Harry had an unfair advantage

Snape Uchiha

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
4,175
Reaction score
767
Throughout the Harry Potter series, people praised Harry for his Seeking skills and his overall prowess at Quiddich. Now, it is true that Harry had a lot of skill, however, I believe he had an unfair advantage.

In every single one of Harry's matches, except for one in the second book, Harry had the FASTEST BROOM.

Book One
Gryffendor vs Slytherin: Had fastem broom, Nimbus 2000
Gryffendor vs Hufflepuff: Had fastest broom, nimbus 2000
Book 2
Gryffendor vs Slytherin: Had 2nd fastest broom, won NOT because of skill, but because Malfoy wasn't doing anything
Book 3
Gryffendor vs Hufflepuff: Had fastem broom, Nimbus 2000, lost only because of Dementors
Gryffendor vs Ravenclaw: Had fastest broom: Firebolt
Gryffendor vs Slytherin: Had fastest Broom: Firebolt
Book 5
All Matches: Fastest broom, Firebolt
Book 6
All Matches: Fastest Broom, Firebolt

This isn't really a criticism on Harry, more like on the game of Quiddich in general. The players are not on equal footing: Those with faster brooms have an unfair advantage.
 
Last edited:

rama2

Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
56
Reaction score
13
That's called "being the main character". All main characters always have some sort of advantage in the storylines.
 

-PK-

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
736
I always thought about that.
The fastest broom automatically gave a lot of advantage.
 

-PK-

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
4,240
Reaction score
736
why on earth did macgonagall buy him a nimbus 2000 anyway?

Because she was gryffindor's head and wanted them to win the quidditch cup. Harry could have also easily afforded the Nimbus 2000 and i guess she knew he liked it a lot.
 
Top