- Joined
- Apr 27, 2012
- Messages
- 20,009
- Reaction score
- 2,125
You must be registered for see images
So, Egypt has a new leader. Abdul Fattah al-Sisi. It's clear that Field Marshal al-Sisi won by a wide margin, if you've been following the elections. And by wide margin, I mean 96%.
You must be registered for see links
...He inherits a nation that is divided and weary, our correspondent says. Experts warn that if cannot deliver in the next year or two he could face a mass revolt, like his predecessors.
In a televised speech after the poll, Mr Sisi said he wanted "freedom" and "social justice", echoing the slogan of the 2011 revolution.
He said it was now "time to work", adding: "Our co-operation in work and construction will lead to prosperity and luxury."
He also faces a wide array of other challenges, including fixing the economy, easing poverty and preventing further political crises.
Mr Sisi has also promised to restore security in a country where attacks by Islamist militants have left hundreds of security personnel dead over the past 11 months.
The militants have stepped up attacks in response to the state's crackdown on Mr Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, in which more than 1,400 people have been killed and 16,000 detained.
Mr Morsi and other senior leaders of the Brotherhood, which has been designated a terrorist organisation, are currently standing trial on a series of charges. They strongly deny any wrongdoing.
Critics fear that Mr Sisi will continue to show little tolerance for dissent.
This brings up an interesting question:
Would you install a possibly authoritarian figure if it meant restoring the security and economy of your nation, bypassing the democratic bureaucracy, but also meaning you'd have to sacrifice certain political freedoms?