universal Gravitation and also a theory. Evolution is merely a theory. Using gravity is moot.

 

[Dãrth1]

And your point is?

 

[Yukito Uchiha]

Theory > Law

law simply describes an observation theory explains it, while this makes it possible to be false they are generally well accepted as fact.

I think that it is the theory that after being tested evolves into law.. soo0
Law>theory

 

[Sapiens Sequax Sex Semita]

Uh no, laws are facts, solid facts that cannot be denied. A theory can be argued against, and while it has lots of evidence to back it up, it's not enough to fully cement it as fact.

..........
SCIENTIFIC laws are OBSERVATIONS. Theory explains those observation. that's how science works. In ACTUAL science THEORY trumps everything people tend to think the word theory and hypothesis are synonymous but theory's are hypothesis that have been proven correct by multiple independent source's. laws cant be proven or disproved except when our basic understanding of a subject changes or an observation that cant be disproved is made.

I think that it is the theory that after being tested evolves into law.. soo0
Law>theory

science exists to help us understand things law doesn't help you understand it just points it out a natural phenomena without testing, theory tests and explains it.


to all the law > theory people look it up.

 

[Naoya Minato]

I think that it is the theory that after being tested evolves into law.. soo0
Law>theory

A theory never becomes a law. :| A theory explains a law. The two are completely different in nature and both serve a different purpose.

People don't realize that ''theories'' and ''laws'' hold different meanings in science in comparison to their everyday definitions.

And to everyone calling it ''just a theory'', it's a scientific theory. That couldn't be more different from a regular ''theory''. What you guys are referring to is probably a hypothesis. I'll share a quote for the ones who do not understand.

Spoiler

In everyday use, theory means a guess or a hunch, something that maybe needs proof. In science, a theory is not a guess, not a hunch. It's a well-substantiated, well-supported, well-documented explanation for our observations. It ties together all the facts about something, providing an explanation that fits all the observations and can be used to make predictions. In science, theory is the ultimate goal, the explanation. It's as close to proven as anything in science can be.

Some people think that in science, you have a theory, and once it's proven, it becomes a law. That's not how it works. In science, we collect facts, or observations, we use laws to describe them, and a theory to explain them. You don't promote a theory to a law by proving it. A theory never becomes a law.

This bears repeating. A theory never becomes a law. In fact, if there was a hierarchy of science, theories would be higher than laws. There is nothing higher, or better, than a theory. Laws describe things, theories explain them. An example will help you to understand this. There's a law of gravity, which is the description of gravity. It basically says that if you let go of something it'll fall. It doesn't say why. Then there's the theory of gravity, which is an attempt to explain why. Actually, Newton's Theory of Gravity did a pretty good job, but Einstein's Theory of Relativity does a better job of explaining it. These explanations are called theories, and will always be theories. They can't be changed into laws, because laws are different things. Laws describe, and theories explain.

Just because it's called a theory of gravity, doesn't mean that it's just a guess. It's been tested. All our observations are supported by it, as well as its predictions that we've tested. Also, gravity is real! You can observe it for yourself. Just because it's real doesn't mean that the explanation is a law. The explanation, in scientific terms, is called a theory.

 

[Sapiens Sequax Sex Semita]

A theory never becomes a law. :| A theory explains a law.

People don't realize that ''theories'' and ''laws'' hold different meanings in science in comparison to their everyday definitions.

this ^

Are you trying to say that a theory becomes a law or that a theory is greater than a law (ya know, math notation)?

Either way, there is a Law of Universal Gravitation and also a theory. Evolution is merely a theory. Using gravity is moot.

the law of gravitation just points out the elements that make it up, its very limited in what it tells you and how you can use it to understand gravity where as the theory of gravity takes those observations (laws) and other facets of gravity into account and explains them so they can be understood used and quantified.

 

[Tobi98]

No, it's merely a theory. According to the theory, we have a common ancestor. The fossil of this ''ancestor'' has so far not been discovered. Unless it's discovered, the theory stays as a theory.​

It has muuuuch more proof than creationism tho...

 

[Yusuke Urameshi]

this ^




the law of gravitation just points out the elements that make it up, its very limited in what it tells you and how you can use it to understand gravity where as the theory of gravity takes those observations (laws) and other facets of gravity into account and explains them so they can be understood used and quantified.

I understand. Theories explain "Why?" And nothing new was learned that day...

 

[Sapiens Sequax Sex Semita]

I understand. Theories explain "Why?" And nothing new was learned that day...

the whole point was that theory's carry just as much weight in the scientific world as laws do and quite often are considered more valuable.

 

[Yusuke Urameshi]

the whole point was that theory's carry just as much weight in the scientific world as laws do and quite often are considered more valuable.

I've never heard that been said.