I won against your fanfic arguments already.but I don't see it
Still no arguments? don't you have any supper for your claim?
eeehh... No you didn'tI won against your fanfic arguments already.
Temari has pretty much become a shikamaru wanker even tho she had good potential in part one, kinda like Hinata who showed promise as a good character in part 1 with her clan issues but was also degraded like temari was. But I do agree with chiyo and Konan. But for some reason, they both died after their only shown fight. Makes me madAnd this is the reason why Lee would be the best heroine:
No i don't.
Are Shino, Kiba, Suigetsu, Asuma better written/developed than the guys i listed?
Having no clan or not is a petty excuese for a characterization.
Let me make an analogy over Lee (as i am knowledgable about by fave and he fits in definition):
The whole potential of his characterization was having nothing special. No kkg, No clan traits, nothing special. That made his room for development. İf you would put him in a clan his character would be cultivated into 1 dimension.
Sakura not having specific linage could be a potential, but it is not used over. She could be a character that everyone can relate, look up, have symphaty for, in early interviews Kishi said that both Lee and Sakura represent human weakness. That's actually a good spot for a "human" character. I said "Lee would be better heroine" at my first post for a reason.
About power of female, Temari, Konan and Chiyo are females with No clan yet they are better developed than Hinata in skill/power and has less lackluster of characterizations.
If your thread was relevant.
I don't think it's a flaw. It's just something different. The flaw is Kishimoto and or his editors choice of development for characters(even Hinata). If the development isn't good or developing fast enough what would make Hinata a better main heroine? I really don't think it would change anything.Kishimoto wanting Sakura to be normal is honestly one of the biggest flaws he's made in Naruto. The point of a main character is that they're not normal; that they're special, hence why they become the main characters.... Hinata is more special than sakura, she isn't normal, that is why I think she would be a better heroine. Sakura is literally plain with no special power and no special clan, no special story, no background, not even any canon parents, or any real issues aside from love and being useful, very lackluster
I uh... You eh... Wtf is that sig ._.I don't think it's a flaw. It's just something different. The flaw is Kishimoto and or his editors choice of development for characters(even Hinata). If the development isn't good or developing fast enough what would make Hinata a better main heroine? I really don't think it would change anything.
Yes, that's my sig. It's dealing with a weird youtube video I saw two years ago.I uh... You eh... Wtf is that sig ._.