Can you find the ball in this image?
You must be registered for see images
If Women can do anything a Man can do..why not make them do as much as us then? Exactly fck society,
Precisely.
P.s- -1 rep. It burns!
If Women can do anything a Man can do..why not make them do as much as us then? Exactly fck society,
I didn't do anything you **** <:O^ Genius and absolutely hilarious acerbic quip. You were actually making sense with your out-of-the-ass throws. Now I imagine your mouth must be quite envious of your ass. And this is the last response to your juvenile moronic shot at being a third grade comedian. It was fun whilst it lasted. I just pity your sub-par pedigree. Le Sigh.
P.s: Found one yet? Or do you require a torch? With your physical alignment philosophies, I doubt you even had them.
Ciao, my good man. Trudge on. The world is in dire need of your guppy-like intellectual banter. *Awaits another third grade playground level reply* Lol
All of you who are making the argument that *some* women are equally as strong as men are missing the point. They're the exception. Women like that would exceed the minimum requirements for men. My problem stems from females who are accepted into the army when they're physically much weaker than their male counterparts.
Then you should have changed the thread name to "Physically weaker women should not be allowed in combat."
Exceptions aren't usually reflected in a title. If you were going to make a thread about abortion, would you name it:
A. Abortion is wrong!
Or
B. Abortion is wrong, but maybe it's OK when the mothers life would be in danger otherwise!
Sure, B would probably be fine. But A is short, sweet, and to the point. That serves to catch a readers attention. I know the two scenarios aren't completely relatable, but I still think the thread title works well enough as it is. After all, I would expect posters to base their arguments on the actual content of my post.
By lord Amon this thread has derailed.
It derailed the moment you and shelke started having a cat fight
I am flabbergasted the level of non-sense that is grossly rampant in this thread. Hand to hand or handling guns; there is no contest. Women cannot perform at optimum level compared to men given the biological differences. Kindly open a few books to understand how guns works. The constant recoil effect from the gun alone would wear a woman out much faster than man given his superior muscle fibers. It's as if no one has seen a single physics book here. My God!
Women shouldn't be allowed in the army in the combat division as they would take up the positions that could be filled up by men. That's that.
Thank you for living up to what feminist would like to beat with a pipe.
Is that a fact? What does page five read?
Thank you dear. You can run along now.
I didn't carry that on for about 3 pages now did I?
Yes i'll let the men have their discussion while I sit back and mind my female mouth. Funny how you said "Conclusion" Knowing you two you are both bound just to have 3 more pages of nothing but repeated lines of calling each other stupid until a moderator closes this thread. Also, I need a man to defend my honor? What honor? Take all of that frustration and throw at the person that's been talking you down and not the person trying to add humor to a now obsolete thread. Note this has humor in it, in case you didn't know.Of course not. Nor have you contributed anything to this discussion that didn't come out of a beginner's guide to feminism. If you hope to use this discussion to illustrate how men and women are equal you have failed spectacularly. As much as it pains me to say you are a woman who needs a man to defend your honor as you are incapable of doing so on your own.
Take a break for a day. Learn from Hime. Follow her example and study her for she is a model of an excellent woman. In the meantime stand back and let shelke and I bring this discussion to its inevitable conclusion.
Yes i'll let the men have their discussion while I sit back and mind my female mouth. Funny how you said "Conclusion" Knowing you two you are both bound just to have 3 more pages of nothing but repeated lines of calling each other stupid until a moderator closes this thread. Also, I need a man to defend my honor? What honor? Take all of that frustration and throw at the person that's been talking you down and not the person trying to add humor to a now obsolete thread. Note this has humor in it, in case you didn't know.
I was looking for another word as I was busy. Why not argue with shelke like this? If you had been responding to him like this there would have been a more entertaining argument for me to read. My posts try to prove that we have already reached equality? If I ever posted something like that I need a brick to the face because I believe Men and Women are far from equality.1
a : no longer in use or no longer useful <an obsolete word>
b : of a kind or style no longer current : old-fashioned <an obsolete technology>
2
of a plant or animal part : indistinct or imperfect as compared with a corresponding part in related organisms : vestigial
— ob·so·lete·ly adverb
— ob·so·lete·ness noun
As the thread is still in use it's not actually obsolete. The thread is active so it must be in some manner of "style." It's certainly not a plant or animal part so the word obsolete doesn't fit there either. If you hope to assert some manner of superiority or better still, equality, you should first understand the language you attempt to use to tear down your detractors.
I say these things not in mean spirit, but because the more posts you make to prove the equality among men and women, the more you doom your own position and justify Shelke's. In essence you're playing baseball with a tennis racket thus making yourself appear foolish and proving Shelke is right in thinking the way he does.
In a scenario such as this, the best argument you can raise would be one that does not allow you to speak.
By lord Amon this thread has derailed.