Federal Judge decides Texas Law is Unconstitutional

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I was searching around for this article and found that MSN had more information in regards to this. So what do you all think should this law take affect or should it remain unconstitutional? Discuss the reasoning behind your decision and lets have a great debate. Please do not take any of the comments by other member personal this thread is solely for argument purposes only.

 

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I can't go to the link. Can you provide an analysis or summary please?
No problem basically Texas passed a law not to long ago limiting how late you can have an abortion and limiting the types of abortion to where you can only get one if the doctor deems the mothers life is in jeopardy. The federal Judge said that this is unconstitutional because it will close down alot of abortion clinics and many doctors and nurses will lose their jobs as well as violating human rights
 

Sir Blades

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Messages
18,911
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I rather not give opinion cause I am not a female and i would obviously say no to abortion cause we don't have the right to take someone's life away. Its not the child's fault. No amount of scientific research will make me think otherwise. This is the only stance where science will not make me change my mind. But i guess i already gave my opinion.
 

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
If you keep ****ing raw, and keep getting abortions. Thats just nasty. Use a condom.
Its not the same using condoms but hey if you stay with one girl its no problem. But people shouldn't be using abortions as a mean to keep partying or get the choice of killing someone. The way i see is, if you were at least given the chance to live, breath and make your own decisions in life it does not mean that you should take that away from someone else even when its literally your own blood and flesh
 
  • Like
Reactions: ssjsage

FreakensteinAG

Active member
Elite
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,227
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I agree with keeping the time you can receive an abortion early (because if it's "third trimester" late, it will pose problems for the woman's health), but disagree on limiting the types of abortion.

The rest of this argument coincides with my original perspectives on abortion, as always
 

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I rather not give opinion cause I am not a female and i would obviously say no to abortion cause we don't have the right to take someone's life away. Its not the child's fault. No amount of scientific research will make me think otherwise. This is the only stance where science will not make me change my mind. But i guess i already gave my opinion.
Its good man give your opinion so you do support the law that Texas had passed to limit abortions? We are all adults here
 

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I agree with keeping the time you can receive an abortion early (because if it's "third trimester" late, it will pose problems for the woman's health), but disagree on limiting the types of abortion.

The rest of this argument coincides with my original perspectives on abortion, as always
I am intrigued and very interested in your perspective in regards to abortion.
 

DeathandHealing

Banned
Regular
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
615
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Oh here comes the fetus police! The same group of people who pretty much don't give a shit about the child as soon as it's born. They rather watch kids live on the streets and starve than let a mother decide to abort a barley developed fetus.
After the child is born they sit around and insult the Parents for having to get government assistance to take care of the child after the idiots forced them to have a kid. Then they complain and want to remove all the services put in place to help these kids actually live a life outside of crime and poverty.

It will always be a woman's choice, no1 else's. Instead of people fighting against Abortion how about they fight against parenting? You know the Spoiled little white kids who go into schools Shooting everyone because life isn't handed to them like Mommy and Daddy said so?
 

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I am completely against it. I am very reserve when it comes to those matters. I don't mind that they limit the time frame of when to have an abortion.
This law would limit the abortion I believe to a week before the first trimester to have the abortion I believe that is correct I do know for a fact that it was prior to first. Is that to early in your opinion? Also do you support aborting for free will or only if the doctor deems it necessary to do it in regards to the mothers health?
 

FreakensteinAG

Active member
Elite
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,227
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
I am intrigued and very interested in your perspective in regards to abortion.
Very well, let's see if I remember it all!

You can take an abortion even before you realize you are pregnant (if you know you didn't have safe ***, it's presumed to be true) by taking prescription pills that either block sperm cells from fertilizing the egg (then it wouldn't be called abortions in the first place), keep the blastocyte (cells that form after fertilization) from growing, or both.

From here, the blastocyte is no more than just a bunch of cells clumped together. Not even as "lifelike" as tissue. A protozoa is more lifelike than a blastocyte.

So what if it progresses farther? This is where we take both Biology and Psychology into consideration. This is aconsiderably-tougher viewpoint, something that I don't fully commit to myself: It's still applicable to have an abortion. The brain, spinal cord, and heart do not fully develop until well after the second trimester (5-6 months). What does this mean? The embryo is not feeling and not conscious. It wouldn't be mentally-demoralizing to have an abortion at this stage.

So the psychological viewpoint of the previous paragraph. Are you considerably poor? Is your relationship in a fallout? Do you even have a relationship anymore (because potential fathers often run with their metaphorical tail between their legs because they don't want the responsibility)? Will you make your parents look after the child while you take a job/classes? Then you'd want to consider having an abortion anyway if you're still at this stage. Do you really want to bring a sentient being into a destabilizing, harsh life?

Then perform the abortion before the fetus develops nerve endings and consciousness.

Even though I support abortion, I support safe *** drastically more for the mental, emotional reasons the readers would likely understand. More biological aspects of it: having a successful abortion does not mean you're free from the warts dangling off your scrotum/labia because the both of you decided going in natural would be a better experience.
 

AnimusOra

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
2,079
Kin
35๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
2,301๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Oh here comes the fetus police! The same group of people who pretty much don't give a shit about the child as soon as it's born. They rather watch kids live on the streets and starve than let a mother decide to abort a barley developed fetus.
After the child is born they sit around and insult the Parents for having to get government assistance to take care of the child after the idiots forced them to have a kid. Then they complain and want to remove all the services put in place to help these kids actually live a life outside of crime and poverty.

It will always be a woman's choice, no1 else's. Instead of people fighting against Abortion how about they fight against parenting? You know the Spoiled little white kids who go into schools Shooting everyone because life isn't handed to them like Mommy and Daddy said so?
I agree there are many of the people who contradict themselves in the exact statement that you said. However anyone can change everyone has the capability to do whatever they want in life because of the choices that they make. No one is forced into anything everything is a choice. But you see where does the child come into this? The child doesn't get to choose for itself what life it wants? I know many friends of mine who had the life you mention and they turned out great because they chose to be better than their parents. I even had a friend who's mom was raped by his father. She could have decided to end his life there but she didn't and now he is a doctor working in Houston. The point i am making is no one has the right to take the life of choices that some one can make. People take life far too much for grant it.
 

Cursed Prince

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
16,406
Kin
58๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
30๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Abortion? I support that z.z
Basically woman own that baby, it is not born into the world yet. As far as that baby is concerned the mother is "God: And she must act as such. If the best thing would be to rid it of its life, you rid it of its life. If you wanna keep it, keep it. This is one of the things that makes humans stronger than Gods. The power to put ones fate directly in their hands. We dont need nature or our worshipers to do our dirty work

Edit: Holy shit that made no sense :|
 
Top