- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
- Messages
- 1,759
- Reaction score
- 86
Over a week break and then the chapter wasn't even 15 pages. come on now kishi, this is just lazy
Let's not complain when we cannot to a better job....drawing and following a story day in and day out.
Let's not complain when we cannot to a better job....drawing and following a story day in and day out.
Let's not complain when we cannot to a better job....drawing and following a story day in and day out.
oh so when you see a bad movie
or read a bad book
or have a bad teacher
or are hurt by a doctors negligence
you think 'oh I can't complain that this thing is terrible because I couldn't have done this myself'
Stop this BS. Just we can't draw manga, doesn't mean we can't critique one. Even if you can't cook, you know if food tastes good or bad, right? The same concept applies to reading manga.
OT: The manga was normal sized, Kishi just filled it with little content.
Stop this BS. Just we can't draw manga, doesn't mean we can't critique one. Even if you can't cook, you know if food tastes good or bad, right? The same concept applies to reading manga.
OT: The manga was normal sized, Kishi just filled it with little content.
Well....that escalated quickly. If I were to be more specific, let's not directly insult Kishimoto when we couldn't do a better job than him. Obviously you can critique something, but is it fair to call Kishi lazy just because you feel the chapter didn't provide what you wanted from it?!
If you feel the chapter was not so great....sure say something like, "that wasn't the best or most exciting chapter..." But to go and directly criticise and insult the author who works weekly and we don't even pay for his efforts....I feel that is uncalled for. And name calling was the method of insult... a tad immature in my opinion.
And as it was mentioned, it was a full chapter, but was focused more on the specifics of a few moments than that of plot development...because this chapter was simply about escaping the TBB's.
Well....that escalated quickly. If I were to be more specific, let's not directly insult Kishimoto when we couldn't do a better job than him. Obviously you can critique something, but is it fair to call Kishi lazy just because you feel the chapter didn't provide what you wanted from it?!
If you feel the chapter was not so great....sure say something like, "that wasn't the best or most exciting chapter..." But to go and directly criticise and insult the author who works weekly and we don't even pay for his efforts....I feel that is uncalled for. And name calling was the method of insult... a tad immature in my opinion.
And as it was mentioned, it was a full chapter, but was focused more on the specifics of a few moments than that of plot development...because this chapter was simply about escaping the TBB's.
please highlight the name-calling because there's none in this thread.