Because she seems that way in fights. It's all about power. Odds are if many people can beat a character in a fight, they are foddersThe question is not "who she can fight" the question is why fo people bag her by saying she is weak and useless??
Because she seems that way in fights. It's all about power. Odds are if many people can beat a character in a fight, they are foddersThe question is not "who she can fight" the question is why fo people bag her by saying she is weak and useless??
we should give up these people wont get it no matter how much facts,long paragraphs, or whatever is shown.Lol I honestly forgot all about tenten :/
What I am trying say/point out is why do people hate Sakura and bag her by calling her weak and useless, especially since she has achieved great achievements
All those achievements:Because she seems that way in fights. It's all about power. Odds are if many people can beat a character in a fight, they are fodders
Probably right :/we should give up these people wont get it no matter how much facts,long paragraphs, or whatever is shown.
She had numerous of help from ChiyoAll those achievements:
-Winning against Sasori
-Gaining incredible strength (physical) that is only second to tsunade
-Saved and is saving the main character
-Saved and is saving the alliance.... Multiple times
- Everyone in a team has help (This applies to everyone)She had numerous of help from Chiyo
Still not enough to take down a elite ninja
So has Ino, Hinata, Kakashi, Gai and some more. I don't count medical as a feat in fight (Unless you use it like Hashi and Tsunade)
Ino save the alliance multiple times also.
That's not that great of a list as a heroin. (Kishi fought though)
Her medical skills, which she learned from Tsunade are impressive, but Shizune and even Tsuande herself also have great medical feats. Hell, even Kabuto's medical prowess surpasses Sakura when it comes to experience and knowledge. It's not a big deal when characters like Shizune and Kabuto already have medical feats similar if not better than hers who aren't from any special clans either.Lol I honestly forgot all about tenten :/
What I am trying say/point out is why do people hate Sakura and bag her by calling her weak and useless, especially since she has achieved great achievements
I would argue for Lee's development and relevancy being over hers.But the difference with them and her is that shes more of a main character then those two.
- Everyone in a team has help (This applies to everyone)
- what elite ninja? Let me guess someone with a haxxed power and ability? Also one hit from her pucnch is an instant kill.
- By using her medical ninjutsu and slug summon, Sakura has really saved lives by healing characters and using the slug to take the full force of the blow.... This feat alone is on par if not greater then what the names you have listed created or done.
I am not saying Sakura is the all powerful and should be praised by all and loved by all. I am not trying to change people's opinion... I just want a perfectly good explanation and reason to why? Why do people say she is weak and useless, given that she is normal ninja and has achieved great achievements.
My opinion as to why so many people hate Sakura is because of the way Kishimoto wrote the manga. Naruto was split into two parts, with the first part focusing on character establishment within the leaf village, and the second part focusing on the events outside of the leaf village that effect the entire world. In other words, the impressions of characters given in part one play a great role in how we view them. I would venture saying that part two character portrayals are what the author believed to be the most accurate, natural maturation of the characters.
Part one Sakura was portrayed in a way that was different to the typical shonen genre heroine. While it is not unnatural for shonen heroines to be antagonistic to the main character, it is usually balanced by hidden love, comparable combat skill, or reader appeal. Sakura lacked all of these, and actually has love for the protagonist's rival.
To sum up my theory, I think that because Sakura's part one portrayal was so negative (for most readers) and part one is where we base a lot of our preferences from, many people dislike Sakura despite her overt and subtle changes. What do you think?
Again you are misunderstanding what I am trying to say, I am not trying to say she is powerful or that she should be in the top 10 or 20 list.What I am trying to say is that people shouldn't BAG her calling her useless and weak. Sakura who is a normal ninja worked to gain power and skill in medical ninjustu. Yes there are other characters that have done the same thing such as the names that you have provided. However unlike the names that you have provided, Sakura has not been gien a haxxed power and ability.Her medical skills, which she learned from Tsunade are impressive, but Shizune and even Tsuande herself also have great medical feats. Hell, even Kabuto's medical prowess surpasses Sakura when it comes to experience and knowledge. It's not a big deal when characters like Shizune and Kabuto already have medical feats similar if not better than hers who aren't from any special clans either.
Her physical strength still pales In comparison to Tsunade's, so I don't know why that's a big deal. She has no chakra nature affinity and is mediocre if not fodder level compared to the majority of characters from Naruto and they aren't from any special clans like Deidara, Sasori, Konan, Hidan, Kakuzu, Lee, Gai, etc..) Just because she isn't from a special clan does not mean you can use it as an excuse for her being considered great when it's not even the case. Lee started from nothing and look where he is. A taijutsu genius who wasn't born from any special clan and knew nothing about ninjutsu or genjutsu.
You people need to stop using the excuse of a special clan to justify for her short comings to achievements that aren't even great in an overall standpoint of this story, when other non special people (as I mentioned) are way stronger than her.
I stopped reading after the bold in red. No wonder you made this piss poor irrelevant thread. People like you are the reason that people don't like Sakura.Again you are misunderstanding what I am trying to say, I am not trying to say is powerful, she is in the top ten or towenty. What I am trying to say is that people shouldn't BAG her calling her useless and weak. Sakura who is a normal ninja worked to gain power and skill in medical ninjustu. Yes there are other characters that have done the same thing such as the names that you have provided. However unlike the names that you have provided, Sakura has not been gien a haxxed power and ability.
Example:
Gai - inner gates.... (are you seeing what the 8 gates is doing to madara)
Kakuza - Five hearts and other forbidden justus's
Minato - FTG
Sasori - uses puppets (That's included into the special skill)
Etc etc etc.....
Now with her being Normal with no special ability/skill and blood line, she has achieved great achievements such as saving the alliance multiple times, also saving Naruto the main character (Where is Naruto now and what is he up too). Her medical ninjustsu and strength is second only to Tsunade. Shuzine is no where near her level and kabuto not only has senji DNA, but also posesed medical jutsu from the beginning of the anime and has transormed into a dgae beast.
Again she a normal ninja with no speacial skill/ability or blood/clan has achieved great heights. She is also formidable and powerful. I am not saying she is strong and should be in a top list..... The question is why do people say she is weak and uselss when she has achieved these achievements???
Again you are misunderstanding what I am trying to say, I am not trying to say is powerful, she is in the top ten or towenty. What I am trying to say is that people shouldn't BAG her calling her useless and weak. Sakura who is a normal ninja worked to gain power and skill in medical ninjustu. Yes there are other characters that have done the same thing such as the names that you have provided. However unlike the names that you have provided, Sakura has not been gien a haxxed power and ability.
Example:
Gai - inner gates.... (are you seeing what the 8 gates is doing to madara)
Kakuza - Five hearts and other forbidden justus's
Minato - FTG
Sasori - uses puppets (That's included into the special skill)
Etc etc etc.....
Now with her being Normal with no special ability/skill and blood line, she has achieved great achievements such as saving the alliance multiple times, also saving Naruto the main character (Where is Naruto now and what is he up too). Her medical ninjustsu and strength is second only to Tsunade. Shuzine is no where near her level and kabuto not only has senji DNA, but also posesed medical jutsu from the beginning of the anime and has transformed into a sage beast.
Again she a normal ninja with no speacial skill/ability or blood/clan has achieved great heights. She is also formidable and powerful. I am not saying she is strong and should be in a top list..... The question is why do people say she is weak and uselss when she has achieved these achievements???
Character development expands thorugh out the whole manga/anime... It shouldn't just be focused on the first part. Now I know that kisih doesn't really know how to progress the women or portrait them in a good sense. However Sakura still had development and through this development has achieved great heights. But things are inconsistent, especailly with the fans.... Why would they look at other characters and judge them on both series (part one and two) but for Sakura they only look at part one ?My opinion as to why so many people hate Sakura is because of the way Kishimoto wrote the manga. Naruto was split into two parts, with the first part focusing on character establishment within the leaf village, and the second part focusing on the events outside of the leaf village that effect the entire world. In other words, the impressions of characters given in part one play a great role in how we view them. I would venture saying that part two character portrayals are what the author believed to be the most accurate, natural maturation of the characters.
Part one Sakura was portrayed in a way that was different to the typical shonen genre heroine. While it is not unnatural for shonen heroines to be antagonistic to the main character, it is usually balanced by hidden love, comparable combat skill, or reader appeal. Sakura lacked all of these, and actually has love for the protagonist's rival.
To sum up my theory, I think that because Sakura's part one portrayal was so negative (for most readers) and part one is where we base a lot of our preferences from, many people dislike Sakura despite her overt and subtle changes. What do you think?