[Suggestion] Signature size

[Trollo Lucilfer]

I think there should be a rule for the maximum size of a Vertical signature, since the current signature size rule doesn't allow us to use vertical signatures, I mean we still can use them, but we can't use good looking ones, cuz small vertical sigs are awful imo.

 

[Six Paths]

You should make a request to a Mod or an Admin.

 

[Trollo Lucilfer]

The maximum vertical signature is still 600*300 as we have it as a maximum in general.
Vertical sigs are allowed if you have one within that dimension. Which i wouldn't recommend..

That's exactly what I mean pal, that's why I think the rules should be changed, or there should be a new rule concerning vertical signatures only, a rule that allows us to use vertical sigs with a decent size, something like 500 px in height for example.

 

[Deviation 👑]

That's exactly what I mean pal, that's why I think the rules should be changed, or there should be a new rule concerning vertical signatures only, a rule that allows us to use vertical sigs with a decent size, something like 500 px in height for example.

Wouldn't that take up a lot of space? o__o

 

[Trollo Lucilfer]

Wouldn't that take up a lot of space? o__o

No, not at all.

 

[Avani]

No, not at all.

It stretches the page. So yes it takes too much screen space. If someone makes three one line posts in a thread and you have to scroll down those long vertical signatures before finding something worthwhile to read over and over it becomes highly annoying. Signatures should be just- that a signature. They shouldn't be a hindrance in participation in a discussion with too much scrolling past them, all the time or making it difficult to read actual posts.

 

[Trollo Lucilfer]

It stretches the page. So yes it takes too much screen space. If someone makes three one line posts in a thread and you have to scroll down those long vertical signatures before finding something worthwhile to read over and over it becomes highly annoying. Signatures should be just- that a signature. They shouldn't be a hindrance in participation in a discussion with too much scrolling past them, all the time or making it difficult to read actual posts.

I don't really think it'll takes too much space, people will scroll no matter what, so stretching the page with some pixels is not going to hurt anybody, and it's not really annoying because I'v been on some GFX Forums, and in those forums they let us use three or four signatures, the size doesn't matter as long as it doesn't ruin the whole page by stretching it in two directions, I usually scroll down in order to see the posts and I'v never been annoyed for that, as a matter of fact, nobody has ever complained about it.
Anyway, if you still think that vertical signatures stretch the page, can you guys try to find the correct sig size that can let us use decent vertical signatures without overstretching the page?

 

[Lawliet]

I don't really think it'll takes too much space, people will scroll no matter what, so stretching the page with some pixels is not going to hurt anybody, and it's not really annoying because I'v been on some GFX Forums, and in those forums they let us use three or four signatures, the size doesn't matter as long as it doesn't ruin the whole page by stretching it in two directions, I usually scroll down in order to see the posts and I'v never been annoyed for that, as a matter of fact, nobody has ever complained about it.
Anyway, if you still think that vertical signatures stretch the page, can you guys try to find the correct sig size that can let us use decent vertical signatures without overstretching the page?

The MAX sig height for all normal members is 300 px, premium members get 450 px. Anything other then this will be treated as breaking the rules and will be infracted/warned accordingly. As stated before Vertical sigs do take up a lot of space and they do stretch the page (imagine 10 posts on one page each with a vertical sig- No.) It's also considerate to our members who's internet is not that great.