The road to WW3

LED ZEPPELIN

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
712
Reaction score
57
Why did the United States attack Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen? Why are US operatives helping to destibilize Syria? And why is the United States government so intent on taking down Iran, inspite of the fact Iran hasn't attacked any country since 1798?

And what's next? What are we headed for? When you look at the current trajectory we're on it doesn't any sense if you evaluate things based on what we're taught on school. And it doesn't make any sense if you base your world view by the propaganda of the mainstream media. But it makes perfect sense when you know the motives of the powers that be. And in order to understand those motives, we first must take a look at history.


You must be registered for see images


In 1945 the Bretton Woods agreement established the dollar as the world reserve currency, which means the international commodities were priced in dollars. The agreement, which gave the United States a distinct financial agreement, was made under the condission that those dollars would remain reemdemable for gold at a constant rate of 35 dollars per ounce. The US promised to not print very much money, but this was only in the honor system, because the Federal Reserve refused to give any audits or supervision of its printing presses.

You must be registered for see images

In the years leading up to 1970, expenditures in the Vietnam War made it clear to many countries that the US was printing far more money than it had in gold. And in response, they asked for their gold back. This of course created a rapid decline on the value of the dollar. The situation climaxed in '71, when France attemped to withdraw its gold and Nixon refused. On august 15th he made the following announcement:



Of course this wasn't a temporary suspension, but rather, a permanent default. And to the rest of the world who entrusted the United States to protect their gold, it was outright theft.



In 1973, president Nixon asked King Faiçal of Saudi Arabia to accept only U.S. dollars as payment for oil and to invest any excess profits in US treasury bonds, notes and bills. In return, Nixon offered military protection to Saudi oil fields.
The same offer was extended to every key oil producing countries and by 1975 every member of OPEC had agreed to only accept US dollars as payment for oil.

The act of moving the dollar off of gold and tying it to foreing oil instantly forced every oil importing country in the world to start mainteining a constant supply of US dollar bills. And in order to get that paper they'd have to send real physical goods to America. This was the birth of the petrodollar.

You must be registered for see images

Paper came out, everything America needed came in and the United States got very, very rich with it. It was the largest financial con in recorded history.



The arms race of the cold war was a game of poker. Military spenditures were the chips and the United States had an endless supply of chips. With the petrodollar under its belt it was able to raise the stakes higher and higher, outspending every military budget of the world until eventually US military expenditures surpassed that of all the other countries combined. Soviet Union never had a chance.


You must be registered for see images


The collapse of the communist block in 1991 removed the last counter balance to American military might. For many people that meant a new era of peace and stability. Unfortunately for those in high places, that wasn't the plan.

Within that same year the US invaded Iraq in the first Gulf War, and after crushing the military and infrastructure, and destroying their hospitals, water purification plants, crippling sanctions were imposed that prevented the Iraqi govermnet to rebuild that infrastructure. These sanctions were initiated by Bush senior and were sustained during the entire Clinton administration. Those sanctions made 500000 children die. The US government was fully aware of that.




Ms Albright, what was it exactly worth it for killling 500 000 kids?

In november of 2001, Iraq started to sell its oil entirely in euros, this was a direct on the US financial dominance and wasn't going to be tolerated. As a response, the government with the assistance of mainstream media began to build a mass propaganda campaing saying Iraq had WMDs and was planning to use it. In 2003, the US invaded, and once they had the control of the country, oil sales changed back to euros. It would make any sense at all unless you take the petrodollar into account.



Take a look at the events of the past event and see if you see a pattern.

In Libya, Ghadaffi was in the process of organizing an African common market based on gold, the Dinnar, which was intended to be used as a replacement for the dollar. Western media started to picture him as a cruel, cold blooded dictator, and later, US and NATO destroyed their country in 2011. After that, a new Central Libyan Bank was placed.

Iran has actively campaingning to pull of the sales on dollars for some time now, and recently secured agreements to beging selling it's oil in exchange for gold. In response, the US government is trying to build the idea of striking Iran under the pretext of building a nuclear weapon. In the mean time US officials admited that sanctions upon Iran were aimed at ruining their economy.

Syria is Iran's closest allies and they're bound by mutual defense agreements. The country's is currently under the process of destabilization and NATO have been trying to be able to strike Syria, though Russia and China have warned the White House to not get involved. You should know that intervention directly in Syria and/or Iran won't be considered. It's a full gone conclusion.

Just as it was in Iraq and Libya, the US is trying to create a diplomatic coverage to invade Iran.
The motive for those actions and invasions become clear when you connect the docts I just gave you.

You must be registered for see images


Those in control of the USA understand that even if a few countries start selling the dollar in a currency other than the dollar, there will be a chain reaction that would cause the dollar to collapse. They understand there's nothing holding the value of the dollar right now and so does the rest of the world.

But rather than accepting the US dollar is near its end of life span, they made a calculated gamble.
They will use all of the US military might to crush each and every single financial resistance in Africa and Middle East. That is bad enough. But what you need to understand is that it won't end with Iran.

You must be registered for see images

China and Russia have stated publicly that they wouldn't tolerate an attack on Syria or Iran. Iran is one their key allies, one of the last indenpendent oil producers in the region and they understand that if Iran falls, China and Russia who don't accept the dollar yet will have no chance to escape the petrodollar but to go to war with the United States of America. And yet the US is pushing foward, inspite of the warnings.

What we witness here is a trajectory that leads to straight to the unthinkable. It was a trajectory that was mapped years ago, with full awareness of the human consequences.

You must be registered for see images
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
I'm glad I read this all. It was a good read, though I have to admit I don't understand it all.
 

Itachi Edo

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
4,753
Reaction score
262
Gonna go over people's heads but it's thought out. People only see the storm, not the signs leading up to it.
 

villain55

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
10,730
Reaction score
1,213
I'm glad I read this all. It was a good read, though I have to admit I don't understand it all.

Yeah me too, it was a great read and I agree with the parts I understood.

I am positive he copy and paste this
 

EnDash

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
1,862
Reaction score
175
as a rule of thumb, when everyone screams that war is coming you know that it's not going to happen. wars always happen when people forecast peace and peace only happens when people are preparing for war.

Gonna go over people's heads but it's thought out. People only see the storm, not the signs leading up to it.

which is exactly why all the signs people bring (like this guy) means war is unlikely. the signs are here and known to everyone, everyone is screaming storm before the first drop of rain.
 
Last edited:

asad70ful

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Jul 15, 2011
Messages
2,262
Reaction score
228
I agree to you bro whenever me and my friends talk on topic like this that WW3 is upon us and it's near, it may start in 2017 to 2020, and they just make fun of me,I got close eye on news and everything relates to WW3 bcz I am ready for it, or if I am not then I am preparing myself mentally and physically
 

BazzBee

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 11, 2013
Messages
14,587
Reaction score
1,222
Nice read, nothing to say
 

LED ZEPPELIN

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
712
Reaction score
57
as a rule of thumb, when everyone screams that war is coming you know that it's not going to happen. wars always happen when people forecast peace and peace only happens when people are preparing for war.



which is exactly why all the signs people bring (like this guy) means war is unlikely. the signs are here and known to everyone, everyone is screaming storm before the first drop of rain.

in the world there is peace right now between iran, china, russia and NATO....

signs are very clear as i've just shown.

few people are aware of an upcoming WW3.
 

xLucyx

Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
428
Reaction score
35
Nice thread, glad I read this.

It's actually strange, most of the wars comes in the most unexpected ways :/ For peace, for revenge...One thing must go wrong now and we have a war.
 

EnDash

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
1,862
Reaction score
175
in the world there is peace right now between iran, china, russia and NATO....

signs are very clear as i've just shown.

few people are aware of an upcoming WW3.

we get a thread like this pretty much evey week, and there are bloggers and youtubers and even respected journalists that claim we are all going to war, for this reason and that.

mark my words, when war will happen no one is going to see it coming, it will happen when it is completly unexpected and in places that make no sense for war to start in. WW3 will start in some remote place you rarely hear about and with an event that people like you will call unimportent or a hoax.
 

Fresco

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
1,013
Reaction score
215
You should try and be a little more realistic.

If China and the U.S. are on opposite sides, China loses its largest trading partner. The U.S. is actively funding Syrian rebels and what are China and Russia doing about it exactly? Nothing. Not to mention China and Russia are for disarmament of Syria's chemical weapons(Russia having proposed it I believe?). If a world war starts, it won't start in the Middle East, it would start over the current . Maybe if the Ukrainian revolution turns into a civil war, it could potentially lead to conflicts if Russia were to get involved since there is a current going on in Ukraine, from my understanding.

I'm sure China eagerly wants to be the largest economic and military power in the world, as United States is currently, but it just isn't in a position to be either.

I'm not an expert on foreign policy, but nothing of what you said seemed remotely reasonable.
 
Last edited:

Jazzy Stardust

Banned
Legendary
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
13,494
Reaction score
987
I'm just not in the mood to read all of that man, like you got video links and all. It just seems like a lot of effort on my part.

Though from some of the posts by others, I agree with what EnDash is saying. For decades after WW2 people have been "connecting" the pieces of the appending WW3. When you look back on any past war documentaries they always, ALWAYS say that the attack to start the war came out of nowhere, always. I don't see how you missed that in your research? It's weird.
 

Jonesy161

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Dec 20, 2008
Messages
866
Reaction score
80
I'm not much of a history fan, but hasn't America, for pretty much every war it's been in, prompted the enemy to attack first so America would look like the innocent one?

If that's the case, as long as another country doesn't attack US diplomatic soil, then WW3 should never start. And I mean an actual country, it's government ordered it, not a group of terrorists.
 

EnDash

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
1,862
Reaction score
175
I'm just not in the mood to read all of that man, like you got video links and all. It just seems like a lot of effort on my part.

Though from some of the posts by others, I agree with what EnDash is saying. For decades after WW2 people have been "connecting" the pieces of the appending WW3. When you look back on any past war documentaries they always, ALWAYS say that the attack to start the war came out of nowhere, always. I don't see how you missed that in your research? It's weird.

exactly, before germany decided to invade in WW2 people were sure that the nazi party will never win the elections and that germany was too weak after WW1 to be able to threaten anybody.

since WW2 and the "coming WW3" there have been a couple of wars that barely affected first world countries, but were terrible wars nonetheless. the most brutal of those was probably the bosnian war that developed countries like USA or china like to hide from existence. but people missed predictions of those wars because WW3 was probably more plausable in their opinion.
 

Wabbit

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
11,335
Reaction score
797
Since the end of the cold war US is the only standing global force that can reach anywhere in the world and start the war and also it has NATO and other allies.Neither Russia nor China will not go face to face with US.Unless it related to their local issues like or They are hardly trying to mantain their stratergic importance. Both countries dont want cripple their economy as of now.It is unlikely it will start a WW3.Even if the things get really worse the 3 will not fight directly rather they will start proxy wars,destroying other countries.They are always carefull not get a direct hit.It has happened all through cold war.If really war goes on between those 3 it will be a full scale nuclear war,US is thousands of KM away from both countires,Only thing they can easily make it to reach to America is their ICBMs .they have enough to overwhelm the BMDs.
 

LED ZEPPELIN

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
712
Reaction score
57
You should try and be a little more realistic.

If China and the U.S. are on opposite sides, China loses its largest trading partner. The U.S. is actively funding Syrian rebels and what are China and Russia doing about it exactly? Nothing. Not to mention China and Russia are for disarmament of Syria's chemical weapons(Russia having proposed it I believe?). If a world war starts, it won't start in the Middle East, it would start over the current . Maybe if the Ukrainian revolution turns into a civil war, it could potentially lead to conflicts if Russia were to get involved since there is a current going on in Ukraine, from my understanding.

I'm sure China eagerly wants to be the largest economic and military power in the world, as United States is currently, but it just isn't in a position to be either.

I'm not an expert on foreign policy, but nothing of what you said seemed remotely reasonable.

China is a commercial partner of the United States. Not financial or strategical.
US companies move to China because of cheap labour and China in return gets economical health and US treasury.

But this isn't about a company or a minimum wage. It's about two world powers that have the biggest powers in the world.

It's about financial resistance. If China ever had no choice but to accept the dollar, China would war US. If US had no choice but accept the fall of the dollar, it would war China.


Russia is easying up on the gas at Syria because it seems that Obama agreed to "give" Ukraine to Putin while America is given some influence in hotspots in the Middle East, according to an Ukrainian news-papper and Business Insider.

About Middle East beign the trigger for WW3... A free mason called Albert Pike, which eventually became an American brigade general predicted 3 world wars, 2 centuries ago.

In his book, he said that a first world war would happen in Europe as the result for German and Slav nationalism, and banker's interests. In the outcome, he described the USA as the winner and Germany as loser. He predicted about this war that Austria and Turkey would also collapse.

He also mentioned that a second great war would take place decades later and that it would be triggered again by mostly Germans. Albert Pike predicted that this third reich would try to decimate jewish people. Germany would lose again and the US would be the winner, along with what he refers as the Russian Empire, since he probaly wasn't aware about USSR, and after that there'd be tension between the United States and the Russian Empire. The jews eventually would get their own country in the middle east, Israel, along the West Bank.


About the third war, he said that it would be triggered by this new jewish state against Persia (today Iran) and would drag Russia and China into the war again. Albert Pike said US would win again and from there he said Earth would have less than 500 million people because of the war and a new totalitarian government would be instaured, but instead of governing a country, this totalitarian elite power would govern Earth as whole, he said.
Coincidence?

I have no PhD on foreign policy (yet) but I know more than most my highschool teachers.
 

LED ZEPPELIN

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
712
Reaction score
57
Since the end of the cold war US is the only standing global force that can reach anywhere in the world and start the war and also it has NATO and other allies.Neither Russia nor China will not go face to face with US.Unless it related to their local issues like or They are hardly trying to mantain their stratergic importance. Both countries dont want cripple their economy as of now.It is unlikely it will start a WW3.Even if the things get really worse the 3 will not fight directly rather they will start proxy wars,destroying other countries.They are always carefull not get a direct hit.It has happened all through cold war.If really war goes on between those 3 it will be a full scale nuclear war,US is thousands of KM away from both countires,Only thing they can easily make it to reach to America is their ICBMs .they have enough to overwhelm the BMDs.

The point really is to depopulize Earth. 500 million is the magic number haven't you heard? Also would help the new world order to impose the no go zones pre texted on radiation and fallout.


These control freaks can do anything to save the value of that paper currency. We're just pawns of their chess board and like one spoiled kid that smashes and destroys the board when realizes he is losing the game, the powers that be will do whatever it takes to make the money still be money.
 

accept pain

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
2,600
Reaction score
216
my country has never attacked first on any other country..if someone will try to imply war on my country then we will tell them what the true power is and what is meant by peace....iran is good country and i liked its reputation..

we will welcome ww3
 
Top