Is Naruto's large TBB equal to Hashirama's statue?(read first)

[Sennin of Logic]

I thought I'd make a thread of this for the heck of it. That jutsu's so impressive, that one has to wounder if anything equals it. I'll begin. Here's what the statue does.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

Here's what happened when Naruto clashed his large TBB with the edo jinchurikis.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

They're pretty darn close. It looks like more force is put into the statue, but that's because it's hitting the ground directly. The explosion of the TBB I showed you is the fireball itself. If you look below it, you'll see that, despite not being close to the ground, massive derbies were being made. I'm guessing if it did, it would make a valley as well. The only remaining question is whether the explosion would be that large with Naruto's TBB itself. I'd think so. Let's compare the size of a TBB to its explosion.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

It was only the size of the 8 tail's head but became much larger than the 8 tails itself. The 8 tails was tiny compared to the explosion. That's an unbelievable increase in size. Here's how big the large one Naruto produced are.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

I think it's the same level of expansion B's made. I think Naruto's large TBB is equal to. At the worst, the explosion is half that of the clash. However, think of half this power, then slam it to the ground. Hashirama's statue when it comes to destructive power Tell me what you think.

 

[RNITBmsage]

its weaker.

 

[Gerkak]

Nice! I think the explosion is about the same size or slightly smaller.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

its weaker.

It was making dust clouds just by being above the ground. If it touched the ground, it would be similar to the effects of Hashirama's statue.

 

[kunde]

not TBB itself, the explosion

 

[KidGamer65]

Don't forget that the explosion in your second scan was a combo of the power of the 5 Bijuu and Naruto's Bijuu Dama. Not just Naruto's Bijuu Dama by itself.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

not TBB itself, the explosion

Yes, the explosion is what I'm comparing it to.

 

[King Of Crows]

You're comparing the collision of two powerful TBBs to the statue, not Naruto's. It's much weaker in that case.

 

[AGoodBoy]

wtf. It's far smaller and weaker. Plus, all you people do the same thing, you use the Tbb that had the power of 6 other bijuu with it. Infact, kyuubi's tbb didn't have to be as strong seeing as the main purpose was to push their tbb up.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

Don't forget that the explosion in your second scan was a combo of the power of the 5 Bijuu and Naruto's Bijuu Dama. Not just Naruto's Bijuu Dama by itself.

Didn't you read the part where I explained Naruto's can be about the same size?

 

[Cosman]

Explosion is about the same size if you assume the tbb is half Naruto's.

That whole explosion was the combined TBB exploding, but even then I think the destructive capacity of that explosion is stronger than Hashirama's statue.

Scaling that down I think the destructive capacity is either equal or Hashirama's is just a bit stronger.

 

[kunde]

Yes, the explosion is what I'm comparing it to.

O_OO_O k then

 

[Sennin of Logic]

wtf. It's far smaller and weaker. Plus, all you people do the same thing, you use the Tbb that had the power of 6 other bijuu with it. Infact, kyuubi's tbb didn't have to be as strong seeing as the main purpose was to push their tbb up.

You must be registered for see images

The same amount of power to negate it. Naruto's was just as large as theirs by the way.

 

[Microsword57]

Your asking if 6 Bijuu Dama are equal or greater than the power of Hashirama's Statue?

 

[-immortal-]

probably a little bit bigger

 

[End of Days]

wtf. It's far smaller and weaker. Plus, all you people do the same thing, you use the Tbb that had the power of 6 other bijuu with it. Infact, kyuubi's tbb didn't have to be as strong seeing as the main purpose was to push their tbb up.

did you skipped the part where hachibi says about using the same power to negate it?, naruto pushed the tbbs upwards so that they dont get hit directly by the combined explosion
plus look at the size of both tbbs and then say that naruto's smaller and weaker

 

[KidGamer65]

Didn't you read the part where I explained Naruto's can be about the same size?

Naruto's Bijuu Dama have all been the the same size. It clashed with another of the same size and made that explosion. No matter what explanation you provide. 1 Bijuu Dama isn't going to do the same amount of damage as the same Bijuu Dama+another one.

That is like saying 1 can equal 1+1, which is impossible.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

I edited the OP to account for the clash at the end.

 

[Sennin of Logic]

Naruto's Bijuu Dama have all been the the same size. It clashed with another of the same size and made that explosion. No matter what explanation you provide. 1 Bijuu Dama isn't going to do the same amount of damage as the same Bijuu Dama+another one.

That is like saying 1 can equal 1+1, which is impossible.

Point, I edited the OP as a result.

 

[Cosman]

Naruto's Bijuu Dama have all been the the same size. It clashed with another of the same size and made that explosion. No matter what explanation you provide. 1 Bijuu Dama isn't going to do the same amount of damage as the same Bijuu Dama+another one.

That is like saying 1 can equal 1+1, which is impossible.

Yes, but is it fair in assuming that Naruto equals half that destructive capacity? Being enough to deflect it in the air without exploding on it's own first should surely mean that.

Also I'd like to point out the mountain range in correlation to the explosions.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

edit: And this is purely for the sake of destructive capacity. The angle on the bijuu dama has the areal view so it's not conclusive evidence, just something to ponder.