Any work of fiction can be criticized, as any and every work of fiction is as imperfect as the writer. You're looking at it too subjectively. Every person to a degree is different. Different personalities, traits, tastes, styles, intellects, emotional maturity, inspirations, environments, etc, and this effects their interpretations and opinions of things. For example, many believe the Lord of the Rings is a perfect series, whereas I believe in certain parts it is too elaborated, esoteric, poorly paced, one-sided and anticlimactic.
Floydical...let me explain something to you, if wish for people to take your threads, opinions, theses and criticisms seriously, you shouldn't use urban dictionary terms. There's absolutely no literary objectivity to them. The correct terms you are looking for are deus ex machina and diabolus ex machina.
Wrong. People refer to him this way when they dislike a certain direction or cannot see it coming. When their favorite characters are defeated in a way they dislike, when there is a revelation or plot device they do not understand, etc.
Exactly.
I agree. I believe he foreshadows most of his devices and is consistent, though I wouldn't say Bleach is without any plot holes or inconsistencies at all.
It's called minimalism. It's a literary principle used to keep a number of aspects in mystique and suspense in order to use them in later or on multiple occasions.
Agreed.
More or less. Kishimoto tends to constantly expand on lore throughout the series while Kubo either keeps it vague or reals it all at once. Kubo also still makes most of his supporting characters more pivotal to the story, yet keeps is antagonists vague, while Kishimoto in part two steered a bit away from that and focused almost primarily on the development of the two main protagonists and antagonists. I think they both suffer from pacing issues at times.
Retcons are very common in fictional media, especially in comics, TV series, manga and graphic novels that continue as a series for years.
True, but this is often an issue with most mainstream mangakas. With more time, they can pace themselves and their concepts. That's why several of them only release chapters monthly. When they become weekly however, they become subject to a timeframe or deadline and annoying editors and publishers that favor their own ideas and those of the audience and often force the mangaka to do what they want. This has happened numerous times with Kishimoto and Kubo. Kishimoto was forced to cut Hidan's backstory and elaborated fight and techniques out because the editors wanted him to rush things in order to get to the hunt for Itachi arc faster so they could make their big bucks, while Kubo's publishers forced him to make his manga weekly rather than monthly, as was most of the SS arc, and his editors asked him to let several characters he wished to kill off such as Hinamori and Byakuya survive, due to the fan bash lash they feared. They also made him completely cut Ashido from the canon. It was the same thing I believe with Neji and Chouji in the Rescue Sasuke arc.
Your opinion of LotR is that of a personal preference. Does LotR have plotholes? No. What I'm doing is explaining the fact that Kishi has created the potential to confuse his readers by creating situations that can cause them to question his work. This is completely independent of my personal liking of the series.
Deus ex machina and diabolus ex machine? I think I'll stick with troll. I did feel that my explanation in regard to him being was troll was lacking though, so thank you for adding your input.
I was curious about the Hidan revelation. Kishimoto had written somewhere that he didn't have time to expand on Hidan as much as he wanted to, it makes sense it was because of his publishers. I'm quite curious what the Hidan fight and his abilities were like un-edited.
Your talking about a Genjutsu on the level of KA. But if he had such a genjutsu, why would Obito need to control him later? Madara has shown no capability to use something on that caliber. Like I said before, there is enough inconsistency in regard to this issue that is in fact a plot hole until the author expounds upon it.The Bloody Mist is still a vague timeline and plot, but I believe we learned enough to put things together. Madara clearly still possessed a powerful genjutsu with the sharingan he had after he gave his rinnegan to Nagato. And since Nagato was in another country, it was apparent Madara had to have gone there. Before you say he was immobile, you need to remember that the mazou could move on its own on or under ground and carried Obito in and Madara in the war. With these facts in mind, it's safe to say he could still have manipulated Yagura, or the unrevealed third mizukage, who is implied to be the true creator of the bloody mist. In further regards to Yagura, he stated to Naruto that though he appeared as a child, he was actually an adult.
Last edited: