if it wasn't seen or mentioned in a panel, then it didn't happen. Using some theory + logic argument isn't
proof it happened. And that's what i was talking about: proof. Not theory + logic, proof. If you don't have it, don't bother bringing it up. Simple as that.
Oh right, you just told me that I had no rights to say it because you obviously didn't like that I said it. (I find your logic funny.) I also don't want to agree with everyone, that would be boring. But there is a difference in agreeing, disagreeing and just causing un-needed drama.
|
i'm trying to be nice here, but you're making it difficult. I told you in a relatively polite way that you weren't anybody to be telling them what they could or couldn't open their mouth about. Did i say you weren't welcome to say anything? No. Did i say you weren't welcome to having your own opinion? No. I don't see how you could've possibly have gotten that from someone checking you because you were carrying yourself around here like you were someone in charge of this forum telling someone what they could say just because you were getting sensitive over someone else's criticism of the writing or (
which is legit whether you or anyone else likes it or not, btw) or simply because you didn't agree with their opinion.
If the thread title tells you you are going to disagree with someone in said thread about something, you are in no positition to tell them to keep their opinions to themselves because you don't like it/agree with it. You're reaction is entirely on you, and again, i say that in the most polite way possible. If you're going to get sensitive over that, then that's your problem too because i'm not trying to fight about something that everyone here has a right to regardless of their opinion. What that person said in no warranted you telling them to keep their opinions to themselves as they just stated why they are still reading and there was absolutely nothing about that post that warranted that kind of reply from you and you know it.